User talk:Rebjorn79

Welcome!

Hello, Rebjorn79, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Diablo II, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. DP76764 (Talk) 20:11, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bjørn Håland

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bjørn Håland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Tentinator 11:09, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Graham Hancock, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Harryhenry1 (talk) 02:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 09:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rebjorn79 You haven't edited for a long time and then emerged to ass "-Kind regards, the Arrogant, Ignorant Coward Team." to the hidden comment saying "-This is NPOV. Do not change it to softer words (e.g., unconventional) or it will be reverted.". This is clearly unacceptable. If you have a good argument why your ability to edit articles should be restored, perhaps I or some other editor will restore your access to them. As I can't partial block you from all pseudo articles I've had to block you from article space. Doug Weller talk 09:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]