User talk:RoySmith/Archive 37
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:RoySmith. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 30 | ← | Archive 35 | Archive 36 | Archive 37 | Archive 38 | Archive 39 | Archive 40 |
Sandesh9822
I disagree with your analysis here, given these accounts are between "possilikely and likely", i.e. same persons. You also said that "neither of the suspected socks has edited in the past 3-5 weeks", which might have been correct at that time but not anymore because one of them is still editing and ultimately both users are engaging in tag-teaming on the same article. Basically, they are WP:NOTHERE.
How they can be different persons? Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 18:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Aman.kumar.goel, I took another look. Unfortunately, I'm at pretty much the same point I was earlier, which is that while it does seem likely, I'm not sure enough to block them. I try to be conservative about blocking; if in doubt, I don't block, and that's where I am now. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:53, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- I don't know if there is really a room for doubt. You may want to reopen the SPI so that other clerks can also take a look? Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 19:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Aman.kumar.goel, My suggestion is to keep an eye on things and if additional evidence comes to light, feel free to open a new investigation. But, please note, you'll need additional evidence, just reiterating that you don't agree with the previous decision isn't going to be enough. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- I don't know if there is really a room for doubt. You may want to reopen the SPI so that other clerks can also take a look? Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 19:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Sock posts at Talk:Cambodian New Year
Hi RoySmith. Do you think the posts added to Talk:Cambodian New Year by PPSOfficial should be removed or collapsed? They're more of a rhetorical rant than a post seeking a response per se (at least in my opinion), but the main problem is that the account was blocked as a SOCK and the posts might fall under WP:EVADE. I thought about adding {{Csp}}, but perhaps outright removal would be better per WP:TPG#sockvote. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:01, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Marchjuly, The general rule is to not remove anything from a talk page unless it's actually offensive, disruptive, or threatening, etc. This edit might be considered WP:UNCIVIL, but I don't think it rises to the level where it needs to be deleted. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:27, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
- Understand. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:13, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
More evidence, tagging
Leaving it here since the SPI case has already been closed. See [1], if you open that reference it's a self-published manual written by "Adhithya Kiran", who is User:Adhithya Kiran Chekavar. Othayoth shankaran has not yet been tagged with Adhithya Kiran Chekavar. User is now logged-out editing too on the same articles, also violating a topic ban. 157.44.176.17 (talk) 08:53, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note. Othayoth shankaran was blocked for various forms of disruptive behavior, but not specifically identified as a sock. That's why they're not tagged. It's certainly possible they are indeed a sock, but at this point, the effort to figure that out exceeds the value. If there's other block evasion going on, the best thing would be to open a new SPI report, so all the information stays in one place. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:04, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
- Can you remove that promotional spam reference from Kalaripayattu? It is cited in the lead and in History (his claim derived from the name of Hindu deity Khaloorika Bhagavathy need removal) and Further reading section. 157.46.168.56 (talk) 10:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- That seems like a content issue which you should discuss on the article's talk page. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:05, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, I forgot you were the page-protected admin and you yourself cannot get involved. No worries. 157.46.173.91 (talk) 15:02, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- Personal attack and racial slur (those logs are now stikethrough). He don't know what caste am I or I have a caste at all. But still he invoked the name of a lower-caste to insult me, also disparaging them. Insult against Pulaya, a Scheduled Caste is punishable by law, he also used the word "dalit" in a derogatory manner, which is banned by the government. I can even file a case in the cyber cell. This range should be blocked--157.44.211.16 (talk) 07:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
- New SPI filed. 157.44.160.244 (talk) 06:32, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- That seems like a content issue which you should discuss on the article's talk page. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:05, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
- Can you remove that promotional spam reference from Kalaripayattu? It is cited in the lead and in History (his claim derived from the name of Hindu deity Khaloorika Bhagavathy need removal) and Further reading section. 157.46.168.56 (talk) 10:28, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
T271624
Can you add me to viewers on T271624? — xaosflux Talk 22:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Xaosflux, Oh, I didn't realize opening it as a security issue would limit who could view it. I don't know how to add you, but I'll try to figure it out. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:21, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- OK. I've added you. Ping me if that didn't work as expected. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- I'd like to view it as well if you're comfortable with that. Johnuniq (talk) 22:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Done. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- I'd like to view it as well if you're comfortable with that. Johnuniq (talk) 22:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- OK. I've added you. Ping me if that didn't work as expected. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- TY! — xaosflux Talk 01:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- You can choose to be reminded when you have not added an edit summary. This can be done in your preferences. This could conflict with the CAPTCHA. This has now been fixed. [2]
- You can link to specific log entries. You can get these links for example by clicking the timestamps in the log. Until now, such links to private log entries showed no entry even if you had permission to view private log entries. The links now show the entry. [3]
- Admins can use the abuse filter tool to automatically prevent bad edits. Three changes happened last week:
- The filter editing interface now shows syntax errors while you type. This is similar to JavaScript pages. It also shows a warning for regular expressions that match the empty string. New warnings will be added later. [4]
- Oversighters can now hide multiple filter log entries at once using checkboxes on Special:AbuseLog. This is how the usual revision deletion works. [5]
- When a filter matches too many actions after it has been changed it is "throttled". The most powerful actions are disabled. This is to avoid many editors getting blocked when an administrator made a mistake. The administrator will now get a notification about this "throttle".
