User talk:Robegreg3

This is Robegreg3's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rob E. Gregory Jr. (September 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.wofford.edu/about/news/news-archives/2022/remembering-robert-e-gregory-jr-64. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Rob E. Gregory Jr. may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

StartOkayStop (talk) 20:14, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robegreg3! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! StartOkayStop (talk) 20:14, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I have updated this to show that this data was NOT pulled directly and copy/pasted from the Wofford College website, as well as updated with several documents which I will continue adding to show of its originality and validity, as well as the fact that all of this information is completely and publicly available. Mr. Gregory was honored with the words shown through most of the Wofford article in a public Bill passed by the State of South Carolina House of Representatives, and the article on the Wofford website pulls almost all of its data from this Bill regarding Rob Gregory, JR.

Certainly I am more than happy to update any text, but I feel there are certainly no grounds to say that any of the information present in the article is copyrighted by any other news source. Furthermore, I have reached out and obtained expressed permission from the College to use any information present about Mr. Gregory in my own article. I have attempted to update the article, however it would not allow me to do so at this time. If you could please get back to me with how I can resolve the issues here and get the page on Mr Gregory published, I would greatly appreciate it, as I planned to do several more articles on former executives in the Apparel Industry.

Best,

Logan Martin Robegreg3 (talk) 21:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See below. Expect Speedy deletion and start over. Paraphrase next time, or fail again. David notMD (talk) 22:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, thanks. I have already began to edit the article and have updated most of the wording that may have come into question. This is all public and should be updated sufficiently. I also have updated the picture which it seems was the main source of issue, with one I took with my mother at an event with Mr Gregory as the head speaker in 1997. Robegreg3 (talk) 22:26, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The picture was an issue but not the critical one. The copyright violation software still shows that enough of the text was copied verbatim from sources, and hence still at risk for Speedy deletion. That decision will rest with an Administrator. David notMD (talk) 02:35, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Robegreg3. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Rob E. Gregory Jr., you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. StartOkayStop (talk) 20:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I did not create this article in any form of conflict of interest. The name of my account is specically attributed to the man who I wrote the article about not understanding how this worked. I am happy to change my name to my real identity if needed to avoid any sort of issue.

My name is Logan Martin, of Chicago, IL and I have absolutely no relation whatsoever to the man I wrote it about. I respected his work in the apparel industry, particularly at the London Fog company and I intend on further updating this along with several other articles in the future regarding the apparel and fashion industry. I currently work in advertising here in Chicago. Please let me know how I can clear this up, so that my article may be approved.

Best,

Logan Martin Robegreg3 (talk) 21:29, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To reiterate, this was only my first attempt at a Wikipedia article, thus my confusion. I can happily provide evidence as well that I have no relation to the man, if needed through ID images, etc. Robegreg3 (talk) 21:35, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your statement here is sufficient to clear up that you have no personal connection to the subject of the draft. David notMD (talk) 22:08, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Expect Speedy deletion[edit]

Apparently, you copied content from a website. That is a copyright violation. Expect the entire draft to be deleted with no record of it having existed. You are welcome to try again, but all information must be paraphrased rather than copied. David notMD (talk) 22:12, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rob E. Gregory Jr. for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rob E. Gregory Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob E. Gregory Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 06:55, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]