User talk:Rsrikanth05/Archive December 2012
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| For being a great teammate, participating in all collaborations and helping Chennai articles grow. Rasnaboy (talk) 11:16, 1 December 2012 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| For your work on Chennai Central for COTM of November Anbu121 (talk me) 14:48, 1 December 2012 (UTC) |
talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--RAT -.- Poke it 20:41, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
SYNTH page edit undo
Why was my edit undone? I updated the minimum system requirements for the game as enumerated on the creator's site and in the game's readme document, and added the reference to his website in which he posted the requirements. You say it doesn't appear constructive but any prospective player would want to know whether they could run the most recent version of the game effectively. 72.177.31.101 (talk) 07:31, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- The link you added cannot be considered as a Reliable Source. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:35, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- The information isn't available, as far as I have seen, from any other source. It seems important to have this information available here; is it possible to have it on the page without a reference if that one can't be used? 72.177.31.101 (talk) 07:51, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, no. Anything and everything must be backed up with a source. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 07:55, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- The information isn't available, as far as I have seen, from any other source. It seems important to have this information available here; is it possible to have it on the page without a reference if that one can't be used? 72.177.31.101 (talk) 07:51, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low 
to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:09, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Duronto
:). Please see my talk page. Your comments needed--Challengethelimits (talk) 13:45, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 December 2012
- News and notes: Wiki Loves Monuments announces 2012 winner
- Featured content: The play's the thing
- Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; standardize version history tables
- Technology report: MediaWiki problems but good news for Toolserver stability
- WikiProject report: The White Rose: WikiProject Yorkshire
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 19:40, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
The RAP4 Deletion
Hello,
You recently deleted an edit I made to the RAP4 page. I would like to let you know that I think you are wrong in your decision to do so, because I left a note above the article stating " What is below is what was originally in the article before I edited it. I have contacted RAP4 and I have told them about this article and the reason I have reposted what was in this article is so they can have a chance to review and see what was originally posted." If you do not believe me I encourage you to go and look at the articles history and look at the changes I made on Dec 4th of this year. I am a happy and loyal RAP4 customer and what I am doing is what I feel is right because I want RAP4 to see what was originally posted so they can know to further monitor sights like these for bias. The owner of the company (Mike) told me that he would review the article and would make changes to it himself so that way he could make the article more "realistic" in what it says about his company. So when you read this please contact me again so we can discus in further detail about this article and about what was originally in it.
Thank you,
~~ilovepaintball~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilovepaintball (talk • contribs) 06:06, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but your edit doesn't qualify as Ecyclopaedic. It was pushing your Point of view. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:00, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
It was not my point of view, it was another persons point of view. I took it out of the article originally but like I said before, RAP4 and I agreed that they wanted to see the original article before I edited it. So I undid my changes to the article so they could see it for them selfs what was originally in it. And like I said before it was the owner of RAP4 that told me directly over the phone to undo the changes so he could see it for himself.
~~ilovepaintball~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilovepaintball (talk • contribs) 20:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- Whosever point of view it was, is irrelevant. Wikipedia is WP:NOT a blog or a place where you can post a POV. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:53, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 December 2012
- News and notes: Wobbly start to ArbCom election, but turnout beats last year's
- Featured content: Wikipedia goes to Hell
- Technology report: The new Visual Editor gets a bit more visual
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Human Rights
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 20:49, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Smile
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Could not come online much in the past week. Will try to pitch in and contribute to COTM as soon as my other pressures get over.--Challengethelimits (talk) 14:55, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
| The WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Signpost: 17 December 2012
- News and notes: Arbitrator election: stewards release the results
- WikiProject report: WikiProjekt Computerspiel: Covering Computer Games in Germany
- Discussion report: Concise Wikipedia; section headings for navboxes
- Op-ed: Finding truth in Sandy Hook
- Featured content: Wikipedia's cute ass
- Technology report: MediaWiki groups and why you might want to start snuggling newbie editors
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 23:07, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| Thank you for taking the time to write 2012 Delhi gang rape case so well. :) Legoktm (talk) 19:05, 20 December 2012 (UTC) |
Nominations open. --Anbu121 (talk me) 14:05, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
|
This is for your great work on the Delhi Gang Rape article. Cheers and keep up the good work!!! TheOriginalSoni (talk) 15:56, 22 December 2012 (UTC) |
Talkback message from Tito Dutta
Message added 13:29, 23 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hey, what's up? See this message! Tito Dutta (talk) 13:29, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
ITN for 2012 Delhi gang rape case
 | On 24 December 2012, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2012 Delhi gang rape case, which you substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page. |
--SpencerT♦C 00:19, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 December 2012
- WikiProject report: A Song of Ice and Fire
- Featured content: Battlecruiser operational
- Technology report: Efforts to "normalise" Toolserver relations stepped up
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 06:17, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
Collab?
Hello,
As you probably know already, I am a new editor from India here. I was wondering if I could help you around in collaborating for some articles? Maybe work together (or with some other editors if you want) in making quality articles? I know of many articles on India that would require a lot more updation that there is currently, for example.
Cheers, TheOriginalSoni (talk) 14:32, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
(I prefer talkbacks than replies on my talk page)
- Hi there, good to see you on the English Wikipedia. Wikipedia, is ,want for collaborations. We have various collaborations going on, like the Indian collaboration of the month, at WP:INCOTM or the Chennai COTM. Feel free to ask me if you wish to and I'll be more than happy to join you in editing an article,d and bringing it up in terms of quality. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 19:48, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
- Actually I prefer working on shorter articles than longer ones. Was wondering if you had any projects currently which could interest me to help you around. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 20:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
- I don't really know. I'm sure there must be plent of articles. Nevertheless, if anything interesting pops up, I'll be sure to let you know. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 11:23, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- Alright. Thanks.
- P.S. Both your TBs link to your user page not the talk. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 11:34, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the opportunity to make substantial valuable contributions to an article using a Low/Medium/High scale which goes from Low to High . The score is calculated by combining an article's readership and quality.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:13, 31 December 2012 (UTC)