User talk:Rightventracleleft

This is Rightventracleleft's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Summit Equipment & Supplies Superfund Site (May 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Summit Equipment & Supplies Superfund Site and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Summit Equipment & Supplies Superfund Site, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 10:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rightventracleleft! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 10:34, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest with Matthew Berdyck?[edit]

Hi

I see you reverted my reversion of your edit at Warren County, Virginia. This is considered bad form, and we should take it up on the articles talk page. However I see that you did the same thing at List of people from Akron, Ohio, so I thought I would take it to your talk page.

Are you in any way related to or involved with Matthew Berdyck? I ask this because as far as I can tell all your edits relate to him in some way. If so, then you have a conflict of interest (COI), and you should know that "COI editing is strongly discouraged on Wikipedia" and "If COI editing causes disruption, an administrator may opt to place blocks on the involved accounts."

Since all of your edits have been reverted for lacking notability or sources, and you keep making them without changing anything, I would say you are verging into disruptive territory. Please find good sources or a good ground for notability before making any more edits. If you make more edits in the same vein as your previous ones, I will unfortunately try to get an admin involved with a view to stop you from making these kind of unsourced, non-notable edits that damage Wikipedia.

I hope we can resolve this amicably, and I would genuinely like it if you found good backing for your edits, or if you in another way started making valuable contributions to the project.

Respectfully, Knuthove (talk) 10:00, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. I am not Matthew Berdyck. I am noting that you are removing sourced information. Are you a political opponent of Matthew Berdyck? All of your edits appear to be to remove any mention of him even when it's third-party sourced by ABC News and other media outlets. Your removal of this sourced information is vandalism and I'd like you to stop. All of my edits have been appropriately sourced. If you do not stop you will be reported for vandalism. Example, Matthew Berdyck grew up in Akron, ABC News "Akron Residents Have Concerns About Superfund Site Security", August 2014. Yet you claim it's not sourced?

I created the Summit Equipment & Supplies article expecting to improve upon it. There are dozens of news article about the subject. I truly believe you are being paid to suppress any mention of this man on Wikipedia. You claim there is no sourcing but there is plenty of sourcing. Rightventracleleft (talk) 18:24, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of incidents noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Personal attacks, edit warring, and a possible conflict of interest by User:Rightventracleleft. Knuthove (talk) 20:09, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. El_C 22:45, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This incorrect. In fact, of all of the people mentioned, Beryck is one of the only ones who has a citation and third party sourcing. Please stop personally attacking me or you will be reported.

This is a default template ({{uw-nn}}), not anything personal, lest of all an attack. That article does not exist. If you continue to behave disruptively, you may be sanctioned. El_C 03:13, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are obviuosly coming into a situation where you do not know the history. Mr. Berdyck has a self-admitted, self-branded paid troll group attacking his envirponmental activism work. This user who is raising quesations is clearly one of these paid trolls as it directly referenced the paid troll group in it's other posts, as evidence. I will coninue to revert these articles and add information that is sourced and is being removed by a paid troll. You are the vandals and you ar attempting to skew Wikipedia for your reasons.

That seems highly unlikely. In any case, I have blocked you from editing indefinitely. You may appeal the block, but the chances that the reasons you cite above will result in a successful unblock, in my view, approaches zero. El_C 03:25, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That something is "highly unlikely" isn't an indicator for whether it's happening or not. A person can be struck by lighting, which is "highly unlikely" but it doesn't mean it didn't happen. I had added only sourced information to these pages. I am not Matthew Berdyck and I hope he uses legal tacitics to identify you and sue you for defamation for suggesting I am. He's known for his ability to use the courts to identify and legally isolate anonymous trolls. Rightventracleleft (talk) 04:12, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Rightventracleleft. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. El_C 22:48, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if you can't read English but I have very clearly stated I am not Matthew Berdyck and have no association with him. He's a famous guy. Obviously. He's got supporters.

If you continue to promote that individual again, you will be sanctioned. There will be no further warnings. El_C 03:15, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not promoting Matthew Berdyck by adding third party sourced information to Wikipedia. You are wrong. Rightventracleleft (talk) 04:13, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 03:23, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rightventracleleft (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Adding legitmate third party sourced information is not disruptive editing. I am repairing vandalism to various pages by an editor who is clearly being paid to remove the name Matthew Berdyck from Wikipedia. This user even mentioned and referred people to the name of the paid troll group, in their other posts. Rightventracleleft (talk) 03:32, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have revoked talk page access due to ongoing personal attacks. ST47 (talk) 04:23, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.