User talk:Risean 12345

Hello, Risean 12345, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:36, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Shakespear (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at William Shakespeare instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Risean 12345/sandbox/William Shakespear and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Risean 12345/sandbox/William Shakespear, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:08, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Risean 12345! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:08, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Shakespear (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at William Shakespeare instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Risean 12345/sandbox/William Shakespear and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Risean 12345/sandbox/William Shakespear, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 11:05, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Shakespear (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at William Shakespeare instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Risean 12345/sandbox/William Shakespear and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Risean 12345/sandbox/William Shakespear, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:43, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Risean 12345/sandbox, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account. Certainly we can't accept material copied from a source which has a copyright notice saying "all rights reserved", as in the case of the text you copied. JBW (talk) 09:10, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for User:Risean 12345/sandbox/William Shakespear. JBW (talk) 09:18, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SSA22 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, SSA22, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 05:13, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of All the plants

The article All the plants has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

We already have plant. This article doesn't serve any purpose here and WP:TNT applies. Not a worthwhile redirect either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:20, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of All the plants

This message originally was about a proposed deletion. Since the article was deprodded, I reverted myself. Apologies for the duplicate notification. Urve (talk) 08:49, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about All the plants

Hello, Risean 12345, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Urve, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, All the plants, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All the plants .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Urve}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Urve (talk) 08:51, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the page as a copyright infringement since you appear to have copy and pasted the entire text without providing appropriate attribution. Furthermore, I have no idea whatsoever what you were trying to achieve with that page, and would appreciate an explanation. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 18:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Henize 70

Hi, I just noticed that an article you recently created, Henize 70, currently doesn't have any cite any sources. Wikipedia requires citations to reliable sources, in order for other editors to be able to verify the content of an article. You can read more about adding citation here. -- Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 16:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Spica Star

Hello, Risean 12345

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Spica Star for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hasan (talk) 07:09, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Rigel star

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Rigel star. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Rigel. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Rigel. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:52, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:53, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List_of_Stars

The article List_of_Stars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article already exists. If you'd like to contest your article's deletion, go to the talk page on the article. I'd recommend you read these. Article deletion help: More info on article deletion: Help on article creation, so this happens less often:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.== June 2021 == Decentname (talk)

Deletion discussion about All the Stars in the Universe

Hello, Risean 12345, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Whiteguru, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, All the Stars in the Universe, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All the Stars in the Universe.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whiteguru (talk) 07:37, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with All the Stars in the Universe. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:25, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 16:27, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Kinds of Plants. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 21:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

what

i will not Remove all the Stars in the Universe

Hello and Welcome!

Hello, Risean12345. My name is RomanSpa, and I wanted to say hello so you know me personally, and not just as someone participating in debates. I've been a Wikipedia editor for several years, and know that it can be a bit confusing to get started in creating and editing articles. I can see that you've created a couple of new articles recently that are being considered for deletion, and I just want you to know that this isn't a bad thing, and isn't directed at you personally. All that's happening is that we're trying to make sure that Wikipedia works well for everyone, so we're preventing existing encyclopedic content from being duplicated. In your case, you created All the Stars in the Universe, but the information you would need for this page is already covered in Lists of stars and its sub-lists. It's great that you want to work on this area, but rather than work on it on your own, the Wikipedia way is for us to work collaboratively. A good place to start would be to start checking the data that other people have assembled on Lists of stars and its related pages. Then you can gradually add extra new information as you find it.

I should also say that Wikipedia really needs editors who are interested in astronomy. If you're interested in this, please check out our Astronomy Portal. Also, as a new editor you may find it useful to take a look at our Teahouse - this is a great place for people who are just starting out in Wikipedia, and the regulars there are friendly and helpful. Have a great day, and I hope you continue to contribute to Wikipedia whenever you can! RomanSpa (talk) 14:11, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of largest nebula

The article List of largest nebula has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Arbitrary list with no defined criteria or referencing to support claims.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 16:24, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of largest nebula for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of largest nebula is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of largest nebula until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 17:58, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 03:23, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of largest nebula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page M27. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]