User talk:Reb1981/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks
Thank you very much, I'm flattered. Rwenonah (talk) 01:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
"Screwtops"
First of all, welcome to Wikipedia and I hope you are made to feel welcome in all your efforts on these pages. I have done some formatting of ships names on the article VAW-123. The hull number is not necessary to the article because there is no confusion as to which ship is being discussed. If the article was discussing two ships with the same name (which happens from time to time) then a hull number would help disambiguate the ships in question. A minor thing.
The question I have about the article is in the last paragraph of the article. "The Screwtops were deployed aboard the USS Enterprise prior to its inactivation in 2013. In July 2014, the Screwtops were transferred to Carrier Air Wing 3, assigned to USS Dwight D. Eisenhower." If the squadron was inactivated in 2013, how are they assigned to Carrier Air Wing 3 in July 2014? It seems that something is missing; perhaps a reactivation date. Fix this and I will assess the article as "B" class. Cuprum17 (talk) 13:33, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Cuprum17 That was meaning when the USS Enterprise was made inactive/decommisoned. That was already on article I will reword it. 22:39, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Reference 1 does not support the last paragraph. One of the problems with using Global Security. Org as a reference is that they parrot whatever subject matter Department of the Defense site publishes without modification and then they don't update it for several years. The reference doesn't cover the history of the unit past about 2000. Can you find another reference to support the sentences in the last paragraph? The Navy site listed as a reference doesn't cover it either or I would have made the change for you. Where did the last paragraph's information come from? You should find that source and use it for your reference. If you can't find a reference, remove the last paragraph until you can find one. with that one paragraph removed, I wouldn't have a problem with assessing at "B" class. I will keep an eye out for your corrections. Cuprum17 (talk) 23:50, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Cuprum17 I see what you are talking about I am not sure where the date came from, but the squadron is now part of the Carrier Wing 3 which is attached to CVN-69. I added the correct references, but removed date until I can find a reliable source for date.
- Reference 1 does not support the last paragraph. One of the problems with using Global Security. Org as a reference is that they parrot whatever subject matter Department of the Defense site publishes without modification and then they don't update it for several years. The reference doesn't cover the history of the unit past about 2000. Can you find another reference to support the sentences in the last paragraph? The Navy site listed as a reference doesn't cover it either or I would have made the change for you. Where did the last paragraph's information come from? You should find that source and use it for your reference. If you can't find a reference, remove the last paragraph until you can find one. with that one paragraph removed, I wouldn't have a problem with assessing at "B" class. I will keep an eye out for your corrections. Cuprum17 (talk) 23:50, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
| This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome to Milhist!
Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.
A few features that you might find helpful:
- Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
- The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
- Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
- The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
- We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
- We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
- If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 01:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Reb. First of all, I would just like to say thanks for being a brother and honest about not only the situation in the BE talk page, but also in other situations. Yes I would normally close down an Rfc after a while or so, But since I have a negative history with two editors, (Snowded and JuanRiley to be precise and whose constant stalking towards me makes me re-evaluate their authenticity in their arguments) whom I don't trust 100%, I would like to keep the Rfc for a bit longer, just in case. I still remember you leaving a message regarding one of them here and kept in in my talk page for being one of my favorite posts in there, and knowing that there are brothers and good editors out there. (N0n3up (talk) 02:42, 28 January 2016 (UTC))
- N0n3up Yes, I remember that situation with JuanRiley. Though you have had your faults you have been doing better since that last time you got suspended at the end of last year. You are doing the right thing now using the talk page and avoiding the revert button. In regards to the RFC I was just suggesting the closure, but I see no reason to keep it going little longer. Reb1981 (talk) 02:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
VisualEditor News #1—2016
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
Now, you can also rearrange columns and rows. Click "Move before" or "Move after" to swap the column or row with its neighbor.
You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.
Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has fixed many bugs. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving support for Japanese, Korean, Arabic, Indic, and Han scripts, and improving the single edit tab interface.
Recent changes
You can switch from the wikitext editor to the visual editor after you start editing. This function is available to nearly all editors at most wikis except the Wiktionaries and Wikisources.
Many local feedback pages for the visual editor have been redirected to mw:VisualEditor/Feedback.
You can now re-arrange columns and rows in tables, as well as copying a row, column or any other selection of cells and pasting it in a new location.
