User talk:Renamed user 9nc9f7hfgg/Archive 3
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Military of Nigeria
This isn't helpful. Picaroon (t) 01:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- I disagree. --NEMT (talk) 01:22, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Let me be more specific: This isn't helpful to Wikipedia. Nor are other such edits, which you have made before. Please desist with the vandalism. Picaroon (t) 01:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Let's get one thing straight: that wasn't vandalism, it was a typo. Sorry for gate crashing, but WP:AGF. I'm not speaking Swahili, here. --NEMT (talk) 01:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- I have no intention of getting into a drawn-out argument with you about whether those edits are vandalism; you can think whatever you want. But I do want to make it clear that further such edits, be they "typos" or something else, will result in a block. Picaroon (t) 01:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Bring it OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOON raga! This baby people call a ride, is owned by a friend of mine. --NEMT (talk) 01:49, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- I have no intention of getting into a drawn-out argument with you about whether those edits are vandalism; you can think whatever you want. But I do want to make it clear that further such edits, be they "typos" or something else, will result in a block. Picaroon (t) 01:44, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Let's get one thing straight: that wasn't vandalism, it was a typo. Sorry for gate crashing, but WP:AGF. I'm not speaking Swahili, here. --NEMT (talk) 01:40, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
- Let me be more specific: This isn't helpful to Wikipedia. Nor are other such edits, which you have made before. Please desist with the vandalism. Picaroon (t) 01:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Unhelpfulness = stressed editor?
While I understand that you might feel frustrated from time to time, edits like this are not helpful. If you don't like it here that much, you can always disappear. However, a good number of us would prefer that users with genuine knowledge, or at least access to information, learn the best practices of editing here and contribute effectively. If you're geniunely stressed, consider stepping away for a while so as not to get too emotionally invested in what is not worth your health or sanity. Cheers! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- I was of the impression "Feel free to change the text below this line. No profanity, please." did not imply "but only if it's overtly helpful and factual." --NEMT (talk) 20:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- I think you are just being coy and manipulative. We're just trying to create and maintain a comprehensive encyclopedia here. Why do want to disrupt that process? - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
opertor
im currently off school..
but i will defently have to use that, ive used tor before like, never thought of it on a portable platform.. why wont them editors let me have my freedom of speach.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neochivers (talk • contribs) 21:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/85/Smiley.svg/50px-Smiley.svg.png)
- It was not nonsense, it was an accurate introduction that added to a stub level article. --NEMT (talk) 01:53, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- No it wasn't. JuJube (talk) 03:16, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yes it was. --NEMT (talk) 03:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- No it wasn't. JuJube (talk) 03:16, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Everyone loves the Gambia
Thankyou soooo much for directing me to that :-) Adambisset (talk) 09:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
June 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Milky Way. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hqb (talk) 05:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Agartha. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 17:06, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'd like to point out neither of the edits referenced here were vandalism, but factual, helpful information. Please check again. --NEMT (talk) 23:19, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
If I'm certain? No, I am not... I took the image from the Italian Army homepage and translated the description. As for the image itself: the soldiers are wearing the old pattern combat uniform, which was changed to a new one during 2003-2005. When Italian troops entered Lebanon this conversion was over by a year and so we can conclude that the image must be older. If we look at the weapons we see that the 2 rightmost soldiers carry the Beretta AR70/90 in the SC 70/90 version - the standard weapon for Alpinis and Special Force units (Parachutists carry the SCP 70/90) and the leftmost soldier carries a Steyr AUG only deployed with Italian Special Forces. To conclude: the image shows soldiers of either the 4 Alpini Regiment or the 9th Parachute Assault Regiment which both were deployed in Iraq and were/are at all times deployed to Afghanistan. But which country it is can not be concluded from the image - but I think the Italian Army should know what they write under their images. (The images are changed every other day, so there is no link to it anymore.) --noclador (talk) 10:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
August 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gruel, did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.-- Floaterfluss (talk) (contribs) 23:15, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Charge (warfare)
Red Cavalry had made numerous charges after 1942, the last one I have read about was in Hungary in 1945 I think. They are not documented in Western sources so the Italian charge is commonly reported as the last one. The truth is that we will probably never know which unit and where made the last charge. There were Mongolian cavalry units operating in the Far East in August-September 1945 which also may have charged against the Chinese and Japanese troops, but I can't say with certainty at this time--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 05:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)