Jump to content

User talk:RobNaylor452

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, RobNaylor452, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Julian Assange. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! KillerChihuahua?!? 23:27, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rob, I undid your edit to Julian Assange; first of all, you wrote it informally "Some have argued" and "This is not legally correct as the Act states..." which are a bit conversational. I'm not sure what you were trying to say or what relevance it has for the article, but I've provided a welcome message with some helpful links above, and I hope you stick around. KillerChihuahua?!? 23:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Assange

[edit]
Hi KillerChihuahua thank you for your assistance, I was trying to insert some legal clarity as what you have stated is incorrect. Firstly section 1(5) does not limit the powers under section 1(4) the material considerations are given "without prejudice". That is standard legal terminology which means 'not limiting'. I do realise where you obtained that information - there is a discussion page on a legal blog. I'm not sure why they have ignored this basic fact as the language is very common in statutes.
Secondly there is the matter of [1]
Diplomatic asylum

"A right of diplomatic asylum is not established in international law. The International Court of Justice has emphasised that in the absence of treaty or customary rules to the contrary, a decision by a mission to grant asylum involves a derogation from the sovereignty of the receiving state. The Organization of American States agreed a convention in 1954."

The current activities in the Ecuadorian Embassy are a departure from the established consular activities listed in the Vienna Convention and that is what gives the UK the right to raise the issue of the 1987 Act.
Hope this helps you further. RobNaylor452 (talk) 23:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You need to discuss that on the talk page of the article, which is located at Talk:Julian Assange. Feel free to paste what you have stated above on that page, and discuss your desired changes with the editors of that article. KillerChihuahua?!? 01:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RobNaylor452, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi RobNaylor452! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

This message automatically delivered by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]