User talk:Rudransh108

November 2023

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. utcursch | talk 03:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rudransh108 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Utkarsh, first thing, I am not a shock puppet, secondly, I have written all the sources with sources and there is no tampering, you can see those sources, all of them are from historians like Satish Chandra, Dixit, majumdar, SS kumar etc and their sources are base in Chandela dynasty page so what is problem idk! But if I am not voilenting or abusing but just correcting the page with the source then you should also help me as a administration and not all this.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Unambiguous. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 05:35, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rudransh108 (talk) 05:05, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rudransh108 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Read my whole text what the silly reason is this, did I do anything tell me did I abused anyone or voilent anything from mine aka this account? Just tell me bro! I am not voilenting or abusing but just correcting the page with the source then you should also help me as a administration and not all this. There are only 1 book of Rk dikshit/Ss kumar mitra etc on Chandelas if someone used that then tell me from where I took refference because Wikipedia policy didn't like non historical proves so this isn't possible to found new refference coz isn't available

Decline reason:

Completely irrelevant. Yamla (talk) 11:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rudransh108 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unblock me this is not fair

Decline reason:

Confirmed by a CU as a sock of a globally locked editor. Closing and removing talk page access. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:29, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed sockpuppet of globally locked editor. Nothing unfair about it at all. --Yamla (talk) 14:01, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]