User talk:RoadMan13
Hello. I would be happy to answer questions about roads, but please make it in English. If the question is not in English, I will not answer it. Please also leave me your username, so I can answer the questions I am being asked faster rather than trying to search for you. Thank You
Puzzled
[edit]I'm puzzled. Why did you redirect valid users such as User:Sulfur to User:Periodic Table? These are not article, these are personal userpage. You should not be messing with them. Royalbroil 00:15, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you. By linking them together, you are implying that they are all the same person. The same thing when you redirected User:Z to yourself, you are saying that you are the same person. I think they all should be undone. If you only created them from blank pages, then you probably should have an admin like myself delete all of them instead of blanking them. Page blanking looks messy and some users get cranky with a blank page. All you have to do is give me the word and I'll speedy delete all of them. By the way, you left your comment at the top of my talk page. So you know, comments belong at the bottom of the page. Just a little etiquette FYI. Royalbroil 01:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
- I have deleted what I can, and reverted all of the rest. They had history before your edit. It's the best that I can do. Royalbroil 02:41, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Blocked as a sock puppet
[edit]You may contest this block by adding the text
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.RoadMan13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I did not have control of that userpage. I was helping my friend create his webpage.
Decline reason:
If you are unable to maintain control of your account you should not be editing Wikipedia. I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:07, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The article State Route 3002 (Beaver County, Pennsylvania) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No assertion of notability; quadrant routes are not inherently notable.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – TMF 07:50, 25 July 2010 (UTC)