User talk:RepriseRubric

Notability of Slunt

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Slunt, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Slunt seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Slunt, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 16:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slunt

I disagree, but will restore the article and put it into articles for deletion. See WP:BAND to see whether they qualify. Carlossuarez46 23:21, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked: Your account has been blocked indefinitely on checkuser evidence that you used it to create an account that was later used by a prolific vandal. Cooperating with vandals, even if you do not vandalize yourself, is not welcome. You may post a request to be unblocked but you'd better have a darned good explanation. Thatcher 14:01, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RepriseRubric (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is ludicrous. I frequently edit from the library, so maybe that's why I appeared on CheckUser. But I don't know what this vandal thing you are talking about is.

Decline reason:

Not compelling. — ⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 00:29, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.