User talk:Roastytoast/Archive 1

Random Messages[edit]

Sup, and nice bout what? that's ok, i got the code my self.Rise Against713 21:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC) Rise Against713 22:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

just getting startedRise Against713 22:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC) i have other things to do, sorry got to goRise Against713 21:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found an error on the OHS article (yea there is one) it said that dennis hastard was the current speaker of the house (of course i fixed that) Rise Against713 23:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great ROASTY TOAST 22:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

manga[edit]

you read manga right to leftRise Against713 21:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yea I know ROASTY TOAST 21:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

wikiholic[edit]

dude i took the wikiholic test, Check my score on my user pageRise Against713 01:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

slightly lower than my first one but still impressive none the less ROASTY TOAST 01:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yea sorry about the signature thing (just frogot) any way i took the wikiholic test again. i got a much better score this time Rise Against713 23:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

I was tagged with a vandalism warning concerning the article on teenage pregnancy by this user "Roasty Toast". I have read the wiki page on Vandalism on my edits didn't seem to fall into the mentioned categories. I did read that when a vandalism warning is given that a reason is also supposed to be given. Large amounts of my contribution to the article were deleted. As for as I know according to Wiki policy deleting edits unless they are falsifiable is considered vandalism. If information falls into a gray category editors are supposed to ask for citations. âThe preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.168.239.61 (talk) 03:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

This is what I reverted "Stopping adult men from preying on young girls." which is really a nonsense edit. And any edit that isn't constructive is considered vandalism. Feel free to discuss this matter with me. ROASTY TOAST 15:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was also tagged with vandalsim for a change to the rabbit breeds section. I removed "Conner is very good looking too." from the American Fuzzy Lop section because it makes absolutely no sense in the context of that article. I have no idea what "Conner" is in the context of American Fuzzy lops (nor why such a useless subjective statement is in there). I thought I was helping to clean up the article, but this was reported as "vandalism" and the change was reverted.

hey i forgot how to put on the anti vandal tool and for some reason i don't have it so can u help? Rise Against713 02:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ok how do i get it to show my the edits with the green and yellow box things? Rise Against713 02:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

how do you give warnings? Rise Against713 03:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Belated Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Roastytoast, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Dfrg.msc 23:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I gathered that, and I thought it was a shame that you hadn't been welcomed yet. Cheers, Dfrg.msc 23:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BARNSTAR[edit]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I Rise Against713, give you the anti-vandalism barnstar Rise Against713 18:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CHICOTW[edit]

I see your user name listed as a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago. I do not know if you are aware that we are attempting to revive the CHICOTW. See our results history. We could use additional input in nominating future articles, voting on nominees and editing winning nominees. Should you contribute you will receive weekly notices like the following:

	Chicago Collaboration of the Week
Last week you voted for the Chicago COTW. Thank you! This week Rich Melman has been chosen. Please help improve it towards the quality level of a Wikipedia featured article. See the To Do List to suggest a change or to see an open tasks list.
	Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago

TonyTheTiger 01:25, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

contents[edit]

how do you make a contents box like the ones in articles? --Barkus23 18:37, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yay[edit]

Barkus 02:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Arena Football League[edit]

hey i put my name on the members list. when will we get a box? Rise Against713 23:56, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

hey i started to put the project box on the teams talk pages (i started at Tampa Bay Storm and worked my way up) Rise Against713 02:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i put the project on all the teams (that you didn't), and AFL on ESPN. also when are whe goning to get a picture on the project banner? Rise Against713 03:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i put the banner on some of the last defunct teams Rise Against713 22:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

and all the arenas Rise Against713 22:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks For the BARNSTAR and awesome pic for the projectRise Against713 13:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I started to tag players. I taged the Rush, Crush, and Brigade players (with profiles). And yes i will keep my page like that

Fair use rationale for Image:ArenaBowl-Trophy.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:ArenaBowl-Trophy.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Arena_Football_League-Ball.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Arena_Football_League-Ball.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arena Football League-stub[edit]

Hi - I see you have recently created a new stub type. As it states at Wikipedia:Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, new stub types should be proposed prior to creation at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies.

It is far from clear that your new stub type woyuld have the 60 stubs usually required for a separate stub type, and it isdefinitely not named in accordaance with stub naming guidelines. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any reason why this stub type should not be proposed for deletion or renaming at WP:SFD. And please, in future, propose new stub types first! Grutness...wha? 01:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, it has been a while. At the very least it will need renaming to ArenaFootballLeague-stub, per the naming guidelines, which is handled through SFD, so I'll list it there. Grutness...wha? 23:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uhh...[edit]

Do you have any bots? The Phoenix Enforcer 00:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Banner[edit]

Please remove your practical joke banner. Such things are obnoxious and detract from the user experience. Also, spoofing the user interface is officially discouraged per WP:USER. For an example of a fun and far more palettable alternative, see the orange box at User talk:Bishonen. If you feel a need to keep the orange box, please consider using a distinctive message not easily confused with the new messages announcement. Dragons flight 08:36, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TEST[edit]