The formula editor has two options: you can choose "Quick edit" to see and change only the LaTeX code, or "Edit" to use the full tool. The full tool offers immediate preview and an extensive list of symbols.
Future changes
The single edit tab project will combine the "Edit" and "Edit source" tabs into a single "Edit" tab. This is similar to the system already used on the mobile website. (T102398) Initially, the "Edit" tab will open whichever editing environment you used last time. Your last editing choice will be stored as an account preference for logged-in editors, and as a cookie for logged-out users. Logged-in editors will have these options in the Editing tab of Special:Preferences:
- Remember my last editor,
- Always give me the visual editor if possible,
- Always give me the source editor, and
- Show me both editor tabs. (This is the state for people using the visual editor now.)
The visual editor uses the same search engine as Special:Search to find links and files. This search will get better at detecting typos and spelling mistakes soon. These improvements to search will appear in the visual editor as well.
The visual editor will be offered to all editors at most "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next few months. The developers would like to know how well the visual editor works in your language. They particularly want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect the following languages: Japanese, Korean, Urdu, Persian, Arabic, Tamil, Marathi, Malayalam, Hindi, Bengali, Assamese, Thai, Aramaic and others.
Let's work together
- Please try out the newest version of the single edit tab on test2.wikipedia.org. You may need to restore the default preferences (at the bottom of test2wiki:Special:Preferences) to see the initial prompt for options. Were you able to find a preference setting that will work for your own editing? Did you see the large preferences dialog box when you started editing an article there?
- Can you read and type in Korean, Arabic, Japanese, Indic, or Han scripts? Language engineer David Chan needs help from people who often type in these languages. Please see the instructions at mw:VisualEditor/IME Testing#What to test if you can help. Report your results on wiki (Korean – Japanese – all languages).
- Learn how to improve the "automagical" citoid referencing system in the visual editor, by creating Zotero translators for popular sources in your language! Join the Tech Talk about "Automated citations in Wikipedia: Citoid and the technology behind it" with Sebastian Karcher on 29 February 2016.
If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thanks!
– Whatamidoing (WMF) 17:47, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Do you want one Edit tab, or two? It's your choice
The editing interface will be changed soon. When that happens, editors who currently see two editing tabs – "Edit" and "Edit source" – will start seeing one edit tab instead. The single edit tab has been popular at other Wikipedias. When this is deployed here, you may be offered the opportunity to choose your preferred appearance and behavior the next time you click the Edit button. You will also be able to change your settings in the Editing section of Special:Preferences.
You can choose one or two edit tabs. If you chose one edit tab, then you can switch between the two editing environments by clicking the buttons in the toolbar (shown in the screenshots). See Help:VisualEditor/User guide#Switching between the visual and wikitext editors for more information and screenshots.
There is more information about this interface change at mw:VisualEditor/Single edit tab. If you have questions, suggestions, or problems to report, then please leave a note at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback.
Whatamidoing (WMF) 19:22, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 2 May 2016
- In the media: Wikipedia Zero piracy in Bangladesh; bureaucracy; chilling effects; too few cooks; translation gaps
- Traffic report: Purple
- Featured content: The best ... from the past two weeks
Radial logo
Do you have access to a logo with a transparent background? They have this logo on their website with a transparent background, http://www.radial.com/press-room/press-kit, but the one you provided is a better fit for the infobox. --Lazervizion (talk) 00:57, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- I don't, but I wonder how big that one is. I will have a look at press kit. Reb1981 (talk) 01:05, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
I can't figure out how to add images. Would you be able to add the logo to eBay Enterprise? I found one on with a transparent background on the Radial site that might work: http://www.radial.com/includes-legacy/images/template/logo-vert.png -Lazervizion (talk) 03:21, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Lazervizion The best thing to use is File upload wizard look on left hand side list under tools or press alt-shift-u then use the wiki commons. I will have a look at the image though. Reb1981 (talk) 19:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 May 2016
- Op-ed: Swiss chapter in turmoil
- In the media: Wikimedia's Dario Taraborelli quoted on Google's Knowledge Graph in The Washington Post
- Featured content: Two weeks for the prize of one
- Traffic report: Oh behave, Beyhive / Underdogs
- Arbitration report: "Wikicology" ends in site ban; evidence and workshop phases concluded for "Gamaliel and others"
- Wikicup: That's it for WikiCup Round 2!
