User talk:Ritio123

Welcome!

Hello, Ritio123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Yeh Hai Aashiqui. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! BIK89 (talk) 00:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan Elmi Domani

Hello Ritio123. Bryan Elmi Domani was determined to require merging and redirection due to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Elmi Domani. If you believe that there is significant change in evidence of his notability since this version, please see WP:DRV, but do not continue to restore without consensus. Also, it looks like you might be using a machine translation tool such as Google Translate. This does not translate cleanly into English (try using it to translate an English page into Indonesian...). The version listed above is a better translation. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 02:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ritio123, If you keep on restoring the article, you're likely to run into WP:3RR, which can result in blocks. Please see my previous comment. ^~Hydronium^~Hydroxide^~(Talk)~ 06:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 06:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 13:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:43, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]