There is a new tool to build new skins. You can also see existing skins. You can give feedback. [6]- Bots using the API no longer watch pages automatically based on account preferences. Setting the
watchlisttowatchwill still work. This is to reduce the size of the watchlist data in the database. [7] - Scribunto's file metadata now includes length. [8]
- CSS and JavaScript code pages now have link anchors to line numbers. You can use wikilinks like w:en:MediaWiki:Common.js#L-50. [9]
There was a new version of MediaWiki last week. You can read a detailed log of all 763 changes. Most of them are very small and will not affect you.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 12 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 13 January. It will be on all wikis from 14 January (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
15:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
I am not enthusiastic about blocking a /20 either; what about a partial for starters? It would limit the damage. He does enjoy editing exactly the same pages every time. It would also limit my ability to recognize him when (not if) he comes back, but that is less important. Elizium23 (talk) 16:15, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- If you could identify a reasonably small set of pages that would benefit from this, I'll be happy to look into that. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:51, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Presidency of Rodrigo Duterte
- List of current Philippine provincial governors
- List of mayors of Metro Manila
- 2020 in the Philippines
- List of canonically crowned images
- Beatifications of Pope Pius XII
- List of people beatified by Pope John XXIII
- List of people beatified by Pope Paul VI
- List of people beatified by Pope John Paul II
- List of people beatified by Pope Benedict XVI
- List of people beatified by Pope Francis
- List of people declared venerable by Pope John XXIII
- List of people declared venerable by Pope Paul VI
- List of people declared venerable by Pope John Paul II
- List of people declared venerable by Pope Benedict XVI
- List of people declared venerable by Pope Francis
- So what I'd like to know is - are partial blocks accomplished by article name or by reference? I've a mind to rename one of those articles, so let's keep it in mind if he's blocked from it. Elizium23 (talk) 17:55, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Elizium23, Hmmm. My understanding is that partial blocks are expensive to implement, so I was thinking more like 2 or 3 pages. Indeed, per Wikipedia:Partial_blocks#Technical_considerations, there's a limit of 10. If the list is this long, partial block may not be the right tool. Partial block or semi-protection might still be called for, but for now, let's just keep an eye on this and see what happens.
- I had to look it up, but it appears that partial blocks follow page moves. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:44, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, if I had to name three I would say: List of current Philippine provincial governors, List of people beatified by Pope Francis, and List of people declared venerable by Pope Francis. I would wish to add List of canonically crowned images if it could not be protected which I have a request currently queued. Elizium23 (talk) 18:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Elizium23, OK, I've done the three [10]. If he comes back, please open a new SPI report. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Okay, if I had to name three I would say: List of current Philippine provincial governors, List of people beatified by Pope Francis, and List of people declared venerable by Pope Francis. I would wish to add List of canonically crowned images if it could not be protected which I have a request currently queued. Elizium23 (talk) 18:58, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Friday Jan 15: ONLINE Wikipedia Day NYC
| January 15, 6pm: Wikimedia NYC celebrates 20 years of Wikipedia | |
|---|---|
  Wikipedia Day is always a big day for Wikimedia NYC. While we cannot meet in person, we still have something special planned. We will begin the event with the debut of a new video celebrating our community. This will be followed by a panel discussion with some of the people you'll see in the video talking about Wikipedia's 20th anniversary, Wikimedia New York City, and the amazing work they do on Wikimedia projects. The event will be broadcast live via YouTube. Feel free to ask questions for the panel through the chat! We will also have some NYC wiki trivia you can participate in, with confectionery prizes.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 14:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Help with sockpuppets
Hello there. You may remember this sockpuppet case Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Frank marine/Archive, which I was involved with in 2019. A quick look at Thai army related articles still presents many problems:
- Similar edits to sockmater Frank marine made by this IP
- I don't think Gav the Meerkat is a sockpuppet, but has shown a similar style of editing to Thai army related articles.
