User talk:Rodwinoloresisimo

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have responded to your RfF. I have edited and improved your article, and have left my additional comments on the article's talk page.

P.S. When you made your RfF, you typed your name as a signature. However, Wikipedia will automatically generate your signature if you type four tidles (~~~~). This signature has links to the user's user and talk pages. Mine looks like this: Quinxorin (talk) 05:32, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE drive[edit]

Hi, thanks for signing up for the GOCE drive. You signed the right "participants" section, but somehow put your subsection of the totals list in the page for the May 2012 drive. Assuming you mean to take part in the July drive, I have transferred it to the July page here. If that's what you intended, you don't need to take any further action. Regards, --Stfg (talk) 15:07, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the notice. I overlooked some details. Yes, I'm interested to join the GOCE drive for July 2012. I might disturb you or my assigned coordinator once I start copy-editing. Best regards, --Rodwinoloresisimo (talk) 15:54, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. If you need help with anything, you're welcome to ask on my talk page. Regards, --Stfg (talk) 18:03, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Me Find Coupon.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 09:14, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Xavier Scott and other articles[edit]

Hello Rodwinoloresisimo. After you asked me about moving the Scott Xavier article (now Xavier Scott) I read the article and I think the following may help you.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. Being close to a subject includes being paid by that subject as well as family relations and friendships. People with a close connection to a subject need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible. There's more information on this topic at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

If you have any concerns about any of this and would like assistance to resolve them, you are welcome to let me know and I will do what I can to help. Kind regards, --Stfg (talk) 19:02, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roderick O'Brien[edit]

The article Roderick O'Brien has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

He fails WP:ACADEMIC. He is the director of Caring for People (CP). The blogs O'Brien has written happen to be owned by CP. There are no independent, reliable references, little alone any detail. There has to be independent, reliable refs that go into detail about him or he doesn't qualify for an article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 06:01, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm improved the article by removing the questionable sources. I assure Wikipedia that no similar incidence will occur again in my future contributions as I won't include any such unverifiable sources. Thanks! Rodwinoloresisimo (talk) 06:53, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My main concern of lack of references hasn't been addressed. There needs to be independent, reliable references about him. See WP:SOURCES as to what a good source is and isn't. The article still is in danger of being deleted without the references. Also, you don't have to sign the article at the bottom. Only need to sign on talk pages, like this one. Don't worry about making mistakes. There are some many things to learn around here that nobody knows every rule. You are new and you are expected to make goofs... just don't look at mine because I have some doozies. If you have any questions, ask away. Bgwhite (talk) 20:06, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roderick O'Brien for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roderick O'Brien is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roderick O'Brien until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bobrayner (talk) 21:14, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Scott Xavier listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:Scott Xavier. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Scott Xavier redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). bobrayner (talk) 21:25, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Patrick_M._Walsh_Jr., Rodwinoloresisimo!

Wikipedia editor Jorgath just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This article is very well-written, well-sourced. Good job! Only nitpick is that I'd like to see a larger prose-to-list ratio. - Jorgath (talk) ^(contribs) 16:45, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Jorgath's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of Albert Zambrano for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albert Zambrano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Zambrano until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Itsalleasy (talk) 02:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]