User talk:ReyBrujo/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tanis Half-Elven Stub

The article Tanis Half-Elven, which I have been doing much work on, has been greatly improved. Should I take the stub off? I'm not a very good judge of that sort of thing. DoomsDay349 23:40, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [1] -- ReyBrujo 01:52, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Cool. Thanks. DoomsDay349 20:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Dragonlance pages

Do you have a list of dragonlance character pages that need work on? We could split up the work between me, you, doom, and maelwys. However, I don't have ready to access to dragonlance books (except for the doom brigade), because I get most of them from the library. ddcc 01:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [2] -- ReyBrujo 04:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Actually, I have draconian measures, not the doom brigade. Also, I've just noticed that I think the css style sheet notification error thing on your main page is wrong, as it shows the message in both firefox and ie. ddcc 04:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
I also just realized something. I'm moving soon, so I don't have draconian measures available to me right now. ddcc 04:09, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [3] -- ReyBrujo 04:25, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Is there a way to watch all the Dragonlance pages, or do I have to go to each individual page and click watch. Just curious. Thanks.--Kranar drogin 01:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [4] -- ReyBrujo 02:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

This edit

Sorry for reverting this edit; when I was reverting I just reverted his contribution, and didn't see that your edit was in between. Sorry, Master of Puppets FREE BIRD! 02:42, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for being understanding! ^_^ Now back to studying for exams. *grumble* :P Cheers, Master of Puppets FREE BIRD! 02:51, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Edits to Luigi

Hi again. Just wanted to solict your comments, if you've got the time, on the edits I've made to Luigi, since your edits always seem informed and judicious. I'd like to clean up the article to at least "good" status. Since that's what his brother's up to at the moment, it seems only fair. I'm going to try and find a source for the bit about Joust influencing Mario Bros, and and I'll also try to clean up the "powers" section soon, but I'm not sure about the general organization, and what to do with the "voice" section. I'd appreciate your thoughts.

Also, on an unrelated note: how crazy are the newest Wii rumors? :) I'm skeptical of course, but I must admit, it does make me want to keep my fingers crossed. Cheers, -- Lee Bailey(talk) 07:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [5] -- ReyBrujo 15:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Looking forward to your remarks, but do take your time. There's still plenty to do in the article, I'm just a little skittish because I'm making heavy changes without a getting a lot of input back on the article's talk page. I'm not looking for a full peer review necessarilly, just input to see if I'm on the right track with my edits, and any wisdom you may have on organizing this article into appropriate sections. I figured ask you because I've seen you making good edits all over Wikiproject: Nintendo articles. :) The PPU thing seems far fetched to me too, primarilly since we've already seen graphics and gameplay for the major launch titles; I could actually see Nintendo being coy enough to hold back a a major performance-related anouncement until after everyone's gone on record as saying that lack of power is the only thing wrong with the Wii, but it wouldn't be much of an announcenment if everyone's already seen the games in motion. I am expecting more secrets though, and I do love the idea of the simple dev tool for creating and sharing simple games -- now that is completely outside the box. -- Lee Bailey(talk) 12:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [6] -- ReyBrujo 15:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks a bunch for looking this article over. Still a fair deal to be done -- I'm definately still looking to add references, especially for some of the statements that were in the article when I "found" it, in cases where they seem plausible. I'm trying to clean up the wording as much as possible, too. Still a lot to be done, but I feel more confident I'm on the right track now, so again, thanks! :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lee Bailey (talkcontribs) .

Hammer of Kharas

Am I right I am sure there was an old book which they found the hammer also do you know anything about the neutrral dragons thing Jamhaw 20:19, 6 June 2006 (UTC)jamhaw

Replied on the user's talk page. [7] -- ReyBrujo 20:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Okay thanks anyway but I was sure I had read a novel which had them finding the hammer of Kharas but I read it a couple of years ago. Jamhaw 14:50, 7 June 2006 (UTC)jamhaw
Replied on the user's talk page. [8] -- ReyBrujo 15:10, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
Yeah I was sure it was storm something thanks! Jamhaw 15:56, 7 June 2006 (UTC)jamhaw