Hi. I don't understand the purpose of this edit. You did a lot more than remove one score. I also don't understand why you removed the score, did you think it was fake? Also, you modified many of the scorers comments, other than just numbers. Why did you do this? You changed the comments themselves, to mean something totally different from what they meant, and you also changed the timestamp. Did you simply revert? Why did you do so? Please explain your edit. Thanks. A stroHur ricane 00 1^{(Talk+Contribs+Ubx)} 14:54, 10 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

userbox[edit]

where can i get the scrubs, futrama, and the clinton boxes? Rise Against713 22:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

no but i just ~~deleted~~ reverted it for you Rise Against713 23:08, 10

that's ok, i got the code my self.Rise Against713 21:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i have other things to do, sorry got to goRise Against713 21:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i like what you did to the VooDoo user box Rise Against713 01:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ididn't know they're were zune boxes. Also aren't those lo-go copy writed ?Rise Against713 23:17, 11 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Ok[edit]

Your probably right so i will leave "Wannabe Kate" up. Simply south 10:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC) [reply]

CHICOTW[edit]

	Chicago Collaboration of the Week
Last week you voted for the Chicago COTW. Thank you! This week Beaches in Chicago has been chosen. Please help improve it towards the quality level of a Wikipedia featured article. See the To Do List to suggest a change or to see an open tasks list.
	Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago

TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 00:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not all newbies are vandals[edit]

Hi Rostytoast. I just noticed your comments here in response to edits by what appears to be a new user experimenting. This user made a quick comment and then removed it a minute later. Treating this as vandalism is likely to alienate new users who are just trying to see how it all works. A better response would have been a welcome and perhaps {{Test1}}. I appreciate the effort you put into fighting vandals, but try not to bite the newbies in the process. -- Samuel Wantman 19:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion. -- Samuel Wantman 19:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to VandalProof![edit]

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Roastytoast! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Ale_Jrb ^talk 21:26, 8 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Logos[edit]

If it's about the WNBA logo, I changed it and appologize. If it's something else, You'll need to be more specific.--NavyHighlander 01:45, 18 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Hey[edit]

Hey man, I wanted to show you a replacement for the this user likes big boom box.

This user enjoys a nice big BOOM!!!!!

User:Pupster21/Userbox Templates/Boom Ta Da! Just dropping in. --Pupster21 Talk To Me 18:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You like? --Pupster21 Talk To Me 23:20, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll work on that. --Pupster21 Talk To Me 23:25, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How about now? --Pupster21 Talk To Me 23:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. --Pupster21 Talk To Me 20:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

24.118.153.134[edit]

I see you're concerned with this annoying kid, too... we really have to petition the mods to get him banned. He's getting "Last Warnings" once or twice a month, but nothing has been done since November... Zaku^Talk 19:59, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i understand that i may have deleted some Lincoln County war information and a apologize. It was a mistake. Thank you.

yeah i deleted that line[edit]

Because it's a bogus record, one that doesn't exist. Some of the schmucks around here need to check the facts.

--65.27.34.181 11:40, 1 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Cheers...[edit]

...for reverting vandalism on my userpage, nicely spotted. - Zeibura S. Kathau ^{(Info | Talk)} 21:26, 3 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

![edit]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Roastytoast, I award you the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar in apprechiation of your excellent vandal-fighting. Keep it up! Mystytopia (talk) 00:48, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 00:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

A favour...[edit]

I was (falsely) accused of being a sock puppet. Could you please comment on this matter. The page is Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/Imbilly. Thanks! -Billy227, Review my account!! ^{talk contribs sndbx usbx} 01:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks![edit]

Roastytoast! Thanks a bunch for fixing those templates! Herostratus 07:16, 13 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Award[edit]

Hey Roastytoast,
Here is the award that you've earned for finding my secret page! User:Selfworm/HiddenLinkAward Good job! selfworm^Talk) 18:10, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it seems you've recived quite a few more awards Rosty Rise Against713 01:54, 6 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Speedy Delete[edit]

You placed a Speedy Delete tag saying "Article has no context", the appropriate tag would be "Page Blanked by only editor"

Ok, By the way, nice userpage :) -Flubeca^Talk 16:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed content[edit]

You revered an edit I was making and left a message on my talk page.

Some of the removed content was inappropriate for Wikipedia; it was either how-to information or OR. The other was being moved (as stated in the edit summary) to a more appropriate section. 171.71.37.207 20:29, 27 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

You found my secret page![edit]

		The Original Barnstar
		For finding my secret page Pupster21 Talk To Me 11:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Pupster21 Talk To Me 11:56, 7 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Questions[edit]

Hi roastytoast, my username is JoeBonnano, and i'm new to wikipedia. I just had some questions like how do you write articles, and creat user pages. I kind of understand it, but i'm not 100% sure. you seem to be pretty seasoned, and you have a good handle on thins, so i thought i should ask you. please get back to me on my talk page whenever you can, cause i would really appreciate it, also, how do i find user page on wikipedia. the only way i've been able to do it so far is by typing in the username in Google. i would relly like your help, whenever you get a chance. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoeBonnano (talk • contribs) 03:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Arenabowl1989.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Arenabowl1989.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:02, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]