User talk:RealCapitalC99

This is RealCapitalC99's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: JL (rapper) (March 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JL (rapper) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:JL (rapper), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 07:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RealCapitalC99! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 07:59, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Strange Music discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Rob van vee 08:46, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JL (rapper) (March 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JL (rapper) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:JL (rapper), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 23:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: JL (rapper) (March 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

David.moreno72 07:49, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Strange Music discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Rob van vee 06:06, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Instagram is not a reliable source. Rob van vee 07:15, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Strange Music discography, you may be blocked from editing. Rob van vee 09:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to User talk:RealCapitalC99. Materialscientist (talk) 09:53, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Materialscientist, it should be noted that it's not the first time this editor has resorted to highly uncivil behavior and despite my repeated requests for reliable sources, this is what I'm met with. Here, once again we see more of the unsourced edits that bring me to their talk page in the first place. RealCapitalC99, at this rate we will be discussing these civility and sourcing issues at WP:ANI pretty soon. Rob van vee 10:27, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

iTunes[edit]

is not reliable. See this guideline and specifically the 3rd bulleted point. Rob van vee 11:05, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Strange Music discography. Rob van vee 06:12, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at 2021 in hip hop music, you may be blocked from editing. ~ Amkgp 💬 05:49, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RealCapitalC99, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

~ Amkgp 💬 05:55, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What the fuck is this shit? I wasn't doing none of this shit, that's a big fucking lie. If you wanna take this shit to FBI and have me arrested for some shit I didn't do, then go ahead. RealCapitalC99 (talk) 06:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:JL (rapper)[edit]

Hello, RealCapitalC99. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:JL (rapper), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Joeee777, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. N Ø 05:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary comment on my talk page[edit]

I just read the comment you left on my discuss page, and I think it was very unnecessary. I would appreciate it if you didn’t do this again.

Also, an Instagram comment section is in no way a reliable source. Please read wp:Reliability to educate yourself on what is consider reliable and unreliable.

Joe. Joeee777 (talk) 11:07, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

==

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ==

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Joeee777 (talk) 11:21, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Waggers TALK 16:00, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes to Strange Music[edit]

Specifically these: [1]. Maybe what you say is true but again, inscrutable Yoda impressions by the artists via social media aren't sufficient to verify any of it. Surely some music mag has stated clearly what's transpired--cite them instead. Ditto for the signing of a new artist--it's a big label, they make big news. Yappy2bhere (talk) 05:55, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and thanks for restoring the "Need more citations" template. Yappy2bhere (talk) 05:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources. Muhandes (talk) 07:16, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:JL (rapper)[edit]

Hello, RealCapitalC99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "JL".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 09:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ahdasee Records for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahdasee Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahdasee Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RoanokeVirginia (talk) 14:01, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at 2022 in hip hop music, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. PICKLEDICAE🥒 09:54, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 12:46, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned and blocked over personal attacks and adding unsourced/poorly sourced before, and looking over your recent edits, in particular this egregious personal attack, it does not seem like you have any understanding of what you are doing wrong. You should've been indefinitely blocked for attacks like these anyways. Please don't act fake tough, especially on Wikipedia of all places... Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 12:46, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]