User talk:Rikit9823

June 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm S0091. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Multi-attribute auction have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 18:39, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiktok India (June 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tiktok India and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tiktok India, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:48, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rikit9823! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:48, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Bani – Ishq Da Kalma. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 19:48, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use a wiki as a source[edit]

Hi Rikit9823, please do not use any wiki, including Wikipedia as a source for content. Wikis are user generated so are not reliable. Please see user generated sources and using Wikipedia as a source for more in depth information about why these are not acceptable sources. Continuing add these sources is considered disruptive. If you have questions, you can reach out to the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 22:08, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. MrOllie (talk) 20:42, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rikit9823, you have previously been apprised not to use wikis or other user-generated sites as references. Here you seem to still be doing this. Stop. See WP:UGC, and stick to our reliable sourcing guidelines. If you want to see a general list of good and bad sites, see WP:ICTFSOURCES. Continued submission of poor references will result in your editing privileges being pulled. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:54, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 20:04, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rikit9823 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry for making spamming links and using wikipedia as a source, actualy I was not aware about the terms and conditons of Wikipedia. So I'm really sorry and I apologise for whatever I did.I request you to please unblock my account. Rikit9823 (talk) 19:40, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You state that you apologize for "whatever I did"; you will need to tell us what you did wrong, so that we can be assured the problematic behavior will not repeat, and describe what it is you will edit about if unblocked. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 21:33, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:Tiktok in India[edit]

Hello, Rikit9823. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tiktok in India, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 21:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tiktok in India[edit]

Hello, Rikit9823. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tiktok in India".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]