User talk:Rickymonitor

Your editing privileges have been suspended indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Alternate accounts (re a familiarity with process) are not to be used for the purpose of harassing another contributor, per your actions and username. LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:43, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rickymonitor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a legitimate alternate account. I'm on a public computer and don't want my main account information to be hijacked. I've already informed an admin via email of my legitimate account.

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, it is not a legitimate alternate account. Per this page, "Such [alternate] accounts should be publicly connected to the main account." You'll need to publicly identify your main account and desist from stalking other editors. TN X Man 00:23, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rickymonitor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"Should be" publicly identified doesn't mean have to be. I've already informed one admin, who else would like to know?

Decline reason:

Your sole reason for being here is to harass an individual editor. Sorry, not happening. Blueboy 96 02:29, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppet alert

This is apparently yet another incarnation of User:Biaswarrior. See, for example, User:Rickywatcher and User:Ricky28618. Full details here: WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Biaswarrior/Archive. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:10, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]