User talk:Revotfel
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Revotfel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! FlowerpotmaN·(t) 22:54, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Just a quick note - you recently posted your warning for the above user on their userpage. Warnings generally go on the user's talk page, which is at User talk:Hughsgay, for a number of reasons, not least because the user then gets a notification that they have a new message. Thanks! Giles Bennett (Talk, Contribs) 22:30, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Oh geez sorry. I'm still figuring this out. Heck I don't even know how to respond properly on your page. I am reading the guidelines for editing now, sorry about that. --Revotfel 22:36, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Reply to your message[edit]
Yeah, there's a lot of vandalism about. The only thing I would suggest is that you don't get bogged down in vandalism fighting only; there are a lot of maintenance projects at Wikipedia:Maintenance that are worth checking out. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 23:18, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
I'll adopt you![edit]
Do you want me to adopt you? Sorry about having to suddenly leave on IRC. MindstormsKid 00:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks![edit]
Hehe, I try. But Gurch keeps beating me bloody to reverts! Are you new to RC patrolling? Haven't seen you around. Anyway, let me know if I can be of service or anything. Peace, delldot talk 21:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, welcome, and thanks for helping out, as you can see it's greatly needed. Do you have Twinkle yet? delldot talk 21:19, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Dude, you NEED TW. I can mess around with it if you want me to try to get it to work, though I'm not actually good at it and there's a chance I'll reduce it to a smoldering hole. Course then you could just revert me. Private me in the IRC channel if you want while we're working on it. Peace, delldot talk 21:29, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
You're very welcome! I'm just psyched to get another vandal fighting recruit. Especially someone hard core enough to make 150 edits in their first 2 days on the project! See you around in the channel, definitely let me know if you need anything or whatnot. Peace, delldot talk 22:14, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Having Trouble with Twinkle[edit]
After I first installed twinkle I was able to use it fine. After I'd say a bit I noticed it wasn't working anymore. When hitting the rollback vandal thing, it would go through the process, even open up the user's page for the warning thing, take me back to the reverted article.... except it wasn't reverted. Am I going crazy over here? Curiously enough, my popups still work, and I haven't fiddled with my monobook.js since it was working --revotfel★ 23:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Re: Plato's Republic[edit]
Hey, no worries. I wasn't paying attention and undid the edit myself too after you'd done yours. I still haven't figured out how to revert to a previous edit without undoing each individual edit. :x Do you know how? That would help a lot. :) JRDarby 01:43, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Many many many thanks, mate :) That really helps a lot. I appreciate you taking the time out to help me. -- JRDarby (talk) 19:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Image copyright question[edit]
{{helpme}}
I'm writing up an article on Interactive Customer Evaluation (ICE) service. It's website is here http://ice.disa.mil/. I was thinking of adding an image to the article, and I got to this page: http://ice.disa.mil/index.cfm?fa=security
Seeing nothing saying anything about the usage of images from their site, I clicked on the additional information link and ended up here: http://www.defenselink.mil/warning/warn-dl.html
Looking at number 2 it reads: Information presented on DefenseLINK is considered public information and may be distributed or copied unless otherwise specified. Use of appropriate byline/photo/image credits is requested.
I'm afraid my legalise is not up to par, and I can't tell if that's saying I can use an image from the ICE website (considered public information) but then the last sentence threw me off. I thought I'd run it by someone first before uploading the image.
Thanks for any help--revotfel★ 23:21, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- I assume what they're saying is that, as the work of the US federal government, the contents of that website are automatically in the public domain. You can thus upload the images to wikipedia, using the image copyright tag {{PD-USGov}}. It would be appropriate, as the last sentence requests, to indicate the original creator of the image, but this is not a requirement of copyright law. Algebraist 01:33, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
How are you?[edit]
From time to time I remember you... How are you doing? :) ≈ MindstormsKid[citation needed] 18:43, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Survey[edit]
Hi Revotfel!
I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!
It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!
Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!
Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 17:54, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
WikiWomen's Collaborative[edit]
| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Revotfel! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved! |
WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)![edit]
| WikiWomen - We need you! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi Revotfel! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more! Get involved by:
Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 00:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)