User talk:Rudi2004
Welcome
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Ibid
[edit]I see you used an ibid citation on Henry Bishop (postmaster general) but it is highly discouraged because they can easily cause problems when an intervening citation is added. Have a look at WP:IBID. You should give you first reference a name and then use the name reference tag alone which amalgamates all the instances of the same reference together in the reference section, such as this one. Good luck. ww2censor (talk) 15:27, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
The article Sir Cecil Bisshopp, 10th baronet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Did he do anything to render himself notable per WP:NOTABILITY? I see no evidence
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:06, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
The article Sir George Bisshopp, 9th Baronet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- no evidence of notability (though possibly the the only person from Picadilly (sic) to marry a Gatherine (sic))
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:11, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
The article Sir Cecil Bisshopp, 10th baronet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence provided that he did anything to render himself notable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 11:41, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
The article Sir Cecil Bisshopp, 10th baronet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- ... apart from genealogy, assisted in the building of a church. Fails notability WP:NOTABILITY as he would appear to have done nothing notable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusoe8181 (talk) 10:28, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
- I have removed a PROD from this article, because PRODs are intended for uncontroversial deletions, so once a PROD has been removed it may not be replaced; however the article may still be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please be aware of WP:NOTDIRECTORY #2 Genealogical entries. Wikipedia's basic inclusion criterion is called WP:Notability, and the test is whether there is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," see also WP:Notability (people) and WP:Notability (summary). Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:26, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Sir Cecil Bisshopp, 10th Baronet for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sir Cecil Bisshopp, 10th Baronet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Cecil Bisshopp, 10th Baronet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Sir Cecil Bisshopp, 10th Baronet for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sir Cecil Bisshopp, 10th Baronet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Cecil Bisshopp, 10th Baronet (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 07:16, 24 February 2020 (UTC)