User talk:Roundwell

re: royal anthem

Please see my response. Carson 08:09, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: Royal Anthems

Dear Roundwell, please stop trying to remove the royal anthem from pages with out consensus. There may be consensus on the Australia talk page to remove the royal anthem, however, in other commonwealth nation that is not the case. In Canada, we "love", at least most of us, the Queen, and Her representative, the Governor-General, is quite popular. Anyways, the point is, stop trying to remove content with the consensus that is needed to make such a change to an article. Nat Tang ^{ta | co | em} 08:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

I wholeheartedly agree. I strongly support the decision to remove the royal anthem from the Australia page (well, i support the current footnoted version), but i don't agree that this was 'consensus' to remove it from other articles. Anyway, who are you? Seems strange that a new user get's immediately stuck into such an issue. You are a sock of who? Merbabu 09:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Potentially violating the three revert rule

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Solomon Islands. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Wantok (toktok) 00:16, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Last Warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Brian | (Talk) 00:34, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

I agree with Brian New Zealand, and the others who have warned you about your disruptive behaviour. Any repeat will get you blocked from editing.-gadfium 02:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)