User talk:Renata.sarno
Speedy deletion nomination of Blue Cone Monochromacy[edit]
Hello Renata.sarno,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Blue Cone Monochromacy for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Wgolf (talk) 18:50, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 28)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Renata.sarno/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Blue Cone Monochromac[edit]
I have reviewed your new article Blue cone monochromac. It is well constructed and very thorough. However, there are a number of reasons why it is currently a candidate for speedy deletion. Note that I haven't (yet) submitted a speedy delete.
In the past, the article Blue cone monochromatism was created as a redirect. Your attempt to create a full article under this title was reverted by an experienced editor and it still remains as a redirect. Simply by virtue of that article/redirect, your new article should be either deleted or also reduced to a redirect. Although you have already been down that road, it would seem like the best way for your article to appear on Wikipedia. Perhaps there is still scope for that argument to be made on the talk page. Alternatively, if most other editors wish it to remain a redirect, you could expand the article on Monochromacy.
More recently, your article for creation submission with the same title, bar a case change, was rejected. You might consider that was based on a technicality (and it obviously was), but these decisions are taken by very experienced reviewers and rarely turn out to be incorrect. The place to re-create that text is in the existing article/redirect, not a new one. Put simply, the article already exists, albeit only as a redirect. If the article has merit, then the redirect should be expanded. Creating an article with a subtly different title will inevitably be treated as an attempt to circumvent normal editing checks and balances.
A third attempt to create the same article, bar a tiny change in the title, could be considered disruptive editing and lead to you being blocked. You also have an obvious conflict of interest. I realise you have not in any way tried to hide this, but it will always be treated as an indication of possible bias on the subject matter. That is a matter of policy, not in any way a personal indictment. I would like to avoid any drastic outcome such as a ban. Perhaps you could voluntarily request speedy deletion, for example by blanking the content, and pursue this subject as suggested above? Or redirect the new title if you feel it is a valid and likely search term? Lithopsian (talk) 15:06, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, the history is a little confusing. Certainly if you feel the redirect to Monochomacy is not appropriate, or simply that a separate article would be more appropriate, then that is the place to go. A redirect doesn't have to be a precise synonym, but simply sends users searching a particular term to somewhere with relevant information. Often it is sensible so just make an edit (WP:BOLD) and see if other editors want to agree or disagree, help or undo. In this case, it seems to me that you already went down that path, there was discussion, and we are where we are, so it might be seen as less confrontational to start on the talk page of Monochromacy or the redirect to it and see what people think. Editors come and go, opinions evolve. You can point people to your sandbox and show what you would like to do. Or if you think the previous undo of your work was just a random one-off act of a single editor, you could expand the redirect again, but don't get into an edit war. Lithopsian (talk) 16:29, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you Lithopsian, I really appreciate your help !I'll try to talk on the Monochromacy and Blue Cone monochromatism pages ! Renata.sarno (talk) 16:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Blue cone monochromac[edit]
Hello Renata.sarno,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Blue cone monochromac for deletion in response to your request.
If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Lithopsian (talk) 16:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Blue Cone Monochromacy (October 13)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blue Cone Monochromacy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Renata.sarno,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:21, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
|
Draft:Blue Cone Monochromacy concern[edit]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Blue Cone Monochromacy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Blue Cone Monochromacy has a new comment[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Blue cone monochromacy has been accepted[edit]
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! jcc (tea and biscuits) 22:47, 12 September 2017 (UTC)