User talk:RichardEvanSchwartz
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:RichardEvanSchwartz. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
Original barnstar
[edit]![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for your Pentagram map article! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC) |
What does this mean in the real world?
[edit]The esoteric discussion of theory seems to all be there in the Pentagram map. I note that some of the links make reference to NASA. Does it have applications? I don't mean to show my ignorance, but I am not part of the select group of scholars for whom this has meaning. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:43, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
In a related problem my search indicated that there were only four articles that linked to Pentagram map. So it may not literally be an orphan, but it i obscure and hidden. If there are more articles that we can link in with, it would be good. Ideally, these should be in link links, not just "see also"s. While it is a great stand alone article, ideally it would be better if it was more integrated into the rest of the encyclopedia -- IMHO.
Pentagram map In mathematics , the pentagram map is a discrete dynamical system on the moduli space of polygons in the projective plane . ... 25 KB (4,034 words) - 14:09, 27 June 2011 Richard Schwartz his work in geometric iterations involving convex polygons and is credited for developing the concept which he has termed the pentagram map . ... 17 KB (2,465 words) - 03:25, 28 June 2011 Pentagram A pentagram (sometimes known as a pentalpha or pentangle or, more formally, as ... See also : Pentagram map (related concept) Notes ... 34 KB (4,663 words) - 02:15, 28 June 2011 Pentagon A pentagram is an example of a self-intersecting pentagon. Regular pentagons: In a regular pentagon, all ... See also : Pentagram map Golden ratio ... 16 KB (2,350 words) - 13:23, 26 June 2011 Poisson bracket called "canonical transformations", which maps canonical coordinate systems into canonical coordinate systems ... See also : Pentagram map References ... 12 KB (1,667 words) - 15:37, 14 June 2011
I know that this elite group of scholars is very small, and they all are writing about it over and over.
However, I am thinking about the occasional reader who might chance upon this article. I assume that this is a matter of some import, at least for the beauty and symmetry of the proofs. See also Help:Drawing attention to new pages. I know I'm being a pain, and I apologize. But I think you (as the primary author) could benefit from a view by someone less intimately involved in your subject matter. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:45, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for your very interesting and informative answer. That might be food for thought on expanding parts of the article. I think that your article is a vast improvement over the past iteration. It is really wonderful to engage a scholar of your reputation to add to Wikipedia. This was a tangible contribution, the qualitative shift deserves recognition.
- I've been adding links to your references in the hope that this could be a hub for those who wanted to really learn something about the subject.
- I've worn out my worth here, so you are on your own. Best regards and happy editing. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 02:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Our discussions might be worth putting on the talk page of the article. I have not taken the liberty of doing that, as I note that you have historically deleted the matters on your talk page (which is your privilege, it's your space). You might want to consider archiving the talk page discussions, rather than deleting them.
- Nevertheless, my questions and your observations would be a fitting addition to the talk page of the article. The talk page of articles is frequently the most interesting part of an article, and can be very useful to well-attuned readers. I leave that decision in your hands. Au revoir. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 02:59, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Archive
[edit]I set this up on a very basic level. If you go to the User talk:Thehelpfulone, his talk page even has an index. If you go to User talk:Charles Edward his talk page has dates placed on each archive. I am sure there are more ways to do this, as there is more than one way to skin a cat. Hope this helps. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo can explain how to change the parameters. Singularity42 (talk) 16:26, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, guys RichardEvanSchwartz (talk) 17:24, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
![Notice](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The file File:Penta oct.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 December 2019 (UTC)