User talk:Rebent

gtfimp

Jeanette Schmid

Please edit the article if you think it is an essay/fan site etc, rather than simply sticking various notices on it. --Roisterer 12:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Without wanting to make a saga out of this as I'm sure we both have better things to do with our time, I thought I'd raise some issues. First, in answer to my above question, you replied "Sadly, that's not how Wikipedia works." But editors working together to edit an article is exactly what Wikipedia is all about. Have I misunderstood your statement? I hope so.

Second, in your response, you add "I do know when something is making outrageous and unverified claims." What claims are outrageous or unverified? As you can see, I have provided two sources, which verify the claims.

Third, you argued that the article is a a) copy vio (presumably of the Sydney Morning Herald article listed in the references, b) a resume and c) fan site. If it's a copy vio, then I can't see how it can be either or both of the others as one doubts that the SMH would be posting a resume or fancruff in its obituary section. I indeed never heard of Ms Schmid until I read her obituary and have no great interest in her beyond thining that she would be notable enough for an article.

Fourth, you state "Wikipedia is not a place for you to tell the world your personal opinions. One newspaper artical is not a reliable source, and you need MORE than the original author to insure verifiablility)"

They are not my personal opinions; please list some of the points you believe to be personal opinions and we can work on them. I have listed two sources and I am not sure what you mean by "you need more than the original author to insure verifiability". Who do you mean by "the original author" in this case? --Roisterer 13:06, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Death Star

So your right and George Lucas and Darth vader are wrong?

Talk:Todd Goldman

Please keep it civil. Personal attacks and insults are prohibited by policy and may lead to blocking if they continue. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 22:10, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 20:23, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs History of spamming Velothi Mountains Lyn Brown (politician) Archaeology of the Americas Organization for Interactive Computing Model Misbehavior The Ultimate Monty Python Rip Off 8 Simple Rules for Buying My Teenage Daughter Chantinelle Poképark Gu Li The Guild of Thieves Hamfast Gamgee Jen Taylor Alejandro Honda Demons (Enterprise episode) The World (radio program) Keyword density PAL region

Cleanup Card Hero Internet humor Hakha Merge Distributed web crawling Valenwood Video CD Add Sources Cars (film) SEO contest JANET Wikify Scientific management Super Buster Brothers George Manuel Expand Kaimingye germ weapon attack Mesh networking Kirby's Dream Land 3

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 16:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Tribunal

Good news, Rebent! I've excised the plot info from the Tribunal section of The Elder Scrolls III: Morrowind' article, as you so kindly requested. I think I'm only a few brief CEs away from FAC. Wish me luck! Geuiwogbil 22:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

It's okay, I understand. Thanks for your comments on the Tribunal plot section! They're better than anything I've yet had in regular old PR. ^_^ Geuiwogbil 22:39, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Spam (Monty Python)

The point of talk pages is to discuss improvement of the article they're attached to. Offtopic remarks can be removed. See Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#How_to_use_article_talk_pages. Kusma (talk) 14:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Spam (Monty Python) for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. -- lucasbfr ^talk 08:22, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

In addition, please remember that wikilawyering is discouraged, and that distrupting wikipedia (to make a point or otherwise) is prohibited. If you persist you might run into admins that use another part of the policy to give you a new perspective, for a while. Best wishes CharonX/talk 15:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

• the day we lose our sense of humor is the day we have nothing left to live for --Rebent

Morrowind FA

Actually, i think it is. Look here, first entry on the FA Log page: Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Featured_log/May_2007#The_Elder_Scrolls_III:_Morrowind. Raul moved it to the FA logs just this afternoon. It's in WP:FA#Computers_and_video_games, too. It's just that GimmeBot hasn't come around with the tags yet. It seems like the completion of the FA process consists of a series of steps, as different databases are updated by different bots and users. Or at least, that's what I'm thinking. The Wikiproject Video Games has it on their list, too. It's weird how the FA tag bot hasn't come around yet, but it seems uncouth to do any front-end edits personally before those talk page tags are automatically added. Thanks for your concern, by the way! Geuiwogbil 23:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

replied

on the page, i replied....Charred Feathers 03:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

(please dont take the words too emotionally, its not supposed to be like that... i just get a lil... uhhh... wound up sometimes if i did i is sorry)Charred Feathers 03:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Nice try, but wrong!

[1] This edit summary is NPOV and a blatant attack. It is untrue that Sam is the best most assome person in the whole worl! SchmuckyTheCat

Lackadaisy picture

Hello. I just replaced the lackadaisy picture's license you uploaded to a fair use license because I didn't found a written proof of the license through gfdl. I emailed Tracy about that and expect to have a "GFDL" or CC-By-Sa license answer to paste at Wikipedia:Successful requests for permission and send for archive at the wikipedia fondation. -- 70.50.181.2 05:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks! I talked to her on IM via the address she has listed on lackadaisycats.com and she told me I could use pretty much any images from her site. But I've never done wikipedia copyrights before so I am not sure how it's supposed to be done. --Rebent 06:09, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Errr I just discovered I forgot to log in when commenting. Well I'm waiting her answer :).

Ok it's done under gfdl now and the permission is archived. Cheers :). -- Esurnir 03:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Bans

Seems like it was taken care of. Sorry I couldn't be of any help. :( Geuiwogbil 20:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Reliable Sources for Biographies of Living People

In case you're not watching Talk:Todd Goldman, I invite you to discuss the issue of reliable sources over at User:Superluser/Reliable Sources for Biographies of Living People. Thanks! superluser_tc 2007 July 10, 05:24 (UTC)

MFD

Note, several of your userpages have been nominated for deletion here: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rebent/psychology, please see that link for more information and a place to voice your objections to deletion. — xaosflux ^Talk 04:34, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Sorry?

I'm sorry that I reverted one of your own edits, but you must admit, when you edit from your IP address, I really have no way of knowing that it is you who is editing this page. That is why I thought that it was vandalism. Please, next time, ensure that you are logged in before committing edits like this. Thank you. Diez2 04:48, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

Link removal.

1 link removed - Site concerned got busted :( Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:57, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Cloud game

I answered your request at Cloud Game Talk Kuro ♪ 06:17, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)