The image which you reverted back to is wrong, it's the old version which Sony showed off at E3 2005 and ECTS 2006. At E3 2006, a new PS3 was shown to the public([http://www.trustedreviews.com/images/article/inline/2852-ps32.jpg See this image] for what it looks like behind in it's current state). Havok (T/C/c) 11:51, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [9] -- ReyBrujo 02:14, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
I have sent an e-mail to Sony asking for their permission to use the promotional images in the article. We can only cross our fingers that they say yes, seeing as this is "free publicity" they would be silly not to. Havok (T/C/c) 12:09, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [10] -- ReyBrujo 02:14, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

my 2a page

Hi Thanks for your suggestion. It was a sarcastic quip ("why use one word when four will do?") that related back to a similar phrase in the original article! Yeah, maybe it's inappropriate, so I've reversed it as you suggested. Tony 01:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [11] -- ReyBrujo 01:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Goldmoon—well, I have to say that IMV there are too many FACs on fantasies/games. I've looked at the lead. "Became" --> "is" or "was"? "Goldmoon's". The list in the last sentence is clumsy. Use "Tracy and Laura Hickman, and Margaret ...."—do we need to describe her as "his wife"? She stands on her own, surely.

Cheers, Tony 01:56, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [12] -- ReyBrujo 02:09, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

That's good to hear! I'm glad that someone will focus on Argentinian articles. Are you networking to establish collaborators? In particular, there may be Latin Americans living in North America who might offer useful editing support. Tony 02:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Do As Infinity Disc.

Hey, just so you know, I posted a link to the discography page on the DAI talk page.Bakahito 06:33, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

ps3 revert

hello I have no problem with your statment that you don't want "fair use" images as decoration / icons. Please instead change the "silver trim" to a link; I think we all know what "silver" and "trim" is and a picture would be more useful. I don't do much wiki things and I didn't know how to get it to work. Thanks a lot.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=PlayStation_3&diff=58516377&oldid=58516029

Please post something on my talk page. --Gatoatigrado 09:14, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [13] -- ReyBrujo 03:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

ps 3 revert

okay I understand the decorative part; you're right the thumbnail was too small to be useful. I just didn't know the [[:image:whatever]] syntax until I spent a considerable amount of time looking it up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gatoatigrado (talkcontribs) .

I did a quick search for "you" and "I" on that article and could not find a single instance where the formal tone was violated. Is there some other reason why you put {{inappropriate person}}, because I sure can't find it. I even looked in the talk page - no disccusiona about why the tag was put up. If it was just tone in general, {{inappropriate tone}} would have been more aptly suited. Hbdragon88 03:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [14] -- ReyBrujo 03:56, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Apology / world cup squad templates

I must apologise for changing all the 2006 FIFA World Cup Squad Templates without realising that using the football associations' badges was in contravention of the fair use policy. - Phil 15 June 2006, 08:35 (UTC)

I think Image:Escudo de España.svg is not a fair use image, but public domain, therefore it may be used freely, unlike the others.  SLUMGUM  yap  stalk  11:36, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Well I had guessed that the Spanish FA image wasn't available at all so decided to use the national coat of arms. In fact I found it here Real Federación Española de Fútbol, but like the others it comes under the fair use policy. - Phil 15 June 2006, 12:52 (UTC)

"Removing NN site"?

Hi. I posted the link to Spacepope4u's Mario series character guide. Can I ask why you deleted the link? And what does "NN site" mean? Kidicarus222 03:23, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [15] -- ReyBrujo 03:36, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Taladas

I've recently rewritten a bit of the Taladas article, can you tell me what you think and any suggestions? Thanks. ddcc 03:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [16] -- ReyBrujo 03:56, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Btw, the second book has already been released, called Trail of the Black Wyrm. ddcc 04:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [17] -- ReyBrujo 04:11, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Ok, and when you're done with the book, can you peer edit the Blades of the Tiger page? ddcc 02:06, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [18] -- ReyBrujo 02:18, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Pokemon

I don't remember, what did I do? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 201.23.64.2 (talkcontribs) .

Replied on the user's talk page. [19] -- ReyBrujo 18:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Dvd-stub

Hi Rey

Welcome to the world of stubs. I've moved your deletion request to the correct location (WP:SFD). You might find these links handy in the future: Stub templates are proposed on WP:WSS/P. Deletion or renaming of existing stub templates or categories takes place at WP:SFD. A stub template tagged for deletion is tagged with {{sfr-t|Dvd-stub}} Had it been a stub category, just replace the "-t" with "-c". Newly discussed stub templates are normally listed at WP:WSS/D first, but if it is a hopeless case, we go straight to WP:SFD. I hope you don't find this all to confusing. If you have any questions feel free to ask. Regards. Valentinian (talk) 19:59, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [20] -- ReyBrujo 20:07, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
No problem :) Valentinian (talk) 20:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Weyard map