- And another IP.
I don't know what's going on here but a look at the articles in question (Royal Thai Marine Corps, Royal Thai Army to name a couple), present a number of problems most notably unreferenced content and long lists that have little sense or relevance to the article. I would appreciate help with this matter, especially as I think the best course of action would be to go to the administrators' noticeboard or somewhere else with more editor involvement but I would prefer another thought on this. (pinging EdJohnston as they were involved as well). Kind regards, Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 00:07, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Willbb234. The IP you mentioned above, 49.228.195.60 (talk · contribs) hasn't edited since 15 July 2020, while 49.228.154.167 (talk · contribs) has only three edits. And nobody has tried contacting User:Gav the Meerkat to discuss their edits. It is premature (in my opinion) to reopen the SPI case. You may be right that Royal Thai Army could use some improvement. The WP:MILHIST project is quite active; you might ask them for suggestions. I am glad you are still interested in these articles. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 00:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 19 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 20 January. It will be on all wikis from 21 January (calendar).
Future changes
- The Growth team plans to add features to get more visitors to edit to more Wikipedias. You can help translating the interface.
- You will be able to read but not to edit Wikimedia Commons for a short time on 26 January at 07:00 (UTC). [11]
- MassMessage posts could be automatically timestamped in the future. This is because MassMessage senders can now send pages using MassMessage. Pages are more difficult to sign. If there are times when a MassMessage post should not be timestamped you can let the developers know.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
16:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Editing news 2021 #1
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter
Reply tool
The Reply tool is available at most other Wikipedias.
- The Reply tool has been deployed as an opt-out preference to all editors at the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedias.
- It is also available as a Beta Feature at almost all Wikipedias except for the English, Russian, and German-language Wikipedias. If it is not available at your wiki, you can request it by following these simple instructions.
Research notes:
- As of January 2021, more than 3,500 editors have used the Reply tool to post about 70,000 comments.
- There is preliminary data from the Arabic, Czech, and Hungarian Wikipedia on the Reply tool. Junior Contributors who use the Reply tool are more likely to publish the comments that they start writing than those who use full-page wikitext editing.[12]
- The Editing and Parsing teams have significantly reduced the number of edits that affect other parts of the page. About 0.3% of edits did this during the last month.[13] Some of the remaining changes are automatic corrections for Special:LintErrors.
A large A/B test will start soon.[14] This is part of the process to offer the Reply tool to everyone. During this test, half of all editors at 24 Wikipedias (not including the English Wikipedia) will have the Reply tool automatically enabled, and half will not. Editors at those Wikipeedias can still turn it on or off for their own accounts in Special:Preferences.
New discussion tool
The new tool for starting new discussions (new sections) will join the Discussion tools in Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures at the end of January. You can try the tool for yourself.[15] You can leave feedback in this thread or on the talk page.
Next: Notifications
During Talk pages consultation 2019, editors said that it should be easier to know about new activity in conversations they are interested in. The Notifications project is just beginning. What would help you become aware of new comments? What's working with the current system? Which pages at your wiki should the team look at? Please post your advice at mw:Talk:Talk pages project/Notifications.
–Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 01:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- You will be able to read but not to edit Wikimedia Commons for a short time on 26 January at 07:00 (UTC). You will not be able to read or edit Wikitech for a short time on 28 January at 09:00 (UTC). [16][17]
Changes later this week
- Bracket matching will be added to the CodeMirror syntax highlighter on the first wikis. The first wikis are German and Catalan Wikipedia and maybe other Wikimedia wikis. This will happen on 27 January. [18]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 26 January. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 27 January. It will be on all wikis from 28 January (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:30, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Re: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sheldonium
Okay, that makes more sense, but given that the discussion that I initiated (the one going in the direction of another sockmaster) was already rendered moot, as we reverted to the analysis that another user brought up independently, I don't think it's a case of a single person being the judge and the jury. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:22, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2021
- News and notes: 1,000,000,000 edits, board elections, virtual Wikimania 2021
- Special report: Wiki reporting on the United States insurrection
- In focus: From Anarchy to Wikiality, Glaring Bias to Good Cop: Press Coverage of Wikipedia's First Two Decades
- Technology report: The people who built Wikipedia, technically
- Videos and podcasts: Celebrating 20 years
- News from the WMF: Wikipedia celebrates 20 years of free, trusted information for the world
- Recent research: Students still have a better opinion of Wikipedia than teachers
- Humour: Dr. Seuss's Guide to Wikipedia
- Featured content: New Year, same Featured Content report!
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2020
- Obituary: Flyer22 Frozen
Administrators' newsletter – February 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).
|
|
|
Arbitration
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people
, replacing the 1932 cutoff.
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- IPv6 addresses were written in lowercase letters in diffs. This caused dead links since Special:Contributions only accepted uppercase letters for the IPs. This has been fixed. [19]
Changes later this week
- You can soon use Wikidata to link to pages on the multilingual Wikisource. [20]
- Often editors use a "non-breaking space" to make a gap between two items when reading but still show them together. This can be used to avoid a line break. You will now be able to add new ones via the special character tool in the 2010, 2017, and visual editors. The character will be shown in the visual editor as a space with a grey background. [21][22]
- Wikis use abuse filters to stop bad edits being made. Filter maintainers can now use syntax like
1.2.3.4 - 1.2.3.55as well as the1.2.3.4/27syntax for IP ranges. [23] - The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 2 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 3 February. It will be on all wikis from 4 February (calendar).
Future changes
- Minerva is the skin Wikimedia wikis use for mobile traffic. When a page is protected and you can't edit it you can normally read the source wikicode. This doesn't work on Minerva on mobile devices. This is being fixed. Some text might overlap. This is because your community needs to update MediaWiki:Protectedpagetext to work on mobile. You can read more. [24][25]
- Cloud VPS and Toolforge will change the IP address they use to contact the wikis. The new IP address will be
185.15.56.1. This will happen on February 8. You can read more.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
22:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Massachusetts RMV Scandal aka Randolph 7 Case
The 2019-2020 Massachusetts RMV scandal has become a hot topic again after a sudden & controversial change in MassDOT leadership. I am willing to start a new RMV scandal page but fear it will be removed. The 2020 Stephanie Pollack page was setup by a Northeastern student. The student freely mentions this on Twitter. COI. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strala00 (talk • contribs) 02:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
- Strala00, It's unclear what you are requesting. If you want to recreate a page and you're not sure the new page will be accepted, the best general advice I can give is to write it as a draft and submit it for review. -- RoySmith (talk) 03:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Ok. I'll send a draft later this month — Preceding unsigned comment added by Strala00 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigations
Hi Roy. What do you exactly mean with "If Qiushufang is uploading copyrighted material on enwiki, they can be blocked for that." The user has uploaded hundreds of copyright violations on Commons and then included in articles on enwiki. It is curious that he is still allowed to edit here, while he has been long blocked on Commons for his behaviour. What evidence do you need and where should I present it? Gun Powder Ma (talk) 21:13, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Gun Powder Ma, Hi, and thanks for your note. Commons is a separate project from enwiki. Issues about what they upload to commons need to be raised there. They have their own policies, admins, checkusers, and investigation processes.
