User talk:Roguehamster2073

hiiiiRoguehamster2073 (talk) 23:25, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Car hoods[edit]

Hello Roguehamster2073,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Car hoods for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[:{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 02:53, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Loriendrew with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ///EuroCarGT 02:56, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Railway Museum Mysore for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(talk) 03:07, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:189.105.190.85, you may be blocked from editing. {_C A S U K I T E ^T} 03:08, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

7 day block[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 10:11, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note[edit]

Your account has been blocked for a week due to disruptive behaviour. If this behaviour continues, the next block is likely to be longer, perhaps a month. After that, if problems continue, a 3 month block, or a year, could be given. In fact, you could end up being blocked indefinitely for continuing this behaviour. PhilKnight (talk) 10:16, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Links[edit]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive links to unrelated articles. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you are having a problem understanding linking please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 22:04, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 22:45, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]