Greetings. As you know I've been working on Golden Sun articles for a long while. If you know how the image licensing/copyright business works then I have something for you to investigate: I've had an image named Image:GSWeyard.jpg uploaded and in use on the Weyard page for a few days, and now I've uploaded the proper Image:GSWeyard2.jpg, and am letting the original be deleted. Could you or someone else help me find the right licensing with the new image? Thanks. Erik the Appreciator 02:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [21] -- ReyBrujo 02:36, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, sure, I would have to upload just what it was originally. But the cropping... If you mean how the top and bottom sections are cut off, I'm afraid that was unavoidable (the Epson scanner isn't wide enough. But isn't there an art tag of some sort? But anyway, yeah, I'll upload the unedited version. Erik the Appreciator 02:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [22] -- ReyBrujo 02:45, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
I've uploaded it as Image:GSWeyard3.jpg and described it like you said. Now I think it's all proper, so now the other two image attempts can be deleted. Erik the Appreciator 04:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Replied on user's talk page. [23] -- ReyBrujo 04:24, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Possible Copyright Violation on Kith-Kana Silvanos

That page appears to be almost an exact copy from the DL Nexus, and so should I flag it as a copyright violation? If so, we have one week to clean it up right? ddcc 03:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [24] -- ReyBrujo 04:02, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Talk:Mario archive

See, I would move it back if I could, but since I pasted in the headers, I have created an edit history for the article, which prevents me from moving it back. What do you think, should it be left there or should a request be put in requested moves? — SheeEttin {T/C} 18:06, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [25] -- ReyBrujo 18:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Dragonlance image

This is just a heads up that if you're going to upload any dragonlance images, please place them in the [[Category:Dragonlance images]] or the [[Category:Dragonlance Covers]]. Thanks. ddcc 01:08, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Thought you'd like to know

Thought you'd like to know that the band The Black Mages makes heavy/progressive metal versions of Final Fantasy songs, which if you like Nightwish you'll definatly like those. By the way I'm from Argentina as well, we sure got those mexicans xD.--L337M4G3 3:14 25/6/06

Questions

Would you like to be an admin?

How come I can't see your userpage properly in Safari? Grandmasterka 09:07, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [26] -- ReyBrujo 14:44, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Further comment in the user's talk page. [27] -- ReyBrujo 04:42, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Looks good now. By the way, your English is WAY better than my Spanish, and I've been calling myself borderline advanced in Spanish. You should think about en-4. Grandmasterka 07:41, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Firefox Stylesheet

I think I might have told you before, on Firefox in Windows 2k Pro, your page says that I need to login to see templates. I'm not sure what template is specified, as I can see the regular wikipedia template. ddcc 03:34, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [28] -- ReyBrujo 03:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Further comment in the user's talk page. [29] -- ReyBrujo 04:38, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure how to handle this

Hey ReyBrujo. I was RC Patrolling and I found an article that I really don't know what to do with. I'm not sure if it should be put up for speedy deletion, or put into the AFD (quite frankly, I have no idea how the AFD works). So, I'll link it here and maybe you can figure out what to do with it. The article is Your Team!. Thanks. DoomsDay349 18:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [30] -- ReyBrujo 19:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Further comment on the user's talk page. [31] -- ReyBrujo 19:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
I've put it up for deletion. DoomsDay349 19:01, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [32] -- ReyBrujo 19:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
So, could you tell me what'll happen next? DoomsDay349 19:25, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [33] -- ReyBrujo 19:41, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Your post on the Game Boy Line page

Hello! I hope you're doing well. I noticed your post on the post about Nintendo and Atari, and I posted a reply to it on that page. May I venture the guess that you, too, are a fan of "classic gaming" history, as I am? If you are, I hope you find the link on the page interesting. Cheers! Ex-Nintendo Employee 05:24, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Chrono Trigger images

