User talk:Rich Smith/Archive5
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Rich Smith. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 13 June 2011
- News and notes: Wikipedians 90% male and largely altruist; 800 public policy students add 8.8 million bytes; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Aircraft
- Featured content: Featured lists hit the main page
- Arbitration report: More workshop proposals in Tree shaping case; further votes in PD of other case
- Technology report: 1.18 extension bundling; mobile testers needed; brief news
Abuse report.
Hey. Haven't talked to you in a while. I should be a contactor on this report since I'm a abuse report member. Is that ok?--Damirgraffiti ☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 20:33, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
- Absolutely fine by me :) - Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 02:02, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, then I"ll add myself and update the report and I"ll be ready to contact!--Damirgraffiti ☺Say Yo to Me!☺ 04:48, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:38, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 June 2011
- News and notes: WMF Board election results; Indian campus ambassadors gear up; Wikimedia UK plans; Malayalam Wikisource CD; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Elemental WikiProject
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: One case comes to a close; initiator of a new case blocked as sockpuppet
Re: Had to laugh
LOL, true actually haha. -- sandgemADDICT yeah? 10:27, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
CB3
It died again. --The Σ talkcontribs 21:02, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- Danke - Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 21:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
ACC Confirm
This edit hereby confirms that I duly request an ACC account. Thanks - Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 11:43, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
ACC
Methecooldude thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request so welcome to the team. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide thoroughly to familiarize yourself with the process.
You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on IRC where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and to get any advice on requests as well as the mailing list. Please note that we have implemented a policy of zero tolerance on mishandled requests, and that failure to assess correctly will result in suspension. I would like to emphasize that it is not a race to complete a request, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly.
- Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, although you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked "Account Creator Needed" by the bot and "Flagged user needed" in the tool. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM.
Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse will result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome!
P.S. disregard last email :P
Mlpearc powwow 16:28, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 June 2011
- WikiProject report: The Continuous Convention: WikiProject Comics
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision for Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
RfA
I observed you made an RfA. I also observed you haven't done too much article related stuff, which may be a barrier to your success. In any case, good luck. --The Σ talkcontribs 21:40, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- By the way, CB3 stopped working. --The Σ talkcontribs 21:43, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- At some point your RFA will be closed early. Before that, people will pile on telling you that you are not ready. You'd need to build up more experience before being able to pass at RfA. It's up to you, but it might be an idea to withdraw your nomination now and try again in 6 months or a year's time. SilkTork *Tea time 22:11, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Fair enough. - Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 22:12, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Don't be down on yourself about it, though. I think just a couple months of putting yourself out there and broadening your areas of participation will be enough to turn the next RFA into a successful one. Trusilver 22:23, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Fair enough. - Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 22:12, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- At some point your RFA will be closed early. Before that, people will pile on telling you that you are not ready. You'd need to build up more experience before being able to pass at RfA. It's up to you, but it might be an idea to withdraw your nomination now and try again in 6 months or a year's time. SilkTork *Tea time 22:11, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Rich, sorry I had to oppose your RfA. This doesn't mean your vandal-fighting work isn't appreciated; I hope you will keep up the good work there, and as others have suggested, try out new and exciting areas of the 'pedia, like article-building ('cause that's why we're all here!) Anyway, don't take it personally – my first RfA was unsuccessful too, and I found (some of) what the opposers had to say helpful in becoming a better editor; hopefully you will too. Best, 28bytes (talk) 22:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yay! Someone who calls me by my name! WikiLove to you... anyway, article-building has never been my thing and anything I add would highly likely get reverted anyway. Anti-vandalism has always been what I've wanted to do on the 'pedia and hence why I started there. If you can suggest anything for me to get involved in with relation to this, then please do! Thanks for your kind words - Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 22:55, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Well, there's absolutely nothing wrong with vandal-fighting. Without the editors and bots who clean up after the vandals, the encyclopedia would collapse into complete junk in no time. My advice: do what you enjoy doing. If vandal-fighting's your thing, just keep on trucking with that. You probably won't be able to gain adminship without at least some article work, but there are plenty of respected non-admins on this site who are doing what they love. If you do decide you want to branch out into content creation, my advice would be to pick an area that interests you, and see what's not in the encyclopedia, but should be. For example, pop songs are an interest of mine, so I visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/List of notable songs to see what notable songs don't have articles yet, and if I like the song, I dig up some sources and create an article. Ditto with video games... lots of red links still in List of Atari 2600 games, for example. 28bytes (talk) 23:10, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- And like I said in the RFA, using article building as a means to judge someone suitable to adminship is downright absurd. I had only worked a single article to good status and I was able to pass RFA. Now, I also had started a Wikiproject too, which I'm sure gave me points, but the most important thing that I did... the part that was most often pointed out by my near 100 supports was my anti-vandalism work. Keep branching out and learning new tasks, but do what you do best before anything. Trusilver 23:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Well, there's absolutely nothing wrong with vandal-fighting. Without the editors and bots who clean up after the vandals, the encyclopedia would collapse into complete junk in no time. My advice: do what you enjoy doing. If vandal-fighting's your thing, just keep on trucking with that. You probably won't be able to gain adminship without at least some article work, but there are plenty of respected non-admins on this site who are doing what they love. If you do decide you want to branch out into content creation, my advice would be to pick an area that interests you, and see what's not in the encyclopedia, but should be. For example, pop songs are an interest of mine, so I visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/List of notable songs to see what notable songs don't have articles yet, and if I like the song, I dig up some sources and create an article. Ditto with video games... lots of red links still in List of Atari 2600 games, for example. 