The Signpost: 28 May 2016
- News and notes: Upcoming Wikimedia conferences in the US and India; May Metrics and Activities Meeting
- Special report: Compensation paid to Sue Gardner increased by almost 50 percent after she stepped down as executive director
- Featured content: Eight articles, three lists and five pictures
- Op-ed: Journey of a Wikipedian
- Arbitration report: Gamaliel resigns from the arbitration committee
- Recent research: English as Wikipedia's Lingua Franca; deletion rationales; schizophrenia controversies
- Traffic report: Splitting (musical) airs / Slow Ride
The Signpost: 05 June 2016
- News and notes: WMF cuts budget for 2016-17 as scope tightens
- Featured content: Overwhelmed ... by pictures
- Traffic report: Pop goes the culture, again.
- Arbitration report: ArbCom case "Gamaliel and others" concludes
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Video Games
The Signpost: 15 June 2016
- News and notes: Clarifications on status and compensation of outgoing executive directors Sue Gardner and Lila Tretikov
- Special report: Wikiversity Journal—A new user group
- Featured content: From the crème de la crème
- In the media: Biography disputes; Craig Newmark donation; PR editing
- Traffic report: Another one with sports; Knockout, brief candle
Editing News #2—2016
Editing News #2—2016 Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter
It's quick and easy to insert a references list.
Place the cursor where you want to display the references list (usually at the bottom of the page). Open the "Insert" menu and click the "References list" icon (three books).
If you are using several groups of references, which is relatively rare, you will have the opportunity to specify the group. If you do that, then only the references that belong to the specified group will be displayed in this list of references.
Finally, click "Insert" in the dialog to insert the References list. This list will change as you add more footnotes to the page.
You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.
Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor team has fixed many bugs. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving support for Arabic and Indic scripts, and adapting the visual editor to the needs of the Wikivoyages and Wikisources.
Recent changes
The visual editor is now available to all users at most Wikivoyages. It was also enabled for all contributors at the French Wikinews.
The single edit tab feature combines the "Edit" and "Edit source" tabs into a single "Edit" tab. It has been deployed to several Wikipedias, including Hungarian, Polish, English and Japanese Wikipedias, as well as to all Wikivoyages. At these wikis, you can change your settings for this feature in the "Editing" tab of Special:Preferences. The team is now reviewing the feedback and considering ways to improve the design before rolling it out to more people.
Future changes
The "Save page" button will say "Publish page". This will affect both the visual and wikitext editing systems. More information is available on Meta.
The visual editor will be offered to all editors at the remaining "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next few months. The developers want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect several languages, including: Arabic, Hindi, Thai, Tamil, Marathi, Malayalam, Urdu, Persian, Bengali, Assamese, Aramaic and others.
The team is working with the volunteer developers who power Wikisource to provide the visual editor there, for opt-in testing right now and eventually for all users. (T138966)
The team is working on a modern wikitext editor. It will look like the visual editor, and be able to use the citoid service and other modern tools. This new editing system may become available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices around September 2016. You can read about this project in a general status update on the Wikimedia mailing list.
Let's work together
- Do you teach new editors how to use the visual editor? Did you help set up the Citoid automatic reference feature for your wiki? Have you written or imported TemplateData for your most important citation templates? Would you be willing to help new editors and small communities with the visual editor? Please sign up for the new VisualEditor Community Taskforce.
- Learn how to improve the "automagical" citoid referencing system in the visual editor, by creating Zotero translators for popular sources in your language! Watch the Tech Talk by Sebastian Karcher for more information.
If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you!
Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk), 21:09, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 July 2016
- News and notes: Board unanimously appoints Katherine Maher as new WMF executive director; Wikimedia lawsuits in France and Germany
- Op-ed: Two policies in conflict?
