User talk:Renamed user 3221277379

Welcome!

Hello, Renamed user 3221277379, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jaco plane 03:58, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joel T. LeFevre

The article Joel T. LeFevre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Blogger and former editors of a small-circulation newsletter - no assertion of notability that would meet WP:GNG. The only secondary sources are two brief mentions n the SPLC website.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Will Beback talk 05:26, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gordon Lee Baum

The article Gordon Lee Baum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Biography of a living person who does not meet the notability criteria for inclusion.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nathan^T 18:20, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Glad

The article John Glad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP, with potentially negative assertions about the subject. A search for reliable sources turned up nothing.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nathan^T 18:28, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gordon Lee Baum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gordon Lee Baum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gordon Lee Baum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nathan^T 22:48, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steven Goldman (sportswriter) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven Goldman (sportswriter) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Goldman (sportswriter) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 11:13, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]