User talk:Riverlogsoftware

This is Riverlogsoftware's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Riverlogsoftware/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Riverlogsoftware (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

talk4kids (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Fine. I appreciate your inputs on my English style. I will see what needs to be done to correct it. But it is not clear to me from @MathewVanitas , if I can request a change to the ID and provide talk4kids so that I can continue submitting what I think should be useful for people in general. Your inputs or any reviewers inputs can be helpful. Once again, thank you for taking time to review. It is a noble task. Thank you

Decline reason:

Either you don't possess the English comprehension skills to understand what you've been told numerous times, or you have a case of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. Either way, you are done wasting our time here. Talk page access revoked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:59, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Riverlogsoftware (talk) 02:13, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 09:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Riverlogsoftware, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 09:26, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Think Big (March 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

The comment they left was:

This still reads like an advertisement, and has no references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Think Big and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:48, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Think Big[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Think Big, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:05, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, there have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:21, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Riverlogsoftware (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

talk4kids (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I like to contribute to the children and to the community I live in. World is small, let me make small contributions to upbring a peaceful, 'thoughtful' society. Let me part of a great society that reduces arrogance and nepotism and help in creating the importance of making children understand the power of knowledge, education and peaceful communion.

Decline reason:

Based on your response here, I don't think you have the English skills necessary to contribute to this project with competence. you need to address the reasons for your original block, as well. only (talk) 21:14, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

19:24, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Riverlogsoftware (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

talk4kids (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Another reviewer has asked for the reason why the original id was blocked. It is also interesting to note

that such a big syndicate such as the "Wikipedia.org" gives statements such as "I don't think you have the English skills necessary to contribute to this project with competence." . Just with the two sentence, one has decided that I have no English skills necessary ... with competence. While that sentence itself needs to be reviewed, I like to present the original reason for block. It was because of the reason that the userid and company name had similarities and it was being told by the reviewer as having the nature of advertisement. Please let me know what else is required to provide this new id talk4kids and re-initiate the review process of my original submission. While I am recording the screen , I earnestly ask if these conversations will be available for the future.

Decline reason:

We're not unblocking you so that you could continue posting what you posted before. And yes - your unblock requests are barely coherent so the question of your command of English still stands. Max Semenik (talk) 23:09, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Riverlogsoftware (talk) 22:13, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]