- In the media: Terrorism database cites Wikipedia as a source
- Featured content: Triple fun of featured content
- Traffic report: Goalposts; Oy vexit
Regarding your revertion in the Mother Box article
Hi, you reverted an edit I made in the "Mother Box" article, pointing out that the "mysterious creature" is not confirmed to be Steppenwolf. If you go to the Steppenwolf page though, from which I sourced my edit, it is claimed that "it is confirmed that he is Steppenwolf". Sahstar (talk) 10:57, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
- Sahstar Another Wiki is not reliable reference unless properly cited. There has not been any official confirmation from the production company that this figure is Stepphenwolf. Reb1981 (talk) 19:57, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Flags in Infoboxes
Please see this:[1] from the Manual of Style on the use of flags in Infoboxes. regards Mztourist (talk) 06:58, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- It is not a rule but suggested. The flag has been included with just about each squadron. It has been there for years. Reb1981 (talk) 09:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
- I disagree, the language is clear that flags in Infoboxes should be used sparingly, if at all, but you're welcome to seek clarification on this on the project page. Mztourist (talk) 03:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
- Mztourist unless you going to change all of them. There is no reason to just leave it alone.Reb1981 (talk) 19:34, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 21 July 2016
- Discussion report: Busy month for discussions
- Featured content: A wide variety from the best
- Traffic report: Sports and esports
- Arbitration report: Script writers appointed for clerks
- Recent research: Using deep learning to predict article quality
The Signpost: 04 August 2016
- News and notes: Foundation presents results of harassment research, plans for automated identification; Wikiconference submissions open
- Obituary: Kevin Gorman, who took on Wikipedia's gender gap and undisclosed paid advocacy, dies at 24
- Traffic report: Summer of Pokémon, Trump, and Hillary
- Featured content: Women and Hawaii
- Recent research: Easier navigation via better wikilinks
- Technology report: User script report (January to July 2016, part 1)
The Signpost: 18 August 2016
- News and notes: Focus on India—WikiConference produces new apps; state government adopts free licenses
- Special report: Engaging diverse communities to profile women of Antarctica
- In the media: The ugly, the bad, the playful, and the promising
- Featured content: Simply the best ... from the last two weeks
- Traffic report: Olympic views
- Technology report: User script report (January–July 2016, part 2)
- Arbitration report: The Michael Hardy case
The Signpost: 06 September 2016
- Special report: Olympics readership depended on language
- WikiProject report: Watching Wikipedia
- Featured content: Entertainment, sport, and something else in-between
- Traffic report: From Phelps to Bolt to Reddit
- Technology report: Wikimedia mobile sites now don't load images if the user doesn't see them
- Recent research: Ethics of machine-created articles and fighting vandalism
Military history WikiProject coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 September 2016
- News and notes: Wikipedia Education Program case study published; and a longtime Wikimedian has made his final edit
- In the media: Wikipedia in the news
- Featured content: Three weeks in the land of featured content
- Arbitration report: Arbcom looking for new checkusers and oversight appointees while another case opens
- Traffic report: From Gene Wilder to JonBenét
- Technology report: Category sorting and template parameters
Editing News #3—2016
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter • Subscribe or unsubscribe on the English Wikipedia
Did you know that you can easily re-arrange columns and rows in the visual editor?
Select a cell in the column or row that you want to move. Click the arrow at the start of that row or column to open the dropdown menu (shown). Choose either "Move before" or "Move after" to move the column, or "Move above" or "Move below" to move the row.
You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.
Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has mainly worked on a new wikitext editor. They have also released some small features and the new map editing tool. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the list of work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, releasing the 2017 wikitext editor as a beta feature, and improving language support.
Recent changes
- You can now set text as small or big.[2]
- Invisible templates have been shown as a puzzle icon. Now, the name of the invisible template is displayed next to the puzzle icon.[3] A similar feature will display the first part of hidden HTML comments.[4]
- Categories are displayed at the bottom of each page. If you click on the categories, the dialog for editing categories will open.[5]
- At many wikis, you can now add maps to pages. Go to the Insert menu and choose the "Maps" item. The Discovery department are adding more features to this area, like geoshapes. You can read more on MediaWiki.org.[6]
- The "Save" button now says "Save page" when you create a page, and "Save changes" when you change an existing page.[7] In the future, the "Save page" button will say "Publish page". This will affect both the visual and wikitext editing systems. More information is available on Meta.
- Image galleries now use a visual mode for editing. You can see thumbnails of the images, add new files, remove unwanted images, rearrange the images by dragging and dropping, and add captions for each image. Use the "Options" tab to set the gallery's display mode, image sizes, and add a title for the gallery.[8]
Future changes
The visual editor will be offered to all editors at the remaining 10 "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next month. The developers want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect several languages, including Thai, Burmese and Aramaic.
The team is working on a modern wikitext editor. The 2017 wikitext editor will look like the visual editor and be able to use the citoid service and other modern tools. This new editing system may become available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices in October 2016. You can read about this project in a general status update on the Wikimedia mailing list.
