User talk:Rfbarrington

Welcome!

Hello, Rfbarrington, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Internet Movie Database Top 250, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bulldog ^{talk da contribs go rando} 18:24, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Internet Movie Database Top 250

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Internet Movie Database Top 250 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bulldog ^{talk da contribs go rando} 18:24, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

October 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Aliens (film), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Carl Sixsmith (talk) 12:31, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Supporting statements with citations

Hi. If you add to an article a declarative statement such as "It is often considered one of the greatest movies ever", you must support it with a citation from a reliable source, otherwise it is considered to be merely your opinion or perception, which is original research and not allowed. Such unsupported statements will, most likely, be removed, so if you want your contributions to remain in the articles, please find a supporting source. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:49, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Eyes Shut

There are no major film critics who consider Eyes Wide Shut to be pornography in the strict sense of the word, although some critics consider in "erotica". Without a significant secondary source to establish it as such, it is inappropriate to enter material into WP characterizing it as pornographic. You might consult Erotica#Erotica_and_pornography.--WickerGuy (talk) 18:17, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Redux

Four editors have reverted your persistent attempts to characterize Eyes Wide Shut as pornographic. Critics generally agree that portrayal of sexual immorality as such does not per se make a film pornographic. Please observe the rules of WP:CONSENSUS and cease and desist from further attempts to make this edit.--WickerGuy (talk) 22:43, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Hello and welcome! Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite reliable references or sources, or discuss it on the article's talk page. Thank you! Tgeairn (talk) 22:46, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:WhenTheWindBlowsDVD1986.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:WhenTheWindBlowsDVD1986.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:WhenTheWindBlowsDVD1986.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WhenTheWindBlowsDVD1986.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 11:14, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

April 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Ray William Johnson does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! 117Avenue (talk) 04:08, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Richard-pryor-live-on-the-sunset-strip-movie-poster-1982-1020467447.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Richard-pryor-live-on-the-sunset-strip-movie-poster-1982-1020467447.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Current/Past Members of the Beatles

There is a straw poll taking place here, and your input would be appreciated. — GabeMc (talk) 00:27, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

July 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing. --John (talk) 22:49, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Justin A. Foley

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Justin A. Foley, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.justinfoley.ca/Home.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:06, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Justin A. Foley

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Justin A. Foley, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.justinfoley.ca/Home.html. As a copyright violation, Justin A. Foley appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Justin A. Foley has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Justin A. Foley and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Justin A. Foley with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Justin A. Foley.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 03:18, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

January 2013

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Kayau (talk · contribs) 12:21, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of My Little Pony: Equestria Girls: The Movie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Little Pony: Equestria Girls: The Movie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Little Pony: Equestria Girls: The Movie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Intelligent Deathclaw (talk) 21:56, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Don't hug me I'm scared

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Don't hug me I'm scared requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jinkinson talk to me 17:18, 28 February 2014 (UTC)