User talk:Rubica b
Dear Rubika, FIRST 500-WORDS DEADLINE MET ON TIME. I went through your article & what has been deleted & here's what I'd like you to do. Firstly, don't refer to another website, but use a book or a journal article. Secondly, write in your own words. Don't just cut-copy-paste from another website. So, for the deadline of 9th September, I want you to add 500 words in your own words this way. -Shirin --Shirin tejani (talk) 11:12, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Article selection ok.
- Shirin (09 August 2011) --Shirin tejani (talk) 07:47, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello! Rubica b (talk) 19:42, 7 August 2011 (UTC) rubica_b
Links for Wikipedians interested in India content |
 |
|
|
Welcome kit
Register
Network
Contribute content
| ||
naveenpf (talk) 18:01, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
Special Economic Zone
[edit]
Your addition to Special Economic Zone has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Hairhorn (talk) 00:58, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
user Hairhorn, I have made a new edit to that article which has nothing to do with the previous topic or case study i had given. Thanks Rubica b (talk) 16:51, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- What you've added is simply a cut-and-paste of http://ic.gujarat.gov.in/Ind_guj/export_sez.html; I don't know if this page is subject to copyright or not (it would depend on Indian copyright law) but, again, you've failed to make a contribution in your own words. The language used is also enencyclopedic (phrases such as "Gujarat has registered an impressive performance" express a particular point of view, something to be avoided in an encyclopedia entry. Hairhorn (talk) 18:34, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
The page is not subject to copyright. It is for public use as it is a government website. Rubica b (talk) 19:50, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- Copyright is only one of the issues here, as I tried to make clear above. However, please note that Indian government works are in fact subject to copyright; see Copyright law of India. Hairhorn (talk) 19:19, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
[edit] Your addition to Socially responsible investing has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. SummerPhD (talk) 19:58, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Your sandbox page
[edit]Your userpage appears to be a collection of content copied from other webpages. Please note that copyright violations are not permitted in user space any more than they are in articlespace. Hairhorn (talk) 03:53, 7 November 2011 (UTC)