User talk:Rivusa

Welcome!

Hi Rivusa! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 10:40, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Atlantic306 (talk) 03:11, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Harshad Chopda are the same promotional copy that has been added by numerous promotional undeclared paid editors who have been blocked. If you are a paid editor you need to disclose it as per WP:PAID, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 03:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am not a paid editor or whatever that is. I researched various articles to figure out what is supposed to be added. So I added sources and updates while copying certain edits which fulfilled the info needs of the sections. How is adding sources and updating about what is new, paid editing? There are no opinions or personal appreciation or hyping up. Everything is sourced and as per rules and expansion needs of articles. Rivusa (talk) 06:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Everything is sourced and as per rules You have fewer than 50 edits to your name, so it seems unlikely that you have any actual knowledge of Wikipedia's rules. For instance, your choice of references could be improved, specifically, you shouldn't be referencing gossip rags like Pinkvilla and Bollywoodlife. You should quickly familiarise yourself with our reliable sourcing guidelines and see WP:ICTFSOURCES for a general list (i.e. one that that is not exhaustive) of sites typically considered good and bad. Also, it tends to look promotional when you add non-notable award mill fluff like the Lions Gold Award and my favourite bootleg award, the Dadasaheb Phalke Film Festival Award. See WP:DADASAHEB. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, so we are not obligated to log every promotional award the subject won, rather, we should only be including notable ones. See also WP:FILMCRITICLIST. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:16, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it seems you are violating our rules about sockpuppetry. So long as you are evading your original block, you are not welcome to edit at Wikipedia, and any content you submit can be reverted by any editor without regard for whether it is useful or not. WP:REVERTBAN. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Dimpletisha (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]