- The other part of the answer is that on enwiki, we only block accounts to prevent ongoing disruption, per WP:BLOCKPREVENTATIVE. Since Gunman Dan hasn't edited on enwiki since last August, there's really no point in blocking them here. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Curry
Hey Roy, I just noticed you blocked TeluguWikieditor as an ArthurCurry70 sock. I noticed that Varudu Kaavalenu, which had previously been created by TeluguWikieditor, was recreated by Hyderabadi Wikipedian. Hyderabad is a Telugu-speaking city. Naturally, bells went off. The two versions of the article are different, however. Interaction report here. What do you think? I'm feeling like it's a sock. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
- Cyphoidbomb, Well, as I wrote in the SPI,
if not sock, then certainly UPE, so I don't think we're going too far wrong
, which I'd say certainly still applies here. The whole Indian cinema area really is just one big sock drawer, isn't it? If you file an SPI, ping me and I'll look into it more. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The Wikipedia app for Android now has watchlists and talk pages in the app. [26]
Changes later this week
- You can see edits to chosen pages on Special:Watchlist. You can add pages to your watchlist on every wiki you like. The GlobalWatchlist extension will come to Meta on 11 February. There you can see entries on watched pages on different wikis on the same page. The new watchlist will be found on Special:GlobalWatchlist on Meta. You can choose which wikis to watch and other preferences on Special:GlobalWatchlistSettings on Meta. You can watch up to five wikis. [27]
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 9 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 10 February. It will be on all wikis from 11 February (calendar).
Future changes
- When admins protect pages the form will use the OOUI look. Special:Import will also get the new look. This will make them easier to use on mobile phones. [28][29]
- Some services will not work for a short period of time from 07:00 UTC on 17 February. There might be problems with new short links, new translations, new notifications, adding new items to your reading lists or recording email bounces. This is because of database maintenance. [30]
- Last week Tech News reported that the IP address Cloud VPS and Toolforge use to contact the wikis will change on 8 February. This is delayed. It will happen later instead. [31]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Help for review of friend's account
Hey user:RoySmith Can you help me with reviewing a blocked account. It is of my friend who has been blocked due to some misunderstanding that he is a paid editor. Please feel free to read his explanation. user:Skhandelwal060806August01 (talk) 17:45, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
SPI
Hi. You identified a sockpuppet of Lordpermaximum. This account has recently been created. In a clear provocation, their user page is copied and pasted from my own. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Adhs791 NEDOCHAN (talk) 08:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- NEDOCHAN, Hmmm, I see the user page copy, but what's the connection to Lordpermaximum? -- RoySmith (talk) 15:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is their edit (the exact bee in their bonnet) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nick_Diaz&diff=prev&oldid=1006127238NEDOCHAN (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- NEDOCHAN, I'm still not seeing how they're connected to Lordpermaximum, but blocked as WP:NOTHERE. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- This is their edit (the exact bee in their bonnet) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nick_Diaz&diff=prev&oldid=1006127238NEDOCHAN (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you both for reaching that conclusion and sparing me from the angst of going through the process. It's a rather unpleasant thing and NOTHERE is a fine and reasonable summation.NEDOCHAN (talk) 19:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
House Church
Hey there, I saw that you just commented on House xChurch stuff on the 10th. This article was one of his favourite targets and now User'sfavoriteshowekdujekevaaste2 has sprung up there. This editor in particular seems to be singularly focussed on that article, but that could be one of several open accounts. Just a thought. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Cyphoidbomb, Thanks. I've blocked them and asked for CU to confirm. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marioluigi187
Hi. I saw you archived Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marioluigi187 - there was an unanswered question about whether or not the accounts were indeed being used improperly. Would you mind restoring it? Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 22:50, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- DannyS712, I've backed it out. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Problems
- There were problems with recent versions of MediaWiki. Because the updates caused problems the developers rolled back to an earlier version. Some updates and new functions will come later than planned. [32][33]
- Some services will not work for a short period of time from 07:00 UTC on 17 February. There might be problems with new short links, new translations, new notifications, adding new items to your reading lists or recording email bounces. This is because of database maintenance. [34]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 16 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 17 February. It will be on all wikis from 18 February (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
17:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
February 17: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC
| February 17, 7pm: ONLINE WikiWednesday Salon NYC | |
|---|---|
|
You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-8pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop. To join the meeting from your computer or smartphone, just visit this link. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person! This month will include a discussion of Black WikiHistory Month in February, plans for WikiWomen's History Month in March, and of course the great work that is being done in these topical areas throughout the year. We will also have a relevant demonstration of the Wikipedia:Did you know process. If there's a project you'd like to share or a question you'd like answered, just let us know by adding it to the agenda or responding to this message.
