User talk:ReelCrowdPleaser

Welcome!

Hello, ReelCrowdPleaser, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kleuske (talk) 14:09, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chef (South Park) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chef (South Park) was changed by ReelCrowdPleaser (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.917334 on 2017-03-06T16:15:06+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:15, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Plankton (character). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 7Sidz (talk) 16:35, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chocolate Salty Balls, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Chocolate Salty Balls was changed by ReelCrowdPleaser (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953674 on 2017-03-06T16:39:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:39, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Simpsons Movie.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: The Simpsons Movie was changed by ReelCrowdPleaser (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960157 on 2017-03-06T16:45:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:45, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 16:52, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Medicinal Fried Chicken has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Medicinal Fried Chicken was changed by ReelCrowdPleaser (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892375 on 2017-03-09T13:41:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:41, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cartman Sucks. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cartman Sucks was changed by ReelCrowdPleaser (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90997 on 2017-03-09T13:48:15+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lay's, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Lay's was changed by ReelCrowdPleaser (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929501 on 2017-03-09T13:56:16+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:56, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do not revert the AIV report

Let the administrators handle it. TheCoffeeAddict talk|contribs 14:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You asked for a chance. Is there a reason why you insist on vandalizing articles? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's funny and SOME PEOPLE don't have a sense of humor. If numerous users have done it frequently, then why can't I? Besides, with Donald Trump (someone who is widely despised) as our president, anything is possible and anything can be used as an excuse, right? ReelCrowdPleaser (talk) 14:16, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All right, I've now blocked you indefinitely. I can't ask other editors to waste their time cleaning up after you because you think defacing articles is funny. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:27, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:53, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]