User talk:Rob at Arcadia Contemporary

This is Rob at Arcadia Contemporary's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Nick Alm has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nick Alm. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:05, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I have provided more sources and resubmitted the draft for publishing. Have a great day.

Rob Rob at Arcadia Contemporary (talk) 17:02, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Jane Ansell (March 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mary Jane Ansell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mary Jane Ansell, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 23:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rob at Arcadia Contemporary! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 23:00, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary Jane Ansell (March 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I quote the second half of this: Ansell's work is heavily influenced by the old masters such as, Botticelli, Rachel Ruysch, and Bosschaert. The intentionally dynamic compositions and details of her paintings pull the viewer in for closer inspection and contemplation. Many of the models she uses are recurring subjects. Their slight changes in expression, lighting, and posture give Ansell a new set of challenges to work on for each piece. Backgrounds of her portraits allow her to channel her love of historical painting as well as give her the opportunity to insert symbolism. With her subtle, but dramatic paintings Ansell's recurring models become characters threaded with a narrative that tackles the complexities of current events and issues of gender. Ansell currently exhibits her work internationally. Each part of this: According to which disinterested, reliable, published source? (No, neither Ansell herself nor any person or organization with a financial or other stake in her success.)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mary Jane Ansell and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mary Jane Ansell, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 06:11, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hoary,

It looks like I used the wrong source for that section, my apologies. The source for the second section is an article written about Mary Jane Ansell in American Art Collector magazine. I will make the appropriate changes and resubmit it for review. The url associated with the article is linked to Arcadia's website, but it is only to provide the pdf to read. International Art Collector magazine is in independent media company. Does that still make it an unreliable source?

Rob Rob at Arcadia Contemporary (talk) 16:45, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Bilmes (March 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Hoary were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft must demonstrate that Bilmes satisfies either WP:ARTIST or, more generally, WP:PERSON. I quote this draft: As an artist, Bilmes believes it his and his fellow creatives' responsibility to create work that leaves a lasting impression on its audience by making them see or feel something they wouldn't have otherwise experienced without the context of the work. Concepts about the complexity of reality and personal perception play a large part in the construction of his paintings as well. Bilmes' work continues to grow in intricacy. By creating personal work he develops an attachment to each piece that allows him to push it to its limit, ultimately making a visually compelling work. Bilmes is currently represent by Arcadia Contemporary in New York City. And the only reference provided for any of this is Arcadia Contemporary. As Arcadia Contemporary would profit from sales of his work, it's not disinterested and therefore not a reliable source. Where is the independent commentary from newspapers, magazines, art journals, books, etc?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Bilmes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daniel Bilmes, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 08:25, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As for the sources for Daniel Bilmes, the sources provided are linked to the Arcadia website but it is only to provide the digital pdfs of the articles. American Art Collector is independent of Arcadia. American Art Collector is a subscription based magazine so people would not be able to see the articles otherwise. Should I manually put in the source without providing a link to the article? Rob at Arcadia Contemporary (talk) 16:49, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arcadia Contemporary, and COI[edit]

Rob, I take your word for it (in your username) that you are at Arcadia Contemporary. You have written a draft about Daniel Bilmes. The draft says that "Bilmes is currently represent by Arcadia Contemporary in New York City." You've also written a draft about Mary Jane Ansell. This page tells me that Arcadia sells her work too. Please carefully read Wikipedia's Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, particularly the material in it that's about remuneration. -- Hoary (talk) 08:36, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hoary, I understand your concern for the fact that I am associated with Arcadia. I will gladly remove "Bilmes is currently represented by Arcadia Contemporary in New York City" from his draft as well as any mention of Arcadia on Mary Jane's page. These pages are made only to provide biographical information on the clearly well established artists that we work with. Rob at Arcadia Contemporary (talk) 16:59, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That would be a good first step, but only a first step. I don't know what you're doing "at" Arcadia Contemporary, but whether you're salaried or an intern, it's clear from what's written in Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure that you're regarded as making paid contributions, and that you must disclose this. I'll attend to your questions after you have disclosed this. (The method of doing this is described in Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.) -- Hoary (talk) 21:45, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If I can also add Draft:Nick Alm to this list. Per the Arcadia Contemporary website, Nick Alm is one of the artists represented. This creates an apparent COI (as well as a possible UPE) which needs to be declared either on your own user page and/or each article's talk page. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:42, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nick Alm has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nick Alm. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:44, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Alm (April 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nick Alm and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nick Alm, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mary Jane Ansell[edit]

Hello, Rob at Arcadia Contemporary. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mary Jane Ansell, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daniel Bilmes[edit]

Hello, Rob at Arcadia Contemporary. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniel Bilmes, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Rob at Arcadia Contemporary. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:12, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Rob at Arcadia Contemporary, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:12, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mary Jane Ansell[edit]

Hello, Rob at Arcadia Contemporary. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mary Jane Ansell".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:43, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nick Alm[edit]

Hello, Rob at Arcadia Contemporary. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nick Alm, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nick Alm[edit]

Hello, Rob at Arcadia Contemporary. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nick Alm".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:57, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]