User talk:Rodriguezandres789

Thor Vandalism[edit]

Why did you edit the Thor article to say that the title character was played by Anthony Hopkins?! Why would you go to all the trouble of creating an account just to vandalize a page in a manner that's not even funny? Seriously, I don't get it. But if you make a habit of it, I suspect you'll soon find yourself banned. Sir kris (talk) 21:56, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Rodriguezandres789, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on [[user talk:Soren1997 (talk) 21:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)|my talk page]], or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome![reply]

Your edits to the Avatar (2009 film) article, and other film articles[edit]

Hello, Rodriguezandres789. The reason that I have reverted you at the Avatar (2009 film) article[1][2] is because of what I stated in this edit summary: Not everyone who is in a film is "starring in it." Your additions are excessive. And Jake Sully is a circular link (in other words, it redirects back to the article); you should stop linking to it in the Avatar (2009 film) article. And where is it mentioned that Jake's real name is Jacob? Where is it mentioned that's Max real name is Maxwell? You assuming that their names are short versions of those longer names amounts to WP:Original research.

If you haven't noticed, your edits to film articles are being reverted by different editors.[3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] That doesn't mean that you are supposed to add back the material. Read WP:Edit warring. You should check in the edit edit history and see why your edit was reverted, and, if you want your edit readded, start a discussion about it on the article's talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 02:50, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected of WP:Sockpuppetry[edit]

Just letting you know that you are suspected of being a sockpuppet and that the matter has been discussed. An editor has also tagged your user page as an account that is suspected of sockpupperty. Flyer22 (talk) 15:31, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alvin and the Chipmunks (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:52, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Smurfs 2 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:07, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:38, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of 20th Century Fox films may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:41, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Me, Myself & Irene, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Phillips (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

Please stop blindly reverting Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked; the version you revert to has links to nonexistent sections in the Alvin and the Chipmunks article. Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 01:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to The Lovely Bones (film) does not have an edit summary. Also, it is helpful in determining why you made the changes you did. Trivialist (talk) 12:08, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits to Bagdasarian Productions[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Greenmaven (talk) 07:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Regency Enterprises, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 16:30, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Like Mike, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Foster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Regency Enterprises, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 22:29, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rodriguezandres999, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SummerPhD (talk) 22:39, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Rodriguesandres449 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:39, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]