Why are these being deleted? There's a license on them. The artwork is by Akira Toriyama. What else cen be added to them to make sure they stay? The images are needed for the Chrono Trigger articles, and as you know, we want to get them up to snuff. Deleting the images will hinder us. If they are deleted, I will simply have to reupload them. Crazyswordsman 16:12, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [34] -- ReyBrujo 16:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
See [[Image:Lucca in chrono trigger.jpg]],. It was deleted from Lucca (Chrono Trigger), even though it has Fair Use rationale. If something is missing, could you add it, please? I don't want to see the Chrono Trigger project go down the tubes because of this. Several others were tagged by User:OrphanBot. Crazyswordsman 17:31, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [35] -- ReyBrujo 18:10, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm not the original uploader. But my best bet is to try to contact the person who uploaded them. (He doesn't seem to be around anymore). Unfortunately, I don't have the instruction manual or anything related to it, and I suck at scanning. So these images will have to go for now, I guess (I believe highly in WP:POINT, and will not reupload them for a month after. It helps me in my argument against admins who take Jimbo's words out of context sometimes and use them to justify actions that are highly unpopular). I should try to convince the owner of that Bot that the images are needed for the Chrono Trigger featuring project.
About images on my user page: I'll delete them if I must, but I want to tell people of my contributions. How else am I supposed to tell people of my contributions, including the images that were needed and I uploaded? Crazyswordsman 21:56, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [36] -- ReyBrujo 22:15, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

My adminship

Greetings. I appreciate your concern expressed regarding my nomination for adminship. --HolyRomanEmperor 20:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [37] -- ReyBrujo 20:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
I think you have misinterpreted my post - I really wasn't complaining about your vote, I was trully expressing gratitude for Your concerns. --HolyRomanEmperor 20:39, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [38] -- ReyBrujo 20:48, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

ps3 controller

hi rey you've added some nice opinions; please read and comment on the ps3 controller in the talk pages if you have a moment. thanks. --Gatoatigrado 21:56, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Ps3 controller, and politeness

I'm sorry to be such a pain in disagreeing with you over the controller section. However I find this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3APlayStation_3&diff=61618776&oldid=61617265 insulting and inpolite. Could you comment on that?HappyVR 14:55, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [39] -- ReyBrujo 18:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

English re:PS3 discussion

You really are a pain. Attempting to talk to you is mostly impossible. Your sentence construction and grammar are faultless - but your understanding of English is not. I would suggest that you should concentrate on editing a version of Wikipedia in your native tongue. Trying to discuss things with you is like arguing with a monkey. I am sure that you are not that stupid but believe me you do not actually speak English. I'm sorry to say this but this is the conclusion I have come to. I do not want to waste any more time talking to someone whose grasp of English is not good enough to understand what I am saying. Sorry.HappyVR 18:25, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [40] -- ReyBrujo 18:36, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

I just reverted your formating on this category. Please see it's talk page entry for my reasoning. — xaosflux Talk 21:20, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the category talk page. [41] -- ReyBrujo 21:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the speedy reply; I certainly understand the fair use requirements' and think that page is a good exception; is there an existing category/template that can be used to tag a apge as a fair-use exemption? (please reply on my talk or at CSD talk) — xaosflux Talk 21:35, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the category talk page. [42] -- ReyBrujo 21:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Substitution of {{unsigned}}

In this edit, you substitute {{unsigned}} with the edit summary "Substituting unsigned template per substitution guidelines". I'm just tipping you off to the fact that I've disputed the routine substitution of those templates; you might want to look at Wikipedia talk:Template substitution#unsigned and Unisgned2 and comment there. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 22:23, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [43] -- ReyBrujo 22:36, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

J-caps

I've put a notice onto Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs#J-pop songs about the capitalization of J-pop singles. Please register an opinion there so that this can be evaluated. Thanks!--Mike Selinker 15:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Added a comment in the project talk page. [44] -- ReyBrujo 15:51, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

nogallery

What is the point of putting nogallery on all of the Images with unknown copyright status articles? I like to review these galleries for images that appear likely to be PD-US, and I need to see the images. Was this discussed somewhere? TIA, -- Mwanner | Talk 23:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [45] -- ReyBrujo 02:51, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. Your third link includes the line "category for fair use exemptions, as pages required to operate the project", which seems to suggest that nogallery will not be applied to those pages, as exemptions under FUC #9? In any case, I have figured out a workaround for now, simply deleting nogallery (without saving) and using Show preview to see the thumbnails. So while I hope the consensus is to drop nogallery, I can live with it either way. Cheers! -- Mwanner | Talk 12:27, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [46] -- ReyBrujo 13:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

"Conclusion, not topic"

Hi. I'm still unclear about what you meant in this edit. Would you mind explaining what your thinking is? Jkelly 20:48, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [47] -- ReyBrujo 21:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the clarification. I worry about a tendency towards immediacy in these conversations. Often the best way to get a freely-licensed image is to have no image in the article, not to have an attractive unfree one. Jkelly 21:14, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [48] -- ReyBrujo 21:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi, I'm just thanking you warning me about the fair use images. I have deleted them. --Llama man 05:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Changes to Freeza

I'm not done yet, but a change for the better, and hopefully one of the better DBZ articles on Wikipedia (though those standards aren't too lofty) so far? I've addressed several concerns and will probably be making futher changes by need (like cites for fair-use) to see how close it can get to WP:GA soon. Voice of Treason 02:20, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [49] -- ReyBrujo 02:37, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry --- I understand

The removing of my WiiBo! www.WiiBo.com NES forum @ the NES page, sorry I readded it!

