User talk:Refprotevang

Hello, Refprotevang, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 21:43, 26 May 2012 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Refprotevang, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! heather walls (talk) 08:00, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod and related edits

I've noticed several edits like this one, in which you change a specific term to the more general 'protestant.' I'm a little unclear on the reason for these edits, but in general, at Wikipedia, if a more specific term is going to be more informative for the reader, then that's the term that is best to use. You might find it useful to review the neutral point of view policy, and ask yourself whether your recent edits are motivated by a personal, religious, or political point of view. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:26, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Glasgow

Regarding this edit, Wikipedia generally uses the modern, not the archaic, spelling, in order to be easier for readers to understand. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:35, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Anglican Communion

Regarding this edit, it seems to be similar to a number of edits of yours which I have spend the last ten minutes or so correcting. You appear to be systematically changing words on Wikipedia from the terms they are called by members of an organization, to the terms you think those members ought to use. This is a violation of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. I urge you to carefully read that policy, and consider how it applies to your recent edits. You may not rewrite Wikipedia to better reflect your own religious or political views. Please read the policy and carefully consider it before making any more edits. Thank you. -12:39, 27 May 2012 (UTC)