Let's work together
Do you teach new editors how to use the visual editor? Did you help set up the Citoid automatic reference feature for your wiki? Have you written or imported TemplateData for your most important citation templates? Would you be willing to help new editors and small communities with the visual editor? Please sign up for the new VisualEditor Community Taskforce.
If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:19, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 October 2016
- News and notes: Fundraising, flora and fauna
- Discussion report: Cultivating leadership: Wikimedia Foundation seeks input
- Technology report: Upcoming tech projects for 2017
- Featured content: Variety is the spice of life
- Traffic report: Debates and escapes
- Recent research: A 2011 study resurfaces in a media report
The Signpost: 4 November 2016
- In the media: Washington Post continues in-depth Wikipedia coverage
- Wikicup: WikiCup winners
- Discussion report: What's on your tech wishlist for the coming year?
- Technology report: New guideline for technical collaboration; citation templates now flag open access content
- Featured content: Cream of the crop
- Traffic report: Un-presidential politics
- Arbitration report: Recapping October's activities
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
|
You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Reb1981. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 November 2016
- News and notes: Arbitration Committee elections commence
- Featured content: Featured mix
- Special report: Taking stock of the Good Article backlog
- Traffic report: President-elect Trump
The Signpost: 22 December 2016
- Year in review: Looking back on 2016
- News and notes: Strategic planning update; English ArbCom election results
- Special report: German ArbCom implodes
- Featured content: The Christmas edition
- Technology report: Labs improvements impact 2016 Tool Labs survey results
- Traffic report: Post-election traffic blues
- Recent research: One study and several abstracts
Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!
  
|
Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.
The Signpost: 17 January 2017
- From the editor: Next steps for the Signpost
- News and notes: Surge in RFA promotions—a sign of lasting change?
- In the media: Year-end roundups, Wikipedia's 16th birthday, and more
- Featured content: One year ends, and another begins
- Arbitration report: Concluding 2016 and covering 2017's first two cases
- Traffic report: Out with the old, in with the new
- Technology report: Tech present, past, and future
Hello Reb1981, I too am a naval history buff. I'm a retired USN Captain 30 year naval aviator and love the Navy's aviation heritage. On your point of some squadron websites using the term "commissioned" rather than "established" to refer to the stand up of their squadron; I would say just because the junior officer who authored the website used the term "commissioned" does not make it correct.
The authority on the subject is the Naval Heritage and History command. I'm sure you've seen their website but if you haven't it is at "https://www.history.navy.mil/research/histories.html". On the site you'll find OPNAVINST 5040.4G at "https://www.history.navy.mil/research/histories/naval-aviation-history/insignias/navy-aviation-insignia-instruction.html". Check out "Enclosure (2): Current Navy Aviation Squadron Lineage List" and you'll see the correct terminology, including the clear statement " When dealing with a squadron's lineage, the only correct terms to use are “establishment,” “disestablishment” and “redesignation.” The terms “commissioning” and “establishment” have been used interchangeably for years and that is incorrect. Only ships are commissioned, decommissioned and receive commissioning pennants. Squadrons have establishment and disestablishment ceremonies."
After that check out "Enclosure (1): Rules for Navy Aviation Squadron Lineage Program and Approval Procedures" and you'll see that there was a change in 1999 with regard to the use of the word "disestablishment" when dealing with the existence of U.S. Navy aircraft squadrons. The entire instruction is very informative and interesting.71.219.243.238 (talk) 03:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- 71.219.243.238 Thank you for that information. That was my main thing I am big on showing reliable sources on information. My father did 20 years in Navy as well he was an AE and aircrew with different squadrons like VQ-1 and VAW-125. Thank you for your service! Reb1981 (talk) 04:59, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 February 2017
- Arbitration report: WMF Legal and ArbCom weigh in on tension between disclosure requirements and user privacy
- WikiProject report: For the birds!
- Technology report: Better PDFs, backup plans, and birthday wishes
- Traffic report: Cool It Now
- Featured content: Three weeks dominated by articles
Your edit has been reverted again on the fore-mentioned page. This is not a useful contribution to the article. While the term "transatlantic" alone is not a proper name, the term "Transatlantic accent" is a proper name, and therefore it would be capitalized. If such edits continue, you could be potentially banned from editing.LakeKayak (talk) 21:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- LakeKayak Take it to talk on article. My edits are in line with proper grammer. Reb1981 (talk) 21:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
No. They aren't. The name of the accent is "Transatlantic accent" and therefore the "t" would be capitalized.LakeKayak (talk) 21:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- LakeKayak, please take to talk on article. I already put in a discussion. Another example transatlantic flight. Reb1981 (talk) 21:48, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- RE:I have already showed proof. Please do not revert with something currently on talk page.. If you continue it could be considered an edit-war.