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 01:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Repeat sock/vandal
At this SPI case, you had asked to be notified if the disruption resumed, as the article had been temporarily protected. The pp expired 2 days ago and the same edits started up again right after. I have requested pp again. (FYI) Cheers - wolf 07:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thewolfchild, Thanks for the ping. I see somebody else already got there to extend the protection, so we're good for a while. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
SPI procedural merge
Hi RoySmith, should Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KIENGIR/Archive be merged into Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Stubes99, per the outcome? I've tagged the sock, and assume keeping all cases on the same SPI page helps with tracking them. CMD (talk)
- CMD, thanks for your note. I'm going to unarchive it, and follow up on the SPI page. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Apologies for using the wrong input in the tag. Diannaa has corrected it, so I believe this can be re-closed to slightly reduce the backlog. CMD (talk) 03:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Chipmunkdavis, No worries, and thanks again for pointing out the problem. If I might suggest, however, it would be best to leave tagging to the SPI clerks. Sometimes it gets a bit complicated. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- No worries, I understood the pointed talkpage message. It does seem however that the whole area is a bit understaffed. CMD (talk) 15:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Chipmunkdavis, On the understaffed part, you are 100% right there. We can use all the help we can get (and I certainly appreciate you pitching in). It's just that applying the final SPI tags is one of the more technical parts of the process with some nuances that take a while to figure out. That's why I suggested leaving the tagging to the clerks. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- No worries, I understood the pointed talkpage message. It does seem however that the whole area is a bit understaffed. CMD (talk) 15:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Chipmunkdavis, No worries, and thanks again for pointing out the problem. If I might suggest, however, it would be best to leave tagging to the SPI clerks. Sometimes it gets a bit complicated. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Apologies for using the wrong input in the tag. Diannaa has corrected it, so I believe this can be re-closed to slightly reduce the backlog. CMD (talk) 03:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
CU
Hey, RoySmith. Hope you're well. I filed another Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JohnGotten a few days ago. Did the CU show all linked accounts or did it investigate only the the link between Moggein and JohnGotten? I think that there may be a few other accounts.--Maleschreiber (talk) 16:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Maleschreiber, Hi. The case has been archived, so responding here. I'm going to have to defer to Oshwah; he did the CU checks, and so is in a better position to say how far that investigation went. More generally, if there's other accounts you suspect, the best thing would be to open another SPI report. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:47, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Mistake?
Hey there, re: this, you mean TeluguWikieditor, not Ab207, right? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Cyphoidbomb, Actually, no. I was thinking about Ab207 from the 13 February 2021 report. But, the CU folks will have much better insight into this. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Well from my perspective, Ab is a participating member of the community. I would hope that compelling behavioural evidence exists beyond mere intersections. We all have our instincts, so I don't want to step on yours, but I've interacted with them a number of times, vs. no times with any of these others. Tarunq and the other are totally silent operators. See also this discussion. And if I've been part of a long-con, I'll take that as a lesson. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Cyphoidbomb, Thanks for the additional info. I haven't done an in-depth look, just enough to get suspicious and ask for CU. If you've interacted with them over the long term, I put more weight in your hunches than mine. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Well, now based on the CU, it looks like it could be possible. Hyderabadi is someone who has communicated with me, so it's possible that I've been part of the long-con. Yet another reason why more eyes are always better. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Cyphoidbomb, Thanks for the additional info. I haven't done an in-depth look, just enough to get suspicious and ask for CU. If you've interacted with them over the long term, I put more weight in your hunches than mine. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- Well from my perspective, Ab is a participating member of the community. I would hope that compelling behavioural evidence exists beyond mere intersections. We all have our instincts, so I don't want to step on yours, but I've interacted with them a number of times, vs. no times with any of these others. Tarunq and the other are totally silent operators. See also this discussion. And if I've been part of a long-con, I'll take that as a lesson. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Mentioned one of your SPI closing comments
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Delfield's harrassement. Thank you. I don't think your involvement is necessary, I'm just letting you know as I referred to this closing comment of yours [35] of an old SPI as unfortunately one of the participants doesn't see to have taken the advice on board instead thinking it just needs someone to evaluate the closed SPI. Nil Einne (talk) 15:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Sock tp
Hi, just wanted to make sure you knew that was my post in the first place. FYI - wolf 21:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thewolfchild, Thanks for your note. I assume you're talking about User talk:Elladhtis? Yes, I know that. I appreciate that you're trying to help, but the general rule is to leave other people's user talk pages alone, other than to send them messages. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- Not so much trying to help, I just removed my own post, which I'm allowed to do, so not sure why you keep undoing that. - wolf 23:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- The visual editor will now use MediaSearch to find images. You can search for images on Commons in the visual editor when you are looking for illustrations. This is to help editors find better images. [36]
- The syntax highlighter now works with more languages: Futhark, Graphviz/DOT, CDDL and AMDGPU. [37]
Problems
- Editing a timeline might have removed all text from it. This was because of a bug and has been fixed. You might need to edit the timeline again for it to show properly. [38]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 23 February. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 24 February. It will be on all wikis from 25 February (calendar).
