User talk:Reinarvega

Nomination of Baraha (Indie Film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baraha (Indie Film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baraha (Indie Film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 15:51, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reinarvega, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Reinarvega! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hello, Reinarvega. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:08, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you are the director of Baraha. I would like to request that you stop trying to add it to the mainspace on Wikipedia for the time being. Not only is there a concern over a conflict of interest, but the problem is that I don't see where your film passes notability guidelines per WP:NFILM. I don't see where your film received any coverage in reliable sources. I also have some concerns that this might be a bit of self promotion, but what concerns me the most is that in one section you wrote about how the film was declined at a film festival. The section seemed a little angry, like you're upset with the film festival for not taking your movie and as such came across as disparaging towards the film festival. This is part of the reason why it's discouraged for people to edit pages you have a conflict of interest with, as it's very easy for personal emotions to come through in the writing. I know that this might seem upsetting, but right now your movie just doesn't pass notability guidelines. This is very, very normal for student films, as most never gain coverage in reliable sources. But we can't have an article until the movie has gained that coverage. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Baraha (Indie Film)

A tag has been placed on Baraha (Indie Film), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of pages

I've salted the page to prevent re-creation. Please stop trying to add the film to Wikipedia. It doesn't pass notability guidelines and looks like it will be unlikely to have any notability in the future. We can only have articles for films if the film passes our notability guidelines. Any other reason does not suffice. If you continue to re-add the film then you will run the risk of getting temporarily or permanently blocked for disruption. Repeatedly adding something you are personally involved in can also be seen as spam. Please do not re-add this film to Wikipedia for the time being. It's just far too soon for this to have an entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:52, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 12:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]