User talk:Ricnun

Shuttle Buran program

Hello. Thanks for your edits over at Shuttle Buran program and associated pages. Would you be able to provide references for the material you've added, please, so that it is verifiable? Thanks. Mike Peel 21:17, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shure, just didn't had the time. All the references are those present on the main Buran program page, and I'll try to sort it out. A major source is [1], but most of the data is on the Russian version, and I had to use a web translator... --Ricnun 22:38, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

55 Cancri, Upsilon Andromedae images

Hey, thanks for putting those artworks into the articles, it's great to see people putting that kind of effort in. I'll just point out that the atmospheric circulation patterns on hot-Jupiters would look very different to those on outer system gas giants: here's the result of a simulation of HD 209458 b: [2]. In addition, there's been some work done on modelling extrasolar planet atmospheres [3]. For Upsilon Andromedae, the inner planet is predicted to have silicate clouds (the simulated spectrum corresponds to a bluish-green colour), the middle one is predicted to be cloudless (bluish colour) and the outer one is predicted to have water clouds (bright white clouds). For 55 Cancri, the inner gas giant is predicted to have large amounts of alkali metal absorption in the atmosphere (giving a very deep blue colour), the middle one I'd guess is a cloudless one like Upsilon Andromedae c (though this is not modelled in the paper), and the outer one is predicted to have water clouds. It might be a good idea to try and represent this in the art. Chaos syndrome 18:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I had those images on my personal page and just uploaded them here. Yes, I know about planet apearance, but I hope that in representing all the planets the same way, just changing size and distance from the star, I'll avoid speculation. Specially on a global system overview image. I'll try to do what you sugest for individual planets. I have celestia and can create the apropriate textures and use them there. But there's the question of actual planet size... I would be interesting to make images using a common scale, and compare all planets. For now I just have Celestia's information, and I don't know if it would be a good data souce for an Encyclopedia. I'll thing about this and contribute in the best way possible. Perhaps some generic "planet globes" for each planet category/apearance that we could put on infoboxes would be nice.Ricnun 12:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- While I see your point about speculation, there's also the problem that representing a Jupiter-like circulation on a hot Jupiter is definitely incorrect. I've seen several studies of the meteorology on hot Jupiters and they all come out with a pattern like the one I linked. In any case, provided the reasons for depicting a planet in a certain way are referenced to scientific papers (e.g. if we are going to use the five-class system for giant planets, make sure it's a case dealt with in that paper) or other such reliable sources, and it is made clear that these are artistic depictions based on those papers rather than actual images, I'd think that would be perfectly acceptable. As for planet radii, the transitsearch.org website has calculations based on a theoretical model (linked to from that site) which seems to reproduce Jupiter and most of the observed transiting planets quite well. Chaos syndrome 19:47, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pioneer 11 Images

Hi I tried to upload to the Commons the images that you've posted from the Pioneer 11 mission, so that I can use them for the Bulgarian wikipedia. I copied all of your description, but someone there tagged them for erasing because they didn't have all of the information. Do you know where you got them from? These guys at the Commons seem to be really obtuse... the images as so obviously from NASA, but they are still giving me a hard time. Cheers Georgipetrov 15:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I processed the images from Nasa images avaliable on the Net. I really can't help much more... If the images are not PD Nasa I really don't know. Here: [4] there's no info. for my part, I'm glad they are usefully to you, go ahead and use them!

Mars 2 & 3

Since the technical specifications take up the majority of these articles and are identical for these two spacecraft, I would like to combine the articles into a single Mars 2 and 3. I saw that you were the editor who originally split them out of the Mars probe program article and thought that I would ask your opinion. Eluchil404 13:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I split the spacecrafts into 2 articles because one was a total failure and the other did provide some results. Also, having 2 infoboxes and a separate set of launch dates and results on the same page is strange in my opinion. The best is to discuss all the Mars probes globally on the Mars probe program article and then to keep each spacecraft separate. I do agree that the technicall aspects are the same for both probes and perhaps those could be moved in the Mars probe program article to a appropriate section 89.152.13.13 18:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements in ZX Sinclair palette in the List of palettes article

I have made some improvements int that section of the article. It coincides in time with yours, so I hope we do not start a "war of editions". I have respected the images you put.

