User talk:Rdellbillings

I have uploaded a draft file to add to Wikipedia and have submitted it to be reviewed. How long is the review process and when can I expect to see the page on Wikipedia? Rdellbillings (talk) 13:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Generic Pharmaceutical Association (May 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Generic Pharmaceutical Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:53, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rdellbillings, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:53, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Generic Pharmaceutical Association (June 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

You need to write about the association, not about the people who lead it. If notable, they can have their own articles. We do not generally include board lists, since those can change often and do not attest to the notability of the organization (all organizations have boards, so that is 'business as usual'). Basically, show what is notable about the organization. (I think it passes notability, but it's hard to tell from this article.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Generic Pharmaceutical Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 16:14, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Generic Pharmaceutical Association (July 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tseung Kwan O was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You should not references from the association's webpage. To establish notability and verify claims, statements in this article must be referenced from independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Generic Pharmaceutical Association and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tseung Kwan O Let's talk 19:03, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Generic Pharmaceutical Association has been accepted[edit]

Generic Pharmaceutical Association, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mduvekot (talk) 16:16, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024[edit]

Hi Rdellbillings! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at United Therapeutics that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. tedder (talk) 15:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Rdellbillings. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page United Therapeutics, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. tedder (talk) 15:51, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your email. I have no personal or business connection with or financial interest in United Therapeutics. I am a part time news researcher with a news monitoring group. I will review again Wikipedia's paid contribution disclosure policy.

Thank you. 74.111.162.229 (talk) 18:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]