Peace! Matt --EmmSeeMusic 06:12, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [50] -- ReyBrujo 06:18, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks --

Still gettin' a hang of this Wiki stuff! I put the Talk that I deleted back in, thanks for the help again.

Peace, Matt --EmmSeeMusic 06:21, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

The / Articles

Thank you for pointing that out; that makes for much ease. I wasn't aware the main article space did that. I appreciate it :) Happy editing to you! Teke 07:17, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

tango

Question

I have a question,in the [[chrono cross] article in unofficial links you took off a link to a forum board that is about chrono cross and other, is there a reason why you took it off? becuase it did have chrono cross in it so i would not know why you took it off. some guy named bob —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 152.163.100.197 (talkcontribs) .

Replied on the user's talk page. [51] -- ReyBrujo 20:59, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

You (Kumi Koda song)

Hello ReyBrujo, I saw you reverted an edit I made on the You (song) article.: 23:04 . . ReyBrujo (Talk | contribs) (Reverted to version as of 02:49, 19 June 2006, please do not just copy the page, move the contents otherwise the history of the page is deleted.) I was wondering if you could tell me how to move the history of the page, would it need a request for a move and then an admin to do that or are there other ways? The article You (song) should become a redirect or disambiguation page since several songs were named "you". Best regards, Brz7 10:23, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [52] -- ReyBrujo 15:23, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Re:Fictional characters by hair color

Hi. The categories have now been deleted, so this may be a moot point, but when I closed the discussion, I listed the categories in the "empty and delete" section of Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Working. Items there are typically handled by bots, but there's been a bit of a backlog, so it took a few days for them to be cleared out. Thanks for keeping your eyes open! - EurekaLott 04:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [53] -- ReyBrujo 04:50, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

BOND

Hi. Saw the copyright notice. I wrote that orginal content on the other site mentoned for copyright and its a mirror of my orginal content. I wrote some new content anyway. New content at : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:BOND/Temp Dru. -- 210.48.82.11 12:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Keiko Kitagawa's screen name

It mentions a Yahoo screen name right here http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/kitagawakeiko2006/ On the left-hand pane of the blog. WhisperToMe 16:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [54] -- ReyBrujo 18:05, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

I took care of those CT images you complained about.

It's in the heading. Crazyswordsman 19:50, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [55] -- ReyBrujo 20:18, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Fael-Thas

Just wondering if you noticed, there's already a section called 'Feal-Thas' in the minor DL characters page. You may want to merge them in some way. ^^ --Masamage 19:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [56] -- ReyBrujo 19:57, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Oops, sorry, it's just the normal DL Characters page. There's a Feal-Thas already, and you added Fael-thas a few minutes ago. I'm pretty sure your spelling is the right one.--Masamage 20:00, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [57] -- ReyBrujo 20:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Glad to help! :D --Masamage 20:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Edits to Nintendo

Acording to your reasoning for the revert on Nintendo, you stated that years could not be linked by themselves, but onWikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) above the section you referenced makes it clear that you can link years alone given the correct format. User:Lord Hawk 16:59, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [58] -- ReyBrujo 17:15, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Teamwork

Heya, just wanted to say hello, since it seems that we're working next to each other on the "new article" pipeline. :) I often see your name as "last edited", when I'm working on the "K" letter in Category:Category needed. Just out of curiosity, what's the next stop upstream from you? Or in other words, where do you usually check for the new articles, as you tag them? --Elonka 21:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [59] -- ReyBrujo 22:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Heh, no need to apologize! I think we make a good team. I actually enjoy the categorizing part, though I was curious sometimes how I could put hours into "K" on one day to clean it out, only to come back a few hours later and see there were 20 more articles waiting for me! Now that I understand more of the process though, it makes more sense. I have to admit, it also makes me smile whenever I see someone complaining that "No one is working on new articles anymore." They're not seeing the side of Wikipedia that you and I are seeing! Keep up the great work, Elonka 22:09, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Template status.

