User talk:RubyC.03

This user is a student editor in McEwen_School_of_Architecture-Laurentian_University/Writings_in_Architecture_(Winter_2023) .

Welcome![edit]

Hello, RubyC.03, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zibi development moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Zibi development, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:57, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, I looked up to learn what WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict means. I am not being paid to write this article, nor do I have any conflict of interest in regards to the Zibi development. Are there elements of the article that give that impression? Thank you. RubyC.03 (talk) 12:45, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there @Onel5969, I'd like to echo @RubyC.03's question about the WP:UPE and WP:COI. They're willing to put in the work to address any issues in the article, but not sure exactly what to address. I do see on the talk page they mention something about "our own research," but that is in reference to finding reliable sources for the rest of the article. Any guidance is very much appreciated, ty. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 04:46, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. First, RubyC.03, if you leave a message for someone, please remember to "ping" them, as Brianda as done, else they will not know that you have asked a question. I wasn't ignoring you, simply did not know that you had left a query for me. Second, while we do not give out the "tells" that reviewers look for when spotting COI/UPE editors, there are clear indications that you have a personal connection to the subject of the article, in what way are you connected to the development? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:36, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Onel5969. My apologies, I had forgotten about "pinging." I am originally from the Ottawa region, where the project happens to be located (though I still live an hour away and do not interact with it on a regular basis). I did meet once with the sustainability ambassador of the development, but I was able to cross-check all information she told me with external sources, such as peer-reviewed reports. Other than that, I have no connection to the subject of the article. Thank you. RubyC.03 (talk) 12:41, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zibi development (August 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Reads like an advertisement for the project, not an encyclopedia article. May be notable in some form once complete.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zibi development and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 18:32, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Zibi development[edit]

Hello, RubyC.03. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zibi development".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:51, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]