Yours,

Ricardo Cancho Niemietz, a non-accounted user.213.96.157.218 12:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, your contributions expand the section and are very nice. Perhaps you should also put them in the ZX Spectrum graphic modes article, that is much more technical and Spectrum only. Ricnun 12:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moonbase Alpha template

By looking at the Moonbase Alpha entry, I see that it looks like you might have created the template, if so, can you tell me how to edit it as I would like to add a couple of sections to it. Thanks. Douglasnicol 00:13, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No matter, I managed it. Where are you getting the birth dates for the Space:1999 characters? I've made a start on Koenigs, its a bit of a mess right now, but there's an infobox. Douglasnicol 17:28, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The dates and other character info comes from here: [5] Ricnun 19:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm starting to add to some of the Moonbase Alpha entries. I've started one on Nuclear Disposal Area 1 and illustrated it. Hopefully this appears decent enough. I'll add references if you like. Douglasnicol 15:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for your excellent contributions to Space suit. Keep up the good work! — Swpb ^{talk contribs} 13:02, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		Awarded to Ricnun for his fine work on categorizing Space:1999 articles into a good, tidy and workable format. Douglasnicol 17:57, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 8 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Atmosphere of Mercury, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

---- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 02:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SELENE‎

The SELENE article received heavy editing today by new/unregistered users, which I noticed at WikiRage.com. The article may benefit from a good review. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 16:33, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For your help in improving the Jupiter footer. Feel free to take a look at the footers I've made for Mercury, Venus and Mars as well and help make them better. I intend to make one for all of the planets in the solar system. Remember 19:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Testcard c.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Testcard c.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 03:32, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Testcard F.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Testcard F.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 03:35, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Test Card G.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Test Card G.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:30, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zond 3 discoveries

Hi Ricnun, I saw your neat Zond 3 gallery on the Zond 3 article, and that on your and mentallandscape.com and other websites, frame 25 of the Zond 3 program is missing. Through countless hours of studying the images up close, I have found that frame 25 does appear on some controversial sites about ancient astronauts, and in very reliable early space age astronomy books which contain the unedited original photograph. Mentallandscape.com does have the airbrused version of frame 28, and is missing frame 25 like your gallery and others. Again, I studied all 29 frames, and picture in the last link does not match any of the frames, so we have only one choice, and that it is the missing frame 25. Hope this helps complete your gallery, comment on my page. Thank you for your time.--Eirione (talk) 07:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Viking and Voyager (non-)use of RCA CDP1802 microprocessors

On 25 March 2007, you added text to the Viking program and Voyager program articles stating that these spacecraft used RCA CDP1802 microprocessors. While the later Galileo spacecraft did use the CDP1802, I have not found any authoritative source that can confirm that the Viking and Voyager used microprocessors of any kind. The Viking computers were under development at least three years before RCA had first silicon of the CDP1801. The primary references I've found regarding Viking and Voyager give technical descriptions of their computers that differ in nearly every respect from anything that could be built with a CDP1802. For instance, the word lengths are 18 and 24 bits, and they operate in a bit-serial fashion rather than on parallel words or bytes. I would be very interested in any authoritative sources that state that the CDP1802 was used in these spacecraft. --Brouhaha (talk) 07:55, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Pioneer34.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Pioneer34.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:54, 9 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:54, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Muara.png

Thank you for uploading File:Muara.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:55, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Quarteto 1111

The article Quarteto 1111 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article about a non-notable band.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fages (talk) 22:56, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:P10A28.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:P10A28.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 08:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:P10A51.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:P10A51.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 19:49, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Apollo11tv.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Apollo11tv.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 22:54, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Apollo12tv.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Apollo12tv.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 22:56, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Apollo11tv.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Apollo11tv.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 22:27, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mars expedition

Category:Mars expedition, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 19:46, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Space:1999 character

Template:Infobox Space:1999 character has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:47, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Stereo Quadraphonic (logo).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Stereo Quadraphonic (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:49, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Chart of Soyuz spacecraft models.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:31, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed renaming of lunar expedition program categories

Please see my proposal to speedily rename several categories including: Hugo999 (talk) 10:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Testcard J.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Testcard J.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vida (Sons do Quotidiano)

The article Vida (Sons do Quotidiano) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. A 2 track EP. That info isn't even available on here. I looked it up.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jennica✿ / ^talk 17:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Venuscolors.jpg

The file File:Venuscolors.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned, seems spammy

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. B (talk) 16:11, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Salyut-6.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Salyut-6.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Space:1999 character

Template:Infobox Space:1999 character has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox character. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 22:55, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AFD:

I sent several pages you made to AFD:

Harizotoh9 (talk) 23:56, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Parrot 64x96.png

The file File:Parrot 64x96.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

File:Parrot zx palette.png

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Highcolor256x192.gif

The file File:Highcolor256x192.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:S256x192col.gif

The file File:S256x192col.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Mariner 10's second encounter with Mercury (diagram).jpg

The file File:Mariner 10's second encounter with Mercury (diagram).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]