User talk:Rev. Reynolds

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Rev. Reynolds, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Rev. Reynolds/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! VViking_TalkEdits 23:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rev. Reynolds/sandbox[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Rev. Reynolds/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. VViking_TalkEdits 23:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User name[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Rev. Reynolds", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a username change that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. VViking_TalkEdits 23:57, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rev. Reynolds/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:41, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Rev. Reynolds, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:41, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Rev. Reynolds/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Rev. Reynolds. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "sandbox".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 13:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Easy Listening Satanic[edit]

The article Easy Listening Satanic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTABILITY - appears to be a "genre" with a single release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 23:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

edit at Easy Listening Satanic[edit]

I think I figured out what you were trying to do with your last two edits at Easy Listening Satanic, and re-did it in more Wikipedia style, adding a "See also" section with a link to Church of Satan. If that doesn't suit your goal, let me know. (Having said that, you may want to review our guidelines on identifying and dealing with conflicts of interest, and seeing if they apply to you for this article.) --Nat Gertler (talk) 01:05, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Satanic International Network[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Satanic International Network, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://www.satanicinternationalnetwork.com/social/forum/topic/733.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:30, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on Wikipedia now. Does this mean that I can finally start writing articles for myself?

Nomination of Easy Listening Satanic for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Easy Listening Satanic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Easy Listening Satanic until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Reverend, I want you to know that there's nothing personal here. I believe your statement that you're passionate about this new genre, and I sincerely wish you success in building it into a powerful musical force with many practitioners. However, Wikipedia is not the place to start new things, it's really the tail end of the process. It isn't good for Wikipedia and it really wouldn't be good for the genre. If your base of information is on Wikipedia, then every damfool with an opinion or wacky idea of what should be said about it can edit it into the article, and they have as much a right to do so as you do (arguably, more, because you have some apparent conflicts of interest, which means you should be editing in accordance with Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines).... and that article would likely be the number one result on Google for the term "Easy Listening Satanic". If, instead, you were to get a domain name (I checked, EasyListeningSatanic.com is still available!) and build up an interesting page with your descriptions and views on the genre, samples of example music, etc., and get a few people to link to it, you might well be able to get the top result be one that is fully under your control, to help nurture this genre in its nascent stage. Wikipedia makes a poor place of promotion for new things. --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:07, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User:NatGertler— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:28, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Oshwah. I would very much like for the link to be seen. I feel that this additional source might be helpful were it to be known to exist.

Good Day,

The Reverend

The reason Oshwah removed it is because you added it to my user page (i.e., primarily a page for me to talk about myself and my editing) instead of my talk page. I am about to reinstate the comment on my talk page, and will respond there after I do. --Nat Gertler (talk) 18:51, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Reynoldsian Faith (December 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Rev. Reynolds/The Reynoldsian Faith and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wia🎄/tlk 00:34, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reynoldsian music[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reynoldsian music requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kolbasz (talk) 23:00, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 23:47, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Reverend: Founder and Star of Reynoldsian and Easy Listening and Satanic Music.[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Reverend: Founder and Star of Reynoldsian and Easy Listening and Satanic Music. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AllyD (talk) 20:47, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

redirect:

https://en.wiki2.org/wiki/The_Reverend:_Founder_and_Star_of_Reynoldsian_and_Easy_Listening_Satanic_Music

Speedy deletion nomination of The Reverend: Founder and Star of Reynoldsian and Easy Listening Satanic Music[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Reverend: Founder and Star of Reynoldsian and Easy Listening Satanic Music requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AllyD (talk) 20:48, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles[edit]

Given that you only appear to be here to promote yourself, and all articles you've created have been deleted as adverts or for not demonstrating notability I'd like to request you stop creating articles about yourself or related topics. If you want to be a Wikipedia editor there are many articles requiring help, but you do not appear to be a valid topic for an article. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 20:53, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. You have been given an extraordinary amount of latitude and all you have done is continue to abuse Wikipedia by making articles intended to promote yourself. I think it is time to bring this to an end. So, this message is intended to reenforce what Sam says above and give it the status of an official final warning. DanielRigal (talk) 20:56, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Reverend and the Conveyors of Planetary Expression[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Reverend and the Conveyors of Planetary Expression requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sjö (talk) 11:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Sam Walton (talk) 12:23, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]