User talk:Ronaldcameron
| This is Ronaldcameron's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
AfC notification: Draft:Archibald Clerk has a new comment[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: Archibald Clerk (July 27)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Archibald Clerk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Ronaldcameron,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bradv 20:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Archibald Clerk has been accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:06, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Archibald Clerk - thanks[edit]
Thank you, Ronaldcameron, for your excellent article Archibald Clerk. I've taken the liberty of fiddling with it, and thought I'd explain here what I've been up to. I also want to raise and immediately settle a concern about the image used.
I've made two main amendments in this edit:
- I reformatted the references to books using {{cite book}}, the template preferentially used for book citations. There was nothing wrong with your by-hand citations, but there are probably advantages of consistency and data accessibility in using a structured template for such data.
- I then used {{sfn}} - short footnotes - for the two books to which you have multiple references, and demoted mention of the book titles to a sources section. This is (as I understand it) Harvard format referencing. The advantage here is that the references section can point to the author (or editor), date and page number, avoiding repetitions of the title, publisher, etc, in the references list.
I very much hope that you'll contribute more, and if so, I'd encourage you to use {{cite book}}. Equally, if you don't, the chances are that someone'll come along and convert them in due time.
Next, the photo. First, I moved it in an earlier edit to the top of the page - this is the conventional position for an image of the subject of the article. My concern here is that the image on the commons - w:c:File:Aclerk.jpg - did not have a copyright/licence tag on it, and I thought it likely that the image would at some time be challenged. From its description, I concur with you that it is in the public domain. I've added {{PD-1923}} and {{PD-old}} to the file in this edit, which should do the trick.
Finally, thanks also for your work on Mary Mackellar. Slàinte mhath! --Tagishsimon (talk) 23:04, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Mary McPherson[edit]
Nice addition .... are you close enough to get pic of the plaque? cheers Victuallers (talk) 13:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC) Thanks. I've just added some more content. In the next few months I should be able to photograph her gravestone and the plaque in Portree. A photo of Mairi herself is also scanable and in the public domainRonaldcameron (talk) 16:27, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 13[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Archibald Clerk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scottish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: John Murdoch (editor) has been accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
-- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 21:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Seasons Greetings[edit]
Merry Christmas from me! Thanks for your company during 2016. We have seen the percentage of articles on women rise from 15.5% to 16.77%. 20% is within our grasp and that's an increase of 11% over what we first found. Victuallers (talk) 15:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
John MacKenzie (mountain guide)[edit]
It was great to see your new article on John MacKenzie (mountain guide) - it brought back many memories of climbs on Skye - including standing on the Cioch Buttress over 20 years ago. As there don't appear to be any images of MacKenzie on Wikimedia, I wondered if you'd considered contacting Skysculpture or Jamie Grant to ask if they would be willing to make any of their photos available? (close up of grave/sculpture mannequin etc). If not, I'd be happy to do this for you. There are clearly a lot of old images of MacKenzie out there (see the @SkyeSculpture Twitter stream), though I'm not sure if it could definitely be provable that they were out of copyright. (Wikimedia licencing is not my strong point). Maybe you already have plans for this? Sorry if my added references are a mess. I didn't want to break convention by converting all of yours to citation template format - so hopefully you'll deal with mine if they aren't quite right. Regards. Parkywiki (talk) 12:34, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Help me![edit]
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
How can I reply to a message from an editor who has made improvements to article that I started, please.
Please help me with...
Ronaldcameron (talk) 18:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hi @Ronaldcameron, to reply to an editor, it sort of depends on if they made some comments about the article or not. If they did (for example on the article's talk page) then just click the "edit" or "edit source" button next to the section header that they made the comments in, then put your reply below, type four tildes (like this
~~~~) to add your signature, then press the "save changes" button. You can also use the template {{reply to}} to notify the editor that you've replied to them (I've used this template in this reply to make the "@Ronaldcameron" at the start of this message), click here for more information on using this template. But if the editor didn't make any comments on a talk page, then you need to visit the editor's user talk page (this page is your user talk page), click "add topic" button at the top to the left of the search bar, write your reply in the box, add the four tildes, then press the "save changes" button. Hopefully this helped, but if it didn't, click this link, ask another question and mention which editor it is you wish to reply to, and another kind editor will hopefully notify this editor for you. Also, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Seagull123 Φ 20:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Ronaldcameron. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Ronaldcameron. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)