Future changes
- There is a user group for developers and users interested in working on Wikimedia wikis with the Rust programming language. You can join or tell others who want to make your wiki better in the future.
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
00:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Thursday Feb 25: ONLINE Black Wiki History Month at the Schomburg Center
| Feb 25, 1:30-5pm: Black Wiki History Month at the Schomburg Center | |
|---|---|
 You are invited to join the AfroCROWD and Wikimedia NYC communities for the 7th year of this edit-a-thon, this time being held in a virtual format. More information about how to connect is available on the meetup page, and register on the form to get the Zoom link. We look forward to seeing local Wikimedians, but would also like to invite folks from the greater New York metropolitan area (and beyond!) who might not typically be able to join us in person!
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
--Wikimedia New York City Team 07:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| One year! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Lhiroshima (talk) 00:01, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Lhiroshima, It's unfortunate you waited this long to send it, because the master in the case went stale a few days ago. But he with the crazy hair already declined CU due to a lack of on-wiki evidence, so it probably wouldn't have made any difference. They're all blocked as UPE anyway, so it doesn't seem particularly urgent to figure out if they're also socks. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Oh yes... he with the crazy hair. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- RoySmith, thanks for letting me know. I should have informed you earlier. But anyways as you said, the primary work was done. Lhiroshima (talk) 08:11, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Lhiroshima (talk) 09:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- RoySmith, here's something you may find actionable and interesting. Lhiroshima (talk) 09:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Cyprus SPI
Hi RoySmith, per your comment at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cypriot Chauvinist, notifying you (here as case is now closed) that the editor in question is back with IP 81.178.220.215 (talk · contribs), including going back to Cypriot National Guard. (FYI pinging FDW777 as well.) CMD (talk) 14:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
- Chipmunkdavis, Thanks, I've added a partial block and updated the SPI. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
On second though, re Antagonist
On second thought (I don't know why this didn't occur to me before), it would make sense to turn on Pending Changes for Antagonist. Then we'd have the benefit of establishing the IP user's identity through the usual pattern while preventing the user's changes from being publicly visible. Largoplazo (talk) 16:46, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
I just submitted a request at WP:RPP. Largoplazo (talk)
The Signpost: 28 February 2021
- News and notes: Maher stepping down
- Disinformation report: A "billionaire battle" on Wikipedia: Sex, lies, and video
- In the media: Corporate influence at OSM, Fox watching the hen house
- News from the WMF: Who tells your story on Wikipedia
- Featured content: A Love of Knowledge, for Valentine's Day
- Traffic report: Does it almost feel like you've been here before?
- Gallery: What is Black history and culture?
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Recent changes
- Wikis using the Growth team tools can now show the name of a newcomer's mentor anywhere through a magic word. This can be used for welcome messages or userboxes.
- A new version of the VideoCutTool is now available. It enables cropping, trimming, audio disabling, and rotating video content. It is being created as part of the developer outreach programs.
Problems
- There was a problem with the job queue. This meant some functions did not save changes and mass messages were delayed. This did not affect wiki edits. [39]
- Some editors may not be logged in to their accounts automatically in the latest versions of Firefox and Safari. [40]
Changes later this week
- The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 2 March. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 3 March. It will be on all wikis from 4 March (calendar).
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
19:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)