What was the outcome of the effort to standardize the templates used in album articles? --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 18:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [60] -- ReyBrujo 18:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
How does the new template work? --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 11:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [61] -- ReyBrujo 18:11, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
I would really appreciate it if you could show me exactly how the template works... --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 18:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [62] -- ReyBrujo 20:49, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
How exactly can I change the default color? --Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 22:25, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [63] -- ReyBrujo 01:03, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm good. It works fine, and I changed one of the hues so that it no longer causes me grief. Cheers, Folajimi (leave a note) 01:57, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [64] -- ReyBrujo 02:09, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Infobox

Hey ReyBrujo, I brought up the topic of a DL infobox for organizations in DL on your tasklist page, but I wanted to ask you a few general questions first. First off, does it have to be proposed on the proposal page? Second, that page said you can't use the same color for infoboxes, which I don't understand as theres only like a hundred colors, so how could they not all be used already? I'm a little confused by their directions, so if you could give me a general guide on infoboxes it'd be really appreciated. DoomsDay349 02:25, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [65] -- ReyBrujo 17:59, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Signing UserTalk

I assume this was just an oversight. --Porqin 17:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [66] -- ReyBrujo 17:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
I was more than certain it was an oversight, as I scrolled up on the page and saw your signature. It looks better for you to add your signature, than me adding an unsigned tag to your edit :-) --Porqin 17:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Adjudicate Gran Turismo intro, okay?

You added "shorten intro" to Gran Turismo (game). Someone shortened it, but didn't remove the tag, and so I shortened it again. Can you come back, and adjudicate what you started. Likely my super-shortening wasn't necessary, although I still feel there's a lot of non-summary in the previous shortening. I think my intro says all one (a disinterested observer) needs to know, and nothing more. Like the other person, I feel silly doing the shortening and removing the tag myself. Perhaps others will feel the intro should be deshortened a little.--SportWagon 21:51, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [67] -- ReyBrujo 04:33, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Dita

Why the sudden interest in this image? Those images have been there for more than a year now, and nobody has said anything, not even members of the Anime and Manga project. The image is not too big, it is just right. As for your 250px comment, well, duh, of course the image isn't used full-size within the main article. 250px is pretty much standard for image thumbnail sizes, and if people want to see a bigger version they can click on it. They don't want to click on a thumbnail and see the same small image. That's just common sense right there. I went to a tremendous amount of trouble searching out just the right frames to represent the essence of each character, and the image needs to be at least big enough for the details to be legible.

Edit: Okay, I uploaded a version that is only 500 pixels wide. Is this sufficient? If so, I can go ahead and do it for all of the images. PiccoloNamek 03:24, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [68] -- ReyBrujo 03:32, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

So, is 800 pixels a number that you arbitrarily came up with? I noticed that you said you browse at 1024x786. If that is the case, the image may look rather large to you, but I browse at 1600x1200, and it looks small to me, even at full size. Further more, a single still frame, and not a particularly high quality one at that, out of tens of thousands of total frames, certainly does not inhibit CLAMP's/Madhouse's/Pioneer's(Geneon's, rather)/TokyoPop's/Whoever's ability to sell Chobits DVDs, manga, or merchendise. PiccoloNamek 03:39, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [69] -- ReyBrujo 03:52, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Korean Language Institute

I cited the source of the paragraph. How else should I have done it? Chadlupkes 17:09, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [70] -- ReyBrujo 17:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Ok, if we make those changes, can we prevent the article from being deleted? I created it in the first place because it was at the top of the "Most Wanted" list, but since I have no knowledge of the subject, I just did a search and put in what I could along with references. I understand standards, and I understand the need for copyright protections. But automatically declaring that anything copied and not formatted properly is grounds for deletion and possible blocking of the user is really discouraging to people who just want to be involved. Chadlupkes 19:31, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [71] -- ReyBrujo 19:38, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Haven't heard of a temporal page. Is there a help page showing an example? Chadlupkes 13:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [72] -- ReyBrujo 15:58, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

The information for this article seems to have been picked from www.kittybrewster.com/members/j.htm, which does not inform if that information is public domain or copyrighted (the terms of use are really vague). Could you rewrite the article to prevent giving a positive again? Thanks. -- ReyBrujo 14:35, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes - my site. All that info is public domain (Burke's Peerage, "Who's Who" [http://www.thepeerage.com The Peerage] etc - Kittybrewster 16:22, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [73] -- ReyBrujo 17:22, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
No. Because most of the info on my sites is not public domain. But the info re HG,3VG certainly is. I am inclined to ask do we need to worry about it? - Kittybrewster 17:27, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [74] -- ReyBrujo 18:06, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

