User talk:Roboatse

Welcome!

Hello, Roboatse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Welcome!

Hello, Roboatse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like AYAF, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ~EdGl ★ 02:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AYAF

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article AYAF, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Advertisement, conflict of interest, and notability concerns.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ~EdGl ★ 02:35, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Satz

Having been published by a print-on-demand service (like XLibris) is not an assertion of notability. The article is gone; it'll be re-established only if you can come up with something better. DS (talk) 17:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Koman Coulibaly, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Koman Coulibaly was changed by Roboatse (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-06-21T19:39:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:39, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Wee-Beasties, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. MikeWazowski (talk) 05:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Was I disruptively citing my reason for making the edit too? Very convenient that you left out me citing guidelines and articles in my edits while you were simply expressing a seemingly biased opinion. Could bother to explain your actions, instead you insult people's account status. I am curious to see what you think is a better source for the local scene in Denton TX since you seem to know so much about it.Roboatse (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]