User talk:Ravipoovaiah

Designlocal

A tag has been placed on Designlocal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. If you can indicate why Designlocal is really not blatant advertising, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Designlocal. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11 under General criteria. You might also want to read the guidelines on spam. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert why the article is not blatant advertising, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable.

This article is a word-for-word copy of http://www.designlocal.net/about.html. Wikipedia is not a free webhost to mirror your website. Fan-1967 16:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm Vin09. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Kondapalli_Toys, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 12:31, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Rangoli. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. —SpacemanSpiff 07:28, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Kondapalli_Toys, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Vin09 (talk) 17:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 17:15, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]