FLCL Improvement Drive

ReyBrujo, I noticed you recent edits to a FLCL page (you may have also made others). In that you purport and are a fan of manga and anime, I would request that you cast a vote on Wikipedia:Article Improvement Drive for FLCL and help bring this budding family of pages to featured-article status. FLCL is considered by many to be complete nonsense but other, more weathered anime veterans can recognize its deep symbolic values which only need a collaborated effort to be polished to a maximum shine. Thanks. --Gunblade 02:23, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Chrono Cross

I just finished editing through use of a hard copy of the article, and tons of fat have been melted away to leave a crisp product. I'm making the rounds on a few editors' talk pages to invite them to give the article a glance. Once Chrono Trigger is locked in FA, Chrono Cross should be next. I've put some serious hours into it, so I think with a little more polish by fresh eyes, we'll be ready to unload. Long live the Chrono series. --Zeality 19:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Calling programmers

We need coders for the WikiProject Disambigation fixer. We need to make a program to make faster and easier the fixing of links. We will be happy if you could check the project. You can Help! --Neo139 08:47, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the Project's page. [75] -- ReyBrujo 16:24, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Gracias Argentina--Neo139 10:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Please sign your posts

I think you're fighting a losing battle there :P -- Steel 14:28, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [76] -- ReyBrujo 14:31, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning Article

In regards to your recent edits to the Warhammer Online: Age of Reckoning article, the majority of the content of the article has been taken from http://www.war-rvr.net (as mentioned in my feeble attempts at a discussion page, thanks for the editing). I'd really value your help as to what I can do to remove our content without totally destroying the page but also ensuring that noone else comes through and just reverts to a version that again has our articles in it. Culain 22:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [77] -- ReyBrujo 23:16, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your reply ReyBrujo, as a long time wikipedia VIEWER but not user it can be really daunting trying to get into this crazy editing thing, so thanks for being helpful and nice! I posted a list of links to our content in the discussion page for the article. I guess the most obvious thing that shows that its ours is that the content was first added to wikipedia all at once by someone who INCLUDED citation to our site, then the citation was removed by another user, because they thought that our site was trying to advertise :(. In the discussion I've posted each heading that is solely copywrited work, and the section that it was taken from. I would really value your assistance in removing it, as I've tried twice now and probably messed it up (it keeps being reverted back). -- Culain 23:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [78] -- ReyBrujo 23:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks very very much! -- Culain 00:02, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks again ReyBrujo, can't state enough how grateful i am for your help -- Culain 14:26, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

quick question

do you know how to prevent embedded

<span style="font-size:0.9em;">smaller font<span style="font-size:0.9em;">even smaller</span></span>

smaller fonteven smaller

from being recursive? I'd like to use that instead of "pt" on my website so users can resize it, but I have a lot of recursive elements and I'd like to use a concise stylesheet. --gatoatigrado 00:03, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [79] -- ReyBrujo 00:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
"smaller" is .9 and "even smaller" is .9 * .9 on Firefox and Internet Explorer. I want the "even smaller" to be .9 of the default font, not the "parent" element. thanks. Image:Embedded_em_screenshot.png. --gatoatigrado 14:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [80] -- ReyBrujo 16:00, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
guess this explains it pretty well. [http://www.multimedia-engineer.nl/2006/01/18/font-sizes-in-css-em-ex-px-mm-cm-in-pt-pc/]. I guess I'll use px. Now firefox and ie scale pt as well, so I guess it's no problem. In my stylesheet I wanted to do
td, p, ul, li, span
{
   font-size:relative_to_global;
}
and have (of course) li's within ul's, etc. --gatoatigrado 16:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
just wondering, do you know why firefox's image scaling is so bad? --gatoatigrado 16:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [81] -- ReyBrujo 17:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

References

Hey. I had a question about referencing, the way you do it, for example in Goldmoon, all those statements with a small number after them that go down to a box on the bottom that contain a reference, how do you do that? Cause I've been meaning to do that with Blue Lady's War, I can't really do it with other pages yet cause I don't own all the novels pertaining to them, for example Tanis Half-Elven. Thanks. DoomsDay349 01:40, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [82] -- ReyBrujo 02:11, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Thanks, god its annoying filling all those sections in. I added one already, I'll do more later. DoomsDay349 02:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Dragons of Autumn Twilight

