User talk:Remdabest

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lúdvik Jósepsson, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Icelandic and Nes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rebellion Beer Company

Hello, Remdabest. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Rebellion Beer Company, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 06:01, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rebellion Beer Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marlow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Remdabest. You have new messages at Blanchardb's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK nomination of Rebellion Beer Company

Hello! Your submission of Rebellion Beer Company at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pgallert (talk) 20:41, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Surplus women

Hi, I just noticed you copied this out of my sandbox in October :) That's not a problem (though I suggest in future a courtesy note is a good idea). However, just to let you know - please don't copy pages via cut and paste as this breaks the attribution requirements of the license used for the content (i.e. it is a copyright violation). To move a page there is an option in the menus at the top right of pages which let you move the entire page history at once! Cheers, --Errant ^(chat!) 12:31, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I am sorry I did not include a courtesy note. How does one this? I am still new to creating articles etc so thank you for the advice - will bare this in mind. Your article was very useful. --Remdabest (talk) 01:53, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Rebellion Beer Company

On 4 January 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rebellion Beer Company, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Rebellion Beer Company, a microbrewery in Marlow Bottom, South East England, uses the chalky water of the local Chiltern Hills, which has high levels of minerals and salts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rebellion Beer Company. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Ernest Roume

A couple of points about the creation of the article Ernest Roume.

The original French article has a none standard appendix section with the main header called "Articles connexes" (Related items) and sub sections "Voir aussi", "Bibliographie", "Liens externes" (See also, References, External links) "Bibliographie" of course can also be "Bibliography", but whether you translate it as "References" or "Bibliography" either would make a better translation than "Further reading" as "Further reading" implies that the entries in that section are not references and therefore that you wrote an stub article with no referenced sources.

The second point is a technical one. I presume that what you meant to display was the ISBN number. To do that just put the ISBN followed by the number and the software that formats the page auto-magically changes it into the link:

Paul E. Lovejoy et A.S. Kanya-Forstner (dir.), Slavery and its abolition in French West Africa : the official reports of G. Poulet, E. Roume, and G. Deherme, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1994, p. 206 ISBN 0942615220

You should not use {{ISBN}} which does not do what you though it does, instead it produced the following output:

Regards PBS (talk) 13:51, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Le Romain

Hi Remdabest. I noticed you reverted my edits to the page Romain, and put back the section headed "Le Romain". The reason I removed that section was because of the new page you created at Le Romain. To me it doesn't seem sensible to have the same list in two places at once, so I wanted to make Romain just link to Le Romain and avoid the duplication. What do you think? —Noiratsi (talk) 13:29, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. In my experience when English speakers use epithets such as 'Le Romain', there can sometimes be a tendency to miss out the 'Le' (I imagine due to how English surnames work?) I therefore think that a search for 'Romain' should come up with a reference to the epithet 'Le Romain' for this reason. Do you agree? I would be happy if there was either a link to the Le Romain page on the Romain page, or if it were left as it currently is with Le Romain incorporated on the Romain page. What are your thoughts? Thank you for contacting me. --Remdabest (talk) 14:18, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it seems like a good idea to the "Romain" article point to "Le Romain" as well. I was trying to find a good way to link the two articles, but in the end I just ended up putting the link under "See also". I don't think that's enough. Maybe under the "Surname" heading we could put {{see also|Le Romain}}? —Noiratsi (talk) 14:26, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The see also link is a good idea which links both pages well. I have added this to the page now - I hope this is OK. Thanks --Remdabest (talk) 15:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Examiner (1710–1714), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages William III and Whig (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Dragiša Pavlović

Hi, I'm Versace1608. Remdabest, thanks for creating Dragiša Pavlović!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please look for reliable sources to add to this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. versace1608 (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dragiša Pavlović, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Serbian and Yugoslav (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with The Moderate

As the creator of a stub, See Talk:Levellers#Proposed merge with The Moderate -- PBS (talk) 21:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Remdabest. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turkic Boy.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Turkic Boy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:16, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]