User talk:Rosemaryujoh

Welcome!

Hello, Rosemaryujoh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to do lots more. Some useful pages to visit are:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:47, 28 April 2015 (UTC).

Multiple accounts policy

If this account is used by User:Cada mori, please be aware of Wikipedia's policies regarding multiple accounts. To use multiple undisclosed accounts to edit the same topics and/or to create an illusion of support for a specific position (i.e. with regards to Shunaid Qureshi‎) is not allowed.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:41, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure why you would think I have multiple accounts, Do you have proof or are you just assuming? Cada mori (talk) 18:42, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not assuming anything, which is why I wrote "If this account...". As the edits by Rosemaryujog seemed very similar to your own, I wanted to ensure that they were aware of the policy regarding multiple accounts if it was applicable to their situation. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we are not related, stop making unfounded assumptions Cada mori (talk) 02:19, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently you don't understand the definition of "assumed" as you continue to misuse it. Discussing concerns with other editors is called "communicating", which is expected on a collaborative encyclopedia.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:14, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you bring up this discussion unless you assumed we were the same person? Cada mori (talk) 21:05, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I already answered you above. If you don't want to hear it I have no intention of repeating the same response, especially on other user's talk page.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:13, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're the one who initially brought it up and now you don't want to discuss it? Cada mori (talk) 03:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC) Thank you for your concerns regarding this page User:Ponyo as you can see from the Sockpuppet investigation, this account is not a sockpuppet.[reply]

Thanks Jezebel's Ponyob! I don't understand what you mean by multiple account.. I'm Rose.. I just read the article relating to "Shunaid Quereshi", some parts appears to defame the subject.. Talking about arrest and money laundering.I don't know whether the allegations are true or not. My only concern is that wikipedia has a rule on neutrality. It's not a medium to defame someone. I don't know if I'm right anyway.. Thanks Rosemaryujoh (talk) 18:52, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rose, Wikipedia has a strict policy with regards to how we write about living people. Negative content can be included in articles as long as it is supported by reliable sources and does not put undue stress on negative aspects in relation to the whole of the individual's notability. There is a noticeboard where you can bring specific concerns about biography articles for discussion with other editors.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:01, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. [1] MER-C 12:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks MER-C for this notice. I'm really sorry. I never meant any harm. I'll never do that again.

Nomination of DJ Kamal Mustafa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DJ Kamal Mustafa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Kamal Mustafa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 05:20, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of KartRocket

A tag has been placed on KartRocket requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 01:53, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Natalac records.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Natalac records.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:18, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vedas (Indian Restaurant) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vedas (Indian Restaurant) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vedas (Indian Restaurant) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:48, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]