Hey ReyBrujo, I'm planning on fixing up the Dragons of Autumn Twilight article, but in order to be able to work on it without disrupting the page, I'm planning on getting the article pretty much done on my sandbox and then copy/pasting it. I'd appreciate your help! I know you're probably busy with something, but any contribution you could make would be greatly appreciated. Thanks again! DoomsDay349 04:19, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [83] -- ReyBrujo 05:50, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Alright, cool. Really, though, there hasn't been much work on the article. I'll post what I have there then. DoomsDay349 01:06, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
I moved some section, the easy ones like plot and characters. I could really use your help on some of the harder ones, so please help out if you have time. Thanks. DoomsDay349 01:31, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [84] -- ReyBrujo 01:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
Sounds good. DoomsDay349 01:48, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Nightwish

The Original Barnstar
I've noticed your tireless work and vast improvements on articles like Nightwish. Time after time you prove to be able to enhance the encyclopedia with your inexaustible wikispirit. Keep the soul alive ;D (although...metal is a better description in this case, but that's just a minor thing)—♦♦ SʘʘTHING(Я) 17:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [85] -- ReyBrujo 02:44, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
I'll be looking forward to that addition to Tarja's article. In addition, I'll look for a free license picture to put up there. There's so much free Tarja stuff available. I'm also in the process of getting one for Nightwish. Cool, huh?—♦♦ SʘʘTHING(Я) 18:44, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey, It's Dragonball1986

Teach me exactly hot to edit and place images on stuff. Thank You —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dragonball1986 (talkcontribs) .

Replied on the user's talk page. [86] -- ReyBrujo 23:22, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Advance Wars external links

In the interest of not revert warring, let us discuss here.

The merits for including each of the 5 sites on the AWDS page are as follows:

GameFAQs: It's GameFAQs. It will have guides, reviews, and a large if low-quality message board. Also, GameFAQs will have a section for pretty much every game ever, so it makes a good starting point for anyone looking for info on a game.

Advance Wars Net: As stated in the description, the first and largest AW fansite, speaks for itself.

Advance Wars by Web: This one I'm not so sure about, as it may break copyright law. Remove?

Advance Wars Revival: Not so sure about this one either, it seems rather small. It does have a lot of guides though.

Advance Wars Bunker: Was previously the largest AW fansite, isn't anymore. Is massively, massively larger than any of the other fansites on the list, barring Advance Wars Net. Also has lots of members who claim it's unfair to include AWN but not AWB.

--tjstrf 04:46, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [87] -- ReyBrujo 05:19, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
In which case, my (slightly biased) opinion would be the keeping of GameFAQs, AWN, and AWB, or GameFAQs and AWN. "Active" is a vague term at best, as it could mean number of members posting on the forums per day, total forums posts per day, how often the staff updates the site, number of pageviews, or some combination of them all. Membership size is probably a better measure there. --tjstrf 05:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [88] -- ReyBrujo 05:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Hmm... what we really need is to resolve the underlying problem. A few months ago, I had this discussion with another user, and we trimmed about 6 sites which had little or no membership, leaving approximately the list we have now, the only sites with any claim to notability whatsoever.
I know that in certain manga and anime series articles, we have solved the problem of constant link or list bloating by adding an invisible note ("!" tagged text that shows up when editing only) saying that a list was considered complete and should not be added to. Perhaps that would work here as well? --tjstrf 05:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Replied on the user's talk page. [89] -- ReyBrujo 06:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
It works better than you'd think, actually. Even fans will read, and will generally obey. We use them on the Bleach (manga) article, for instance. We have 2 there, one saying not to add extra people to the list of main characters, and another saying no fansites. (We decided to not allow any, due to copyright concerns.) We've only had to deal with people adding fansite links or extra "main characters" 2 or 3 times since, and we had previously bee reverted those sections multiple times per week. All you have to do is put it right at the end of the fan links, they will see it. It also gives you a justification for immediate removal, rather than having to explain the reasoning to every IP editor who won't read the talk page.
So, how about we try the following for now: GameFAQs templated, AWB and AWN included, and a notice saying to not add any more. If that doesn't work, we can always try something else. --tjstrf 07:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Signing for others

Re [90]: In some cases, I think it can be construed as impolite to use {{unsigned}}. That's why I chose to sign for him without using that template. --Durin 01:30, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Replied on the user's talk page. [91] -- ReyBrujo 01:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your support (the RfA succeeded), as well as your useful comments. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 04:19, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

I just wanted to let you know, since you edited it at least once, that it is now nominated as a featured article. It might not make it since it still needs some more work. Thanks. Steve Dufour 18:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)