Jump to content

User talk:Rigmahroll

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Rigmahroll, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Bhadani 23:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

utcursch | talk 12:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Diwali

[edit]

Hello Rigmaroll, I saw that you moved the 5 Days of Diwali section under Hinduism. I do not know myself but are you sure that Sikhs and Jains don't celebrate Diwali as a five day period. Then again, many Hindus only celebrate the main day of Diwali. Just curious, thanks GizzaChat © 01:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may be right. But the writeup as it is, is Hindu-centric. That is the reason for the move. If more content can be added to make it applicable to other religions, then it should deserve a section on its own. Rigmahroll 18:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Thanks for helping to clean up the citations on the Hinduism page. HeBhagawan 03:17, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good job reverting vandalism, keep it up.--Arjun 21:10, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Coimbatore

[edit]

Hi,

In my personal opinion I thought it looks more orderly in the present format. I think the earlier version had many bold sub-headings. But thats my personal opinion you are welcome to change the format.

Jisha C J 17:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Sections_and_headings suggests adding sub-headings to make it easier for a reader to navigate. I will go ahead and adjust them. Thanks for your response. ɤіɡʍаɦɤʘʟʟ 17:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was looking at this page Chennai for reference. Also, when the contents under a subheading are less than two sentences then the sub heading might look bigger than the contents. So I thought of cutting out some sub headings. Thats all. Jisha C J 17:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, me too. :) But most of the sections in Chennai have separate main articles. That may not be possible for Coimbatore. We can to that to Coimbatore if we edit the text to make it compact enough and remove some/all of the sub-sections. Do you have any suggestions on this? ɤіɡʍаɦɤʘʟʟ 17:43, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe it is possible, but only if its backed by strong reference materials. The main articles for culture and history must be possible. Removing all subsections isnt possible, but some of them can be removed. Jisha C J
Then lets shoot for it section by section. ɤіɡʍаɦɤʘʟʟ 17:57, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good work on the forestry part of the page. I had doubts about reported sightings of Leopard :). Do you in any case have some/any pics of the city much needed for the page? I had removed a image uploaded by a newbie user yesterday. --Jisha (Talk) 19:37, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Not really. I added some pictures a while back from commons. Lets keep looking. ɤіɡʍаɦɤʘʟʟ 23:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tilaka

[edit]

Thanks for your improvements to the Tilaka page. It reads better now. Regards, Gouranga(UK) 21:17, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Links for Wikipedians interested in Hindu content

Welcome kit

Register

Network

Contribute content

About Hindu symbols

The Aum (shown at the top of this template) and the Swastika (from Sanskrit svástika, स्वस्तिक), shown below, are traditional symbols of Hinduism. Aum symbolizes the infinite Brahman and the entire Universe. The Swastika symbolizes growth and life, and has been a sacred symbol in Dharmic religions for 3,000 years. It is used in religious and civil ceremonies in India. The Hindu Swastika is often decorated with a dot in each quadrant, as shown here.

Currently, the Hindu WikiProject are running a survey on the use of the Hindu Swastika. If you are offended by or wish to comment on the Swastika, voice your opinions here

Links for Wikipedians interested in Hindu content

Nobleeagle [TALK] [C] 03:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Varanasi

[edit]

I'm sorry, I think I must have been editing an out of date version of the page without realizing it. My apologies. john k 03:47, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Editor's Barnstar

[edit]
The Editor's Barnstar
Awarded for excellent discretion in improving articles about the major cities of India. Keep up the great work.Nposs 18:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chennai Tamil Unicode

[edit]

Please refer to this page [[1]] which shows that in Tamil, the compound consonant-vowel with the sound e (ay), such as the Che in Chennai, has the symbol for the vowel first, then the symbol for the consonant. The same holds true for the nai letter: the Tamil symbol for the sound ai precedes the symbol for the sound n. Therefore, when you are editing the Tamil unicode script for the word Chennai, you are changing it to a misspelling. Transliterated letter-for-letter into Roman letters it would be eChnain. Look at this document [2] and you'll see that the Tamil Unicode character 0BC6 is designed to go before the consonant, not after it, and so is the character 0BC8, because that's how Tamil works. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fryguy777 (talk • contribs) 11:17, 22 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I am not disagreeing with you. Before proceeding further can you please check whether you have turned on complex character support on your computer. You can check that using this page. I have tested mine and it renders the samples properly. Let me know. ɤіɡʍаɦɤʘʟʟ 16:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I stand corrected! Sorry for all the trouble. I have now enabled complex character support on my computer and the Tamil spelling of "Chennai" now looks correct as you have it. Thanks for graciously educating me. Fryguy777 11:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof!

[edit]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Rigmahroll! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego talk 16:02, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits of TCS

[edit]

This is regarding the edits made to the TCS article on 11 April, 2007. Whatever articles we have refered, have already been mentioned in the external links. The rest of it is our original work. However if you need any other disclaimer, please let us know. We are willing to stand by it and we are also willing to provide any other references if required.

License tagging for Image:Rajni.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rajni.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: Rajinikanth article

[edit]

I haven't been able to find many citations for the article. I also doubt much of the pre 2000 content will be on the net. ~~ AVTN T CV A 21:19, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bengaluru

[edit]

i see that you have changed all references from bangalore to bengaluru in the iisc article. please observe here, that the consensus decision has been to keep it as bangalore as the name change hasnt been confirmed by the central govt. hence, please change it back in the iisc article and wherever else you made it bengaluru. yours Tommy Stardust 14:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will gladly change it back if you can point me to a reference that shows that it needs to be confirmed by the Central Govt. I could find anything quickly on google. The reference given on Bangalore article was dead. I have replaced that with a ref request.
sorry i wasn't clear but i meant to point to vote on the bangalore talk page, and the fact that the bangalore article is still "bangalore" and not "bengaluru". based on that itself, for the sake of consistency, i think u should revert it.Tommy Stardust 08:30, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking opinion from regular editors on reference pattern

[edit]

References: Notes and citations section; change in reference and notes temporarily ceased; WP:FOOT says I am not doing wrong; Separate Notes and Citation sections

Opinion is sought from regular editors of the article Hinduism regarding the splitting of Notes and references section. This is a short gist of the discussions going on in the above mentioned talk links: Having a separate "Notes" (for explanatory remarks) and "Citations" (for direct citations), although permitted, is relatively rare in Wikipedia, and also in academic journals. The main rationale behind doing this is to distinguish a series of explanatory remarks from the series of citations (please see Rabindranath Tagore, Demosthenes for examples).

This sandbox gives a glimpse of how the article would look if we split the sections (the sandbox is under work, so may not be perfect). This link shows how the article looks with combined section. This may give an idea how it looked when I started working on references. I converted many references to Harvard format, apart from splitting the sections.

Opinion for regular editors are sought regarding the application of splitting of two section for this article. Please do so in Talk:Hinduism in the section Talk:Hinduism#Seeking_opinion_from_regular_editors_on_reference_pattern. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 04:59, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chennai

[edit]

Chennai has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ipindia.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ipindia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Titan logo.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Titan logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:Actel logo color sm.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Actel logo color sm.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:57, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Covansys logo.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

[edit]

Your upload of File:About rigmahroll.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:23, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Rigmahroll. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rigmahroll&oldid=1146352851"