User talk:Reverend Colman Trembley

Welcome![edit]

Hi Reverend Colman Trembley! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Nick Moyes (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dronfield[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your contributions on Coal Aston. Unfortunately, Wikipedia cannot accept the word of anonymous editors as appropriate verification of article content. As an encyclopedia it requires reliable sources that the reader can read. I'll tag the content just now as requiring a source, but it would be good if you could find sources for it. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 19:45, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to find some sources for the Coal Aston wiki but the wiki has never really had any citations for anything, the edit history is mostly comprised of members of the local community adding to the page over time based on lived experiences of the area. Reverend Colman Trembley (talk) 20:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:LordBronSugar per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/LordBronSugar. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 09:47, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Reverend Colman Trembley (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I recently became interested in Wikipedia after looking into the history of my local area and after realising that the Wikipedia sites related to it were missing some information and that they were missing some wiki links to other sites that I thought would have been useful for the average user to be able to access and decided that I would make changes to rectify this. However, because of other accounts vandalising some of the same pages I was working on I’m suspected as being a “sock puppet”. Aside from actually deleting some of the vandalism by other accounts (and adding back lots of valuable information that Wikipedia Admins wrongfully deleted while trying to combat these accounts), all I did on Wikipedia was add wiki links to pages about my local area to make information more accessible, fix some grammatical issues that I noticed on the site, and add missing information about my local history to the site that wasn’t yet present on the site. I have no connection to all the strange accounts that have been attacking Wiki pages related to my local area. I would like to be unblocked since I’ve not done anything wrong, all I’ve done on this site is improve it.Reverend Colman Trembley (talk) 16:28, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The evidence at the SPI was pretty convincing to me. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:08, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.