28bytes (talk) 23:10, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yay! Someone who calls me by my name! WikiLove to you... anyway, article-building has never been my thing and anything I add would highly likely get reverted anyway. Anti-vandalism has always been what I've wanted to do on the 'pedia and hence why I started there. If you can suggest anything for me to get involved in with relation to this, then please do! Thanks for your kind words - Rich(MTCD)T|C|E-Mail 22:55, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Rich, thanks for all the work you do on Wikipedia; your efforts are hugely appreciated. I would encourage you to ignore the suggestions here and at the RFA to do X and Y in order to put together a better RfA application in the future. Instead, I would encourage you to do whatever you find interesting and compelling. There are many different things that need to be done around here, and different people like doing different things, so I don't think there is any need for you to feel pressured to do things you don't want to do. It might be fun to try content work or AfDs or whatever, but do it because you want to, not because someone told you you need to do it to pass RfA. One huge roadblock for your RfA was that your edit count is really low; once you have 2/3x (maybe more?) as many edits, if you then find that the lack of block/delete/protect buttons are really getting in the way of what you want to be helping with, then file another RfA; otherwise don't bother. While the sentiment that significant content work is required to become an admin is still alive and well, I think it may be fading. I have one request, though, as you do your great anti-vandal work. When you revert a good faith edit that is not vandalism—not a "test" as you charitably call it—like this one please provide a meaningful edit summary and avoid putting insulting messages on the user's talk page (see wp:NOTVAND if you haven't). This editor was here to help, and got mistreated by you and another established editor, and then left. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 00:30, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 July 2011
- News and notes: Picture of the Year 2010; data challenge; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Star-Spangled WikiProject
- Featured content: Two newly promoted portals
- Arbitration report: Arb resigns while mailing list leaks continue; Motion re: admin
The Signpost: 11 July 2011
- From the editor: Stepping down
- Higher education summit: Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit recap
- In the news: Britannica and Wikipedia compared; Putin award criticized; possible journalistic sockpuppeting
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Albums
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tree shaping case comes to a close
- Technology report: WMF works on its release strategy; secure server problems
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now see a list of pages with errors in code coloring. [1]
Problems
- There was a problem with editing on Thursday. Some tools like bots and VisualEditor were broken on all wikis for 10 minutes. [2]
- There was a problem with images on Thursday. They were broken on all wikis for 15 minutes. [3]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from July 14. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from July 15. It will be on all Wikipedias from July 16 (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join a technical meeting at Wikimania in Mexico City this week. [4]
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 July 2015
- Op-ed: On paid editing and advocacy: when the Bright Line fails to shine, and what we can do about it
- Traffic report: Belles of the ball
- WikiProject report: What happens when a country is no longer a country?
- News and notes: The Wikimedia Conference and Wikimania
- Featured content: When angels and daemons interrupt the vicious and intemperate
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from July 21. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from July 22. It will be on all Wikipedias from July 23 (calendar).
- You now see more warnings in the image viewer. They tell you to be careful when using the image, for example if it shows a person. [5]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on July 21 at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Future changes
- Soon you won't be able to use MathJax to display math. [6]
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
03:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 July 2015
- From the editor: Change the world
- News and notes: Wikimanía 2016; Lightbreather ArbCom case
- Wikimanía report: Wikimanía 2015 report, part 1, the plenaries
- Traffic report: The Nerds, They Are A-Changin'
- WikiProject report: Some more politics
- Featured content: The sleep of reason produces monsters
- Gallery: "One small step..."
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can now use redirects to link to JavaScript pages. [7]
- You cannot use the compact user bar any more. [8]
- You can change your options to see bigger images. [9]
- You can watch short videos about how to use VisualEditor. [10]
- You can now edit pages linked in "what links here" more easily. [11]
Problems
- There was a problem with some Lua modules on July 22 and 23. Some pages using them did not list them in "what links here". You can fix those pages with a null edit: edit and save the page without making any change.
- There was a problem with the abuse filter page on big wikis on July 23. It was due to a code error. [12]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from July 28. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from July 29. It will be on all Wikipedias from July 30 (calendar).
- JavaScript authors: You cannot use
wgNoticeUserDatato get edit counts anymore. [13]
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on July 28 at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:05, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:35, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 July 2015
- News and notes: BARC de-adminship proposal; Wikimania recordings debate
- Recent research: Wikipedia and collective intelligence; how Wikipedia is tweeted
- In the media: Is Wikipedia a battleground in the culture wars?
- Featured content: Even mammoths get the Blues
- Traffic report: Namaste again, Reddit
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The ContentTranslation extension has been updated:
- The error page you see when the sites are not working is now simpler and easier to read. It also shows the Wikimedia logo. [19]
- MediaWiki now supports redirects for CSS pages. [20]
- Bots can't guess captchas unlimited times anymore. [21]
Problems
- There was a problem with thumbnails on wikis with local images on July 24 and 25. It was due to a code error. [22]
- We can't search by file type on Wikimedia wikis now. [23]
Changes this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from August 4. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from August 5. It will be on all Wikipedias from August 6 (calendar).
Meetings
- You can join the next meeting with the VisualEditor team. During the meeting, you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The meeting will be on August 4 at 19:00 (UTC). See how to join.
Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:51, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 August 2015
- Op-ed: Je ne suis pas Google
- News and notes: VisualEditor, endowment, science, and news in brief
- WikiProject report: Meet the boilerplate makers
- Traffic report: Mrityorma amritam gamaya...
- Featured content: Maya, Michigan, Medici, Médée, and Moul n'ga