User talk:RishabhFOREVER

Speedy deletion nomination of Kheda dabar[edit]

Hello RishabhFOREVER,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kheda dabar for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ~Mohammad Hossain~ 11:49, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RishabhFOREVER, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi RishabhFOREVER! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:12, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ahirwati has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ahirwati was changed by RishabhFOREVER (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927524 on 2014-10-12T09:41:57+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:42, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Yadav, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 10:37, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Yadav shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 10:41, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot keep replacing well-sourced content with your own preferred caste history. The points that you have been deleting are well-documented both in the sources and on the article talk page. - Sitush (talk) 10:42, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Dougweller (talk) 10:53, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Aphariyas without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Don't remove the sourced contents from the article. Issues, if any, be addressed on the Talk Page. SMahenS (Talk) 15:31, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]