- No, you haven't. You never showed any source that explicitly/implicity stated whether or not an accent name was capitalized. How about we take this the page Capitalization in English? An editor there probably would be have reviewing this for some time and may be able to point us in the right direction.LakeKayak (talk) 21:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Grammar check check
I'm sorry to be a downer but checking one of your recent edits I find a mishmash of good and bad changes. Your change to Austin, Texas has some strangenesses...
- As of the U.S. Census Bureau's July 1, 2015, estimate, Austin has a population ...
- This scans quite weirdly; are you sure you value the added comma so highly?
- ... settled the issue to keep Austin the seat of government as well as the annex the Republic of Texas into the United States.
- Your addition of the 'the' is just wrong.
- ... that sit over the Blackland prairie, ...
- 'blackland' here is not a place name
- The area is very diverse ecologically and biologically and is home to a variety ...
- Here I think the comma was needed, so as to show the list "A and B" was not being continued.
- ... are slight to moderately alkaline ...
- Just wrong to change from 'slightly'
- Barton Creek Greenbelt, Bull Creek Park, and McKinney Falls State Park.
- You do know that the Oxford comma is a stylistic variation and not a grammar problem, right? Not really something that needs changing the multiple times you do. And then changed back by someone else. And then changed again by another. And then ... so on and so on.
- For every 100 females, there were 105.8 males.
- I just don't, get, why people, value, commas so highly.
- ... of those under age 18 and 8.7% of those ages 65 or over.
- It 'read' weird to you, now it reads weird to me. "age 65" is a thing. What is "ages 65"?
- Austin had the third-highest rate in the nation.
- This is one of the couple of changes I agree with. But other people disagree with us both. So barring a definitive reasoning, why fiddle with the text?
- ... built in 1886, once owned by George W. Littlefield, and located at 6th and Brazos streets was finished ...
- I don't know the terminology, but you dropped the comma off a qualifying clause and now it reads like it is all jammed together.
- Paragraph beginning "Natural features like the bicycle-friendly ..."
- You destroyed the paragraph, and didn't notice?
- ... Austin-Bergstrom International Airport ...
- Why didn't you just fix the link to be Austin–Bergstrom International Airport ?
- The University of Texas Police operates from the University of Texas.
- Believe it or not this is another purely stylistic variant. Here you at least are congruent with common American conventions, which often consider an organization as singular. 'operate' is however also valid and allowed, considering the organization as composed from its members.
- Austin is also home to child developmental institutions including the ... and much more.
- 'many' was correct.
- ... to the traffic congestion on Interstate 35.
- "traffic congestion" as a state/condition, or a lot of cars/trucks? 'of' was fine.
- This is a multi-jurisdictional project called ...
- Love it! And all too often seen here. "multi jurisdictional"? Say what? People here can't seem to agree if the parts are individual separable pieces, or should be jammed together ('multijurisdictional'), or could just be made clearer by using the old familiar hyphen. (There seems to be great disdain for hyphens here abouts)
- As of the U.S. Census Bureau's July 1, 2015, estimate, Austin has a population ...
Anyway, given that much of this edit seem to be stylistic opinionativeness, and you didn't even notice destroying a paragraph, I have to wonder where the changes are coming from? Existing text here is not to be considered some leaf-filled yard to be raked over until looking 'better' according to the latest passer-by.
There are worthy causes enough and areas at Wikipedia that need fixes, without having to "draw legs on a snake". Shenme (talk) 04:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Shenme, I been working on different projects, some of that was a crazy oversight. I have to admit that, but thanks for the effort on the feedback. Reb1981 (talk) 04:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
March Madness 2017
G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:
- tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
- updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
- creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.
For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2017
- From the editors: Results from our poll on subscription and delivery, and a new RSS feed
- Recent research: Special issue: Wikipedia in education
- Technology report: Responsive content on desktop; Offline content in Android app
- In the media: The Daily Mail does not run Wikipedia
- Gallery: A Met montage
- Special report: Peer review – a history and call for reviewers
- Op-ed: Wikipedia has cancer
- Featured content: The dominance of articles continues
- Traffic report: Love, football, and politics