User talk:Rjacobs1
Ways to improve Augustine Grant
[edit]Hi, I'm Reb1981. Rjacobs1, thanks for creating Augustine Grant!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Need to add proper citations.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Reb1981 (talk) 02:03, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Augustine Grant
[edit]Hi, I'm Reb1981. Rjacobs1, thanks for creating Augustine Grant!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. There needs to be more independent sources.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Reb1981 (talk) 02:05, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Augustine Grant
[edit]Hello Rjacobs1,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Augustine Grant for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Nomination of Augustine Grant for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Augustine Grant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augustine Grant until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reb1981 (talk) 07